Refractive outcomes after cataract surgery: Scheimpflug keratometry versus standard automated keratometry in virgin corneas

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 37, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1984-1987

  Lam, Sheridan ^a   Gupta, Balaji K ^a   Hahn, John M ^a   Manastersky, Natalka A ^a  

^a DuPage Ophthalmology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED KERATOMETRY; BIOMETRY; CASE STUDY; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; ECHOOCULOGRAPHY; EYE REFRACTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATOMETRY; LENS IMPLANT; LENS POWER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; POSTERIOR EYE CHAMBER; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVATE PRACTICE; PUPIL; REFRACTION ERROR; SCHEIMPFLUG HOLLADAY EQUIVALENT KERATOMETRY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMETRY; CORNEA; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PSEUDOPHAKIA; PUPIL; REFRACTION, OCULAR; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 80054811219     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: 18734502     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.031     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. S. Norrby Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation J Cataract Refract Surg 34 2008 368 376 (Pubitemid 351625583)
2. H.J.F. Shammas A comparison of immersion and contact techniques for axial length measurements Am Intra-Ocular Implant Soc J 10 1984 444 447
3. L.G. Artaria Messung der Bulbuslänge mit verschiedenen Ultraschall-Geräten [Axial length measurements with different ultrasonic devices] Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 188 1986 492 494 (Pubitemid 16122019)
4. J. Schelenz, and J. Kammann Comparison of contact and immersion techniques for axial measurement and implant power calculation J Cataract Refract Surg 15 1989 425 428 (Pubitemid 19193480)
5. T. Olsen, and P.J. Nielsen Immersion versus contact technique in the measurement of axial length by ultrasound Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 67 1989 101 102 (Pubitemid 19110462)
6. A. Watson, and R. Armstrong Contact or immersion technique for axial length measurement? Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 27 1999 49 51 Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1440-1606.1999.00162.x/pdf Accessed June 30, 2011 (Pubitemid 29166667)
7. E. Borasio Pentacam keratometry and IOL power calculation [reply to letter by S Norrby] J Cataract Refract Surg 34 2008 4 (Pubitemid 350299799)
8. H. Shankar, D. Taranath, C. Santhirathelagan, and K. Pesudovs Anterior segment biometry with the Pentacam: comprehensive assessment of repeatability of automated measurements J Cataract Refractive Surg 34 2008 103 113 (Pubitemid 350299777)
9. H.J. Shammas, K.J. Hoffer, and M.C. Shammas Scheimpflug photography keratometry readings for routine intraocular lens power calculation J Cataract Refract