Vemus - Feedback and groupware technologies for music instrument learning

Proceedings of the 4th Sound and Music Computing Conference, SMC 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 117-123

  Fober, D ^a   Letz, S ^a   Orlarey, Y ^a  

^a Grame Centre National de Création Musicale   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER SCIENCE;

EUROPEAN RESEARCH PROJECT; FEEDBACK TECHNOLOGY; GROUPWARE TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATIVE APPROACHES; INTERMEDIATE LEVEL; WIND INSTRUMENTS;

GROUPWARE;

EID: 84856995569     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Anna Rita Adessi and François Pachet. Experiments with a musical machine: musical style replication in 3 to 5 year old children. British Journal of Music Education, 22(1): 21-46, 2005.
2. Roberto Bresin. What is the color of that music performance? In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, pages 367-370. ICMA, 2005.
3. S. Ferguson, A. V. Moere, and D. Cabrera. Seeing sound: real-time sound visualisation in visual feedback loops used for training musicians. In InformationVisualisation, 2005. Proceedings. Ninth International Conference on, pages 97-102. IEEE, July 2005.
4. Sam Ferguson. Learning musical instrument skills through interactive sonification. In Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME06), pages 384-389. IRCAM, June 2006.
5. D. Fober, S. Letz, Y. Orlarey, A. Askenfeld, K. Falkenberg Hansen, and E. Schoonderwaldt. Imutus-an interactive music tuition system. In Proceedings of the first Sound and Music Computing conference-SMC'04, pages 97-103. IRCAM, 2004.
6. A. Friberg, E. Schoonderwaldt, P. Juslin, and R. Bresin. Automatic real-time extraction of musical expression. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, pages 365-367. ICMA, 2002.
7. Rumi Hiraga and Noriyuki Matsuda. Visualization of music performance as an aid to listener's comprehension. In Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, pages 103-106, May 2004.
8. Rumi Hiraga, Reiko Mizaki, and Issei Fujishiro. Performance visualization: a new challenge to music through visualization. In Proceedings of the tenthACMinternational conference on Multimedia, pages 239-242, December 2002.
9. David M. Howard. Technology for real-time visual feedback in singing lessons. Research Studies in Music Education, (24): 40-57, 2005.
10. Andrew Johnston, Shigeki Amitani, and Ernest Edmonds. Amplifying reflective thinking in musical performance. In Proceedings of the 5th conference on Creativity & cognition, pages 166-175, April 2005.
11. Patrick N. Juslin and Roland S. Persson. Emotional communication. In The Science and Psychology of Music Performance, pages 219-236. Oxford University Press, 2002.
12. Glenn E. Krasner and Stephen T. Pope. A cookbook for using the model-view controller user interface paradigm in smalltalk-80. J. Object Oriented Program., 1(3): 26-49, 1988.
13. J. Langner andW. Goebl. Visualising expressive performance in tempo-loundness space. Computer Music Journal, 27(4): 69-83, 2003.
14. Philip McLeod and Geoff Wyvill. Visualization of musical pitch. In Computer Graphics International 2003, 2003.
15. Stephanie Pitts. 'testing, testing. ' how do students use written feedback? Active learning in higher education, 6(3): 218-229, 2005.
16. Stephanie Pitts, Jane Davidson, and Gary McPherson. Developing effective practise strategies: case studies of three young instrumentalists. Music Education Research, 2(1): 45-56, 2000.
17. S. Raptis, A. Chalamandaris, A. Baxevanis, A. Askenfeld, E. Schoonderwaldt, K. Falkenberg Hansen, D. Fober, S. Letz, and Y. Orlarey. Imutus-an effective practicing environment for music tuition. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, pages 383-386. ICMA, 2005.
18. Erwin Schoonderwaldt, Anders Askenfelt, and Kjetil Falkenberg Hansen. Design and implementation of automatic evaluation of recorder performance in imutus. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, pages 431-434. ICMA, 2005.
19. Stephen W. Smoliar, John A. Waterworth, and Peter R. Kellock. pianoforte: a system for piano education beyond notation literacy. In Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Multimedia, January 1995.
20. Graham F. Welch, David M. Howard, Evangelos Himonides, and Jude Brereton. Real-time feedback in the singing studio: an innovatory action-research project using new voice technology. Music Education Research, 7(2): 225-249, July 2005.