Combinatorial coding of Drosophila muscle shape by Collier and Nautilus

Developmental Biology

Volumn 363, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 27-39

  Enriquez, Jonathan ^b   de Taffin, Mathilde ^a   Crozatier, Michèle ^a   Vincent, Alain ^a   Dubois, Laurence ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PAUL SABATIER   (France)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Collier EBF; Muscle attachment sites; Muscle progenitors; Myogenesis; Nautilus MyoD

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR COLLIER; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NAUTILUS; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELLS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROSOPHILA; EMBRYO; EMBRYO PATTERN FORMATION; MORPHOGENESIS; MUSCLE DEVELOPMENT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TENDON; TENDON CELL; TISSUE SPECIFICITY;

NAUTILUS;

EID: 84857034453     PISSN: 00121606     EISSN: 1095564X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.12.018     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Bahri S.M., Choy J.M., Manser E., Lim L., Yang X. The Drosophila homologue of Arf-GAP GIT1, dGIT, is required for proper muscle morphogenesis and guidance during embryogenesis. Dev. Biol. 2009, 325:15-23.
2. Balagopalan L., Keller C.A., Abmayr S.M. Loss-of-function mutations reveal that the Drosophila nautilus gene is not essential for embryonic myogenesis or viability. Dev. Biol. 2001, 231:374-382.
3. Bate M. The mesoderm and its derivatives. The Development of Drosophila melanogaster 1993, Vol. 2:1013. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory press. M. Bate, A. Martinez Arias (Eds.).
4. Bate M., Rushton E. Myogenesis and muscle patterning in Drosophila. C. R. Acad. Sci. Ser. III 1993, 316:1047-1061.
5. Bate M., Rushton E., Frasch M. A dual requirement for neurogenic genes in Drosophila myogenesis. Dev. Suppl. 1993, 149-161.
6. Baumgardt M., Miguel-Aliaga I., Karlsson D., Ekman H., Thor S. Specification of neuronal identities by feedforward combinatorial coding. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e37.
7. Baylies M.K., Bate M. Twist: a myogenic switch in Drosophila. Science 1996, 272:1481-1484.
8. Baylies M.K., Michelson A.M. Invertebrate myogenesis: looking back to the future of muscle development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2001, 11:431-439.
9. Baylies M.K., Bate M., Ruiz Gomez M. Myogenesis: a view from Drosophila. Cell 1998, 93:921-927.
10. Becker S., Pasca G., Strumpf D., Min L., Volk T. Reciprocal signaling between Drosophila epidermal muscle attachment cells and their corresponding muscles. Development 1997, 124:2615-2622.
11. Beckett K., Baylies M.K. 3D analysis of founder cell and fusion competent myoblast arrangements outlines a new model of myoblast fusion. Dev. Biol. 2007, 309:113-125.
12. Bischof J., Maeda R.K., Hediger M., Karch F., Basler K. An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific phiC31 integrases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:3312-3317.
13. Bokel C., Brown N.H. Integrins in development: moving on, responding to, and sticking to the extracellular matrix. Dev. Cell 2002, 3:311-321.
14. Bourgouin C., Lundgren S.E., Thomas J.B. Apterous is a Drosophila LIM domain gene required for the development of a subset of embryonic muscles. Neuron 1992, 9:549-561.
15. Buff E., Carmena A., Gisselbrecht S., Jimenez F., Michelson A.M. Signalling by the Drosophila epidermal growth factor receptor is required for the specification and diversification of embryonic muscle progenitors. Development 1998, 125:2075-2086.
16. Callahan C.A., Bonkovsky J.L., Scully A.L., Thomas J.B. derailed is required for muscle attachment site selection in Drosophila. Development 1996, 122:2761-2767.
17. Carmena A., Bate M., Jimenez F. Lethal of scute, a proneural gene, participates in the specification of muscle progenitors during Drosophila embryogenesis. Genes Dev. 1995, 9:2373-2383.
18. Carmena A., Gisselbrecht S., Harrison J., Jimenez F., Michelson A.M. Combinatorial signaling codes for the progressive determination of cell fates in the Drosophila embryonic mesoderm. Genes Dev. 1998, 12:3910-3922.
