Estimating local and regional population sizes for an endangered minnow, redside dace (Clinostomus elongatus), in Canada

Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 47-57

  Poos, Mark ^a,b   Lawrie, David ^c   Tu, Christine ^c   Jackson, Donald A ^a   Mandrak, Nicholas E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b GREAT LAKES LABORATORY FOR FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES   (Canada)

^c Toronto Region Conservation Authority   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Endangered species; Freshwater ecology; Great Lakes; Population estimate; Redside dace (Clinostomus elongatus); Urbanization

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CATCHMENT; CONNECTIVITY; CYPRINID; ENDANGERED SPECIES; EPISODIC EVENT; ESTIMATION METHOD; EXTINCTION RISK; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; LAND USE CHANGE; MARK-RECAPTURE METHOD; POPULATION DECLINE; POPULATION SIZE; POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS; SPECIES CONSERVATION; TRIBUTARY; URBANIZATION;

CANADA; GREAT LAKES [NORTH AMERICA]; LAURENTIAN MOUNTAINS; QUEBEC [CANADA];

CLINOSTOMUS; CLINOSTOMUS ELONGATUS; CYPRINIDAE; PISCES;

EID: 84857032014     PISSN: 10527613     EISSN: 10990755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.1235     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. ABCA. 2009. Management plan for the Bayfield North watersheds (Draft). The Ausable Bayfield Conservation Authority, Exeter, Ontario. Available online: .
2. Andersen JJ. 2002. Status of redside dace, Clinostomus elongatus, in the Lynde and Pringle Creek Watersheds of Lake Ontario. Canadian Field Naturalist 116: 76-80.
3. Bohl RJ, Henry TB, Strange RJ, Rakes PL. 2009. Effects of electroshock on cyprinid embryos: implications for threatened and endangered fishes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138: 768-776.
4. Carle FL, Strub MR. 1978. A new method for estimating population size from removal data. Biometrics 34: 621-630.
5. Chao A, Huggins R. 2005. Modern closed population capture-recapture models. In Handbook of Capture-Recapture Analysis, Amstrup S, McDonald T, Manly B (eds). Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ; 58-87.
6. COSEWIC. 2007. COSEWIC Assessment and update status report on the redside dace Clinostomus elongatus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada: Ottawa, ON.
7. Cowx IG. 1983. Review of the methods for estimating fish population size from survey removal data. Fisheries Management 14: 67-82.
8. Daniels RA, Wisniewski SJ. 1994. Feeding ecology of redside dace, Clinostomus elongatus. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 3: 176-183.
9. Eberhardt LL. 1969. Population estimates from recapture frequencies. Journal of Wildlife Management 33: 28-39.
10. Hazelton PD, Grossman GD. 2009. Turbidity, velocity and interspecific interactions affect foraging behaviour of Rosyside Dace (Clinostomus funduloides) and Yellowfin Shiners (Notropis lutippinis). Ecology of Freshwater Fish 18: 427-436.
11. Hilton-Taylor C, Mace GM, Capper DR, Collar NJ, Stuart SN, Bibby CJ, Pollock C, Thomsen JB. 2000. Assessment mismatches must be sorted out: they leave species at risk. Nature 404: 541-541.
12. Koster WJ. 1939. Some phases in the life history and relationships of the cyprinid Clinostomus elongatus (Kirtland). Copeia 1939: 201-208.
13. Legendre P. 2011. Package 'lmodel2'. R library. Available online at: . Accessed: August 5, 2011.
14. Lukey JR, Crawford SS. 2009. Consistency of COSEWIC species at risk designations: freshwater fishes as a case study. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 66: 959-971.
15. Mandrak NE, Cudmore B. 2010. The fall of native fishes and the rise of non-native fishes in the Great Lakes Basin. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 13: 255-268.
16. McKee PM, Parker BJ. 1982. The distribution biology and status of the fishes Campostoma anomalum, Clinostomus elongatus, Notropis photogenis (Cyprinidae), and Fundulus notatus (Cyprinodontidae) in Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology 60: 1347-1358.
17. Newcombe CP, Jensen JOT. 1996. Channel suspended sediment and fisheries: a synthesis for quantitative assessment of risk and impact. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 16: 693-727.
