Comparison of age-derived lens thickness to optically measured lens thickness in IOL power calculation: A clinical study

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 154-155

  Lam, Sheridan ^a  

^a DuPage Ophthalmology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CORNEA CURVATURE; CORNEA THICKNESS; EYE EXAMINATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LENS POWER; LENS SIZE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFLECTOMETRY; REFRACTION ERROR; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; BIOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERFEROMETRY; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENS, CRYSTALLINE; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; LIGHT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTICS AND PHOTONICS; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 84856982004     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: 19382391     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20111209-01     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Holzer MP, Mamausa M, Auffarth GU. Accuracy of a new partial coherence interferometry analyser for biometric measurements. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(6):807-810.
2. Rabsilber TM, Jepsen C, Auffarth GU, Holzer MP. Intraocular lens power calculation: clinical comparison of 2 optical biometry devices. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(2):230-234.
3. Rohrer K, Frueh BE, Wälti R, Clemetson IA, Tappeiner C, Goldblum D. Comparison and evaluation of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence refl ectometer. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(11):2087-2092.
4. Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Shah S, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Berrow EJ. A new optical low coherence refl ectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(7):949-953.
5. Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G. Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(4):644-648.
6. Liampa Z, Kynlgopoulos M, Pallas G, Gerding H. Comparison of two partial coherence interferometry devices for ocular biometry. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2010;227(4):285-288.
7. Bissman W. IOLMaster with Software Version V3.0. Zeiss Web site. http://www.zeiss.de/C125679E00525939/EmbedTitelIntern/IOLMasterNewSoftware/ $File/iolepdfz.pdf. Accessed October 1, 2011.
8. Hoffer KJ. Axial dimension of the human cataractous lens. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111(7):914-918. Erratum in Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111(12):1626. (Pubitemid 23208795)
9. Olsen T. Prediction of the effective postoperative (intraocular lens) anterior chamber depth. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(3):419-424.
10. Lam S, Gupta BK, Hahn JM, Manastersky NA. Refractive outcomes after cataract surgery: Scheimpfl ug keratometry versus standard automated keratometry in virgin corneas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(11):1984-1987.
11. Wakil JS. Wavefront by method of ray tracing. Tracey Technologies Web site. http://www.traceytechnologies.com/resources-presentations.htm. Accessed December 6, 2011.