19. Cox V.T., Baylies M.K. Specification of individual Slouch muscle progenitors in Drosophila requires sequential Wingless signaling. Development 2005, 132:713-724.
20. Crozatier M., Vincent A. Requirement for the Drosophila COE transcription factor Collier in formation of an embryonic muscle: transcriptional response to notch signalling. Development 1999, 126:1495-1504.
21. Crozatier M., Vincent A. Control of multidendritic neuron differentiation in Drosophila: the role of Collier. Dev. Biol. 2008, 315:232-242.
22. Crozatier M., Valle D., Dubois L., Ibnsouda S., Vincent A. Collier, a novel regulator of Drosophila head development, is expressed in a single mitotic domain. Curr. Biol. 1996, 6:707-718.
23. Crozatier M., Valle D., Dubois L., Ibnsouda S., Vincent A. Head versus trunk patterning in the Drosophila embryo; Collier requirement for formation of the intercalary segment. Development 1999, 126:4385-4394.
24. Daburon V., Mella S., Plouhinec J.L., Mazan S., Crozatier M., Vincent A. The metazoan history of the COE transcription factors. Selection of variant HLH motif by mandatory inclusion of a duplicated exon in vertebrates. BMC Evol. Biol. 2008, 8:131.
25. Dohrmann C., Azpiazu N., Frasch M. A new Drosophila homeo box gene is expressed in mesodermal precursor cells of distinct muscles during embryogenesis. Genes Dev. 1990, 4:2098-2111.
26. Duan H., Zhang C., Chen J., Sink H., Frei E., Noll M. A key role of Pox meso in somatic myogenesis of Drosophila. Development 2007, 134:3985-3997.
27. Dubois L., Vincent A. The COE-Collier/Olf1/EBF-transcription factors: structural conservation and diversity of developmental functions. Mech. Dev. 2001, 108:3-12.
28. Dubois L., Enriquez J., Daburon V., Crozet F., Lebreton G., Crozatier M., Vincent A. Collier transcription in a single Drosophila muscle lineage: the combinatorial control of muscle identity. Development 2007, 134:4347-4355.
29. Enriquez J., Vincent A. Segmental variations in the patterns of somatic muscles: what roles for Hox?. Fly (Austin) 2010, 4.
30. Enriquez J., Boukhatmi H., Dubois L., Philippakis A.A., Bulyk M.L., Michelson A.M., Crozatier M., Vincent A. Multi-step control of muscle diversity by Hox proteins in the Drosophila embryo. Development 2010, 137:457-466.
31. Frasch M. Controls in patterning and diversification of somatic muscles during Drosophila embryogenesis. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1999, 9:522-529.
32. Gaul U., Seifert E., Schuh R., Jackle H. Analysis of Kruppel protein distribution during early Drosophila development reveals posttranscriptional regulation. Cell 1987, 50:639-647.
33. Green Y.S., Vetter M.L. EBF proteins participate in transcriptional regulation of Xenopus muscle development. Dev. Biol. 2011, 358:240-250.
34. Greig S., Akam M. Homeotic genes autonomously specify one aspect of pattern in the Drosophila mesoderm. Nature 1993, 362:630-632.
35. Jagla T., Bidet Y., Da Ponte J.P., Dastugue B., Jagla K. Cross-repressive interactions of identity genes are essential for proper specification of cardiac and muscular fates in Drosophila. Development 2002, 129:1037-1047.
36. Keller C.A., Grill M.A., Abmayr S.M. A role for nautilus in the differentiation of muscle precursors. Dev. Biol. 1998, 202:157-171.
37. Kidd T., Bland K.S., Goodman C.S. Slit is the midline repellent for the robo receptor in Drosophila. Cell 1999, 96:785-794.
38. Knirr S., Azpiazu N., Frasch M. The role of the NK-homeobox gene slouch (S59) in somatic muscle patterning. Development 1999, 126:4525-4535.
39. Krzemien J., Dubois L., Makki R., Meister M., Vincent A., Crozatier M. Control of blood cell homeostasis in Drosophila larvae by the posterior signalling centre. Nature 2007, 446:325-328.
40. Lilly B., Galewsky S., Firulli A.B., Schulz R.A., Olson E.N. D-MEF2: a MADS box transcription factor expressed in differentiating mesoderm and muscle cell lineages during Drosophila embryogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994, 91:5662-5666.
41. Lord P.C., Lin M.H., Hales K.H., Storti R.V. Normal expression and the effects of ectopic expression of the Drosophila muscle segment homeobox (msh) gene suggest a role in differentiation and patterning of embryonic muscles. Dev. Biol. 1995, 171:627-640.
42. Michelson A.M., Abmayr S.M., Bate M., Arias A.M., Maniatis T. Expression of a MyoD family member prefigures muscle pattern in Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev. 1990, 4:2086-2097.
