Mathe-didactical reflections on young children's understanding and application of subtraction-related principles

Mathematical Thinking and Learning

Volumn 11, Issue 1-2, 2009, Pages 102-112

  Van Den Heuvel Panhuizen, Marja ^a,b,c   Treffers, Adri ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c Fisme   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67749133623     PISSN: 10986065     EISSN: 15327833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10986060802584046     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Biehler, R., Scholz, R. W., Strässer, R., & Winkelmann, B. (Eds.). (1994). Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Bryant, P., Christie, C., & Rendu, A. (1999). Children's understanding of the relation between addition and subtraction: Inversion, identity, and decomposition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 194-212.
3. Freudenthal, H. (1978). Weeding and sowing. Preface to a science of mathematical education. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.
4. Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
5. Gilmore, C. K., & Bryant, P. (2006). Individual differences in children's understanding of inversion and arithmetical skill. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 309-331.
6. Klein, A. S. (1998). Flexibilization of mental arithmetic strategies on a different knowledge base: The empty number in a realistic versus gradual program design. Utrecht, the Netherlands: CD-β Press/Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University.
7. Klein, J. S., & Bisanz, J. (2000). Preschoolers doing arithmetic: The concepts are willing but the working memory is weak. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology-Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Experimentale, 54, 105-116.
8. Menne, J. J. M. (2001). Met sprongen vooruit. Een productief oefenprogramma voor zwakke rekenaars in het getallengebied tot 100 - een onderwijsexperiment. [Jumping ahead. A productive program for weak learners in the number domain up to 100. A teaching experiment.] Utrecht, CD-β Press/Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University.
9. Niss, M. (1999). Aspects of the nature and state of research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40, 1-24.
10. Sherman, J., & Bisanz, J. (2007). Evidence for use of mathematical inversion by three-year-old children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8, 333-344.
11. Teppo, A., & Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2007). Mathe-didactical analysis: A crucial component of task design. Paper presented at Mathematical Thinking: An Interdisciplinary Workshop University of Nottingham, November 21-22.
12. Treffers, A. (1987). Three dimensions. A model of goal and theory description in mathematics instruction - the Wiskobas Project. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
13. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (1996). Assessment and realistic mathematics education. Utrecht, the Netherlands: CD-β Press/Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University.
14. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Teppo, A. (2007). Tasks, teaching sequences, longitudinal trajectories: about micro didactics and macro didactics. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, p. 293). Seoul: PME.
15. Veltman, A. (1993). Van het begin of van het eind. [From the beginning or from the end.] Master thesis. Utrecht University.
16. Veltman, A., & Treffers, A. (1995). Midden tussen de getallen. [In between two numbers.] Willem Bartjens, 2, 20-23.
17. Wittmann, E. (1984). Teaching units as the integrating core of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 25-36.