18. Novinger DC, Coon TG. 2000. Behavior and physiology of the redside dace, Clinostomus elongatus, a threatened species in Michigan. Environmental Biology of Fishes 57: 315-326.
19. Ogle DH. 2008. Fisheries stock assessment (FSA) methods package for R. R package version 0.0-14. [June 23 2011].
20. OMNR. 2008. Southern Ontario Land Resource Information System (SOLRIS) Phase 2 - Data Specifications. Version 1.2. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Science and Information Branch, Peterborough, Ontario.
21. Philips CT, Fries JN. 2009. An evaluation of visible implant elastomer for marking the federally listed fountain darter and San Marcos salamander. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 29: 529-532.
22. Poos MS, Mandrak NE, McLaughlin RL. 2007. The effectiveness of two common sampling methods for assessing imperiled freshwater fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 70: 691-708.
23. R Development Core Team. 2009. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. (ISBN: 3-900051-07-0).
24. RDRT - Redside Dace Recovery Team. 2010. Recovery strategy for redside dace (Clinostomus elongatus) in Ontario. Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, ON.
25. Reid SM, Jones NE, Yunker G. 2008. Evaluation of single-pass electrofishing and rapid habitat assessment for monitoring redside dace. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28: 50-56.
26. Reynolds JB. 1996. Electrofishing. In Fisheries Techniques, Murphy BR, Willis DW (eds). American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD; 221-253.
27. Ricciardi A, Rasmussen JB. 2001. Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conservation Biology 13: 1220-1222.
28. Roberts JH, Angermeier PL. 2004. A comparison of injectable fluorescent marks in two genera of darters: effects on survival and retention rates. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 24: 1017-1024.
29. Roy AH, Freeman MC, Freeman BJ, Wenger SJ, Ensign WE, Meyer JL. 2005. Investigating hydrologic alteration as a mechanism of fish assemblage shifts in urbanizing streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24: 656-678.
30. Rumman N, Lin G, Li J. 2005. Investigation of GIS-based surface hydrological modelling for identifying infiltration zones in an urban watershed. Environmental Informatics Archives 3: 315-322.
31. Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke F, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, et al. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year. Science 287: 1770-1774.
32. Schwartz FJ, Norvell J. 1958. Food, growth and sexual dimorphism of the redside dace Clinostomus elongatus (Kirtland) in Linesville Creek, Crawford County, Pennsylvania. The Ohio Journal of Science 58: 311-316.
33. Scott WB, Crossman EJ. 1998. Freshwater Fishes of Canada. Galt House Publications Ltd: Oakville, ON.
34. Seber GAF. 1982. The Estimation of Animal Abundance, 2nd edn. Edward Arnold: London.
35. Stone J, McGree M, Whitesel TA. 2006. Detection of uncured visible implant elastomer tags in larval Pacific lampreys. North American Journal for Fisheries Management 26: 142-146.
36. Thompson WL. 2004. Sampling Rare or Elusive Species. Island Press: Washington, DC.
37. TRCA. 2009. Don River watershed plan. Toronto Region Conservation Authority, Toronto, Ontario. [December 2, 2009].
38. Velez-Espino LA, Koops MA. 2008. Recovery potential assessment of redside dace (Clinostomus elongatus) in Canada. Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Research Document. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
39. Wainio A, Hester R. 1973. The Fish of the Humber River Watershed. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources: Maple, ON.
40. Wenger SJ, Peterson JT, Freeman MC, Freeman BJ, Homans DD. 2008. Stream fish occurrence in response to impervious cover, historic land use, and hydrogeomorphic factors. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 65: 1250-1264.
41. White G. 2005. Correcting wildlife counts using detection probabilities. Wildlife Research 32: 211-216.
42. Zamor RM, Grossman GD. 2007. Turbidity affects foraging success of drift-feeding Rosyside Dace. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136: 167-176.
43. Zippin C. 1956. An evaluation of the removal method of estimating animal populations. Biometrics 12: 163-189.
44. Zippin C. 1958. The removal method population and estimation. Journal of Wildlife Management 22: 82-90.