43. Misquitta L., Paterson B.M. Targeted disruption of gene function in Drosophila by RNA interference (RNA-i): a role for nautilus in embryonic somatic muscle formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999, 96:1451-1456.
44. Nguyen H.T., Bodmer R., Abmayr S.M., McDermott J.C., Spoerel N.A. D-mef2: a Drosophila mesoderm-specific MADS box-containing gene with a biphasic expression profile during embryogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994, 91:7520-7524.
45. Nose A., Isshiki T., Takeichi M. Regional specification of muscle progenitors in Drosophila: the role of the msh homeobox gene. Development 1998, 125:215-223.
46. Paterson B.M., Walldorf U., Eldridge J., Dubendorfer A., Frasch M., Gehring W.J. The Drosophila homologue of vertebrate myogenic-determination genes encodes a transiently expressed nuclear protein marking primary myogenic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1991, 88:3782-3786.
47. Peter I.S., Davidson E.H. Evolution of gene regulatory networks controlling body plan development. Cell 2011, 144:970-985.
48. Romani S., Jimenez F., Hoch M., Patel N.H., Taubert H., Jackle H. Kruppel, a Drosophila segmentation gene, participates in the specification of neurons and glial cells. Mech. Dev. 1996, 60:95-107.
49. Ruiz Gomez M., Bate M. Segregation of myogenic lineages in Drosophila requires numb. Development 1997, 124:4857-4866.
50. Ruiz-Gomez M., Romani S., Hartmann C., Jackle H., Bate M. Specific muscle identities are regulated by Kruppel during Drosophila embryogenesis. Development 1997, 124:3407-3414.
51. Sambasivan R., Tajbakhsh S. Skeletal muscle stem cell birth and properties. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2007, 18:870-882.
52. Sambasivan R., Kuratani S., Tajbakhsh S. An eye on the head: the development and evolution of craniofacial muscles. Development 2011, 138:2401-2415.
53. Schnorrer F., Dickson B.J. Muscle building; mechanisms of myotube guidance and attachment site selection. Dev. Cell 2004, 7:9-20.
54. Schnorrer F., Kalchhauser I., Dickson B.J. The transmembrane protein Kon-tiki couples to Dgrip to mediate myotube targeting in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 2007, 12:751-766.
55. Schweitzer R., Zelzer E., Volk T. Connecting muscles to tendons: tendons and musculoskeletal development in flies and vertebrates. Development 2010, 137:2807-2817.
56. Stolfi A., Gainous T.B., Young J.J., Mori A., Levine M., Christiaen L. Early chordate origins of the vertebrate second heart field. Science 2010, 329:565-568.
57. Swan L.E., Wichmann C., Prange U., Schmid A., Schmidt M., Schwarz T., Ponimaskin E., Madeo F., Vorbruggen G., Sigrist S.J. A glutamate receptor-interacting protein homolog organizes muscle guidance in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 2004, 18:223-237.
58. Tixier V., Bataille L., Jagla K. Diversification of muscle types: recent insights from Drosophila. Exp. Cell Res. 2010, 316:3019-3027.
59. Vervoort M., Crozatier M., Valle D., Vincent A. The COE transcription factor Collier is a mediator of short-range Hedgehog-induced patterning of the Drosophila wing. Curr. Biol. 1999, 9:632-639.
60. Volk T., VijayRaghavan K. A central role for epidermal segment border cells in the induction of muscle patterning in the Drosophila embryo. Development 1994, 120:59-70.
61. Volohonsky G., Edenfeld G., Klambt C., Volk T. Muscle-dependent maturation of tendon cells is induced by post-transcriptional regulation of stripeA. Development 2007, 134:347-356.
62. Wei Q., Rong Y., Paterson B.M. Stereotypic founder cell patterning and embryonic muscle formation in Drosophila require nautilus (MyoD) gene function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:5461-5466.
63. Weintraub H., Tapscott S.J., Davis R.L., Thayer M.J., Adam M.A., Lassar A.B., Miller A.D. Activation of muscle-specific genes in pigment, nerve, fat, liver, and fibroblast cell lines by forced expression of MyoD. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1989, 86:5434-5438.
64. Yarnitzky T., Min L., Volk T. The Drosophila neuregulin homolog Vein mediates inductive interactions between myotubes and their epidermal attachment cells. Genes Dev. 1997, 11:2691-2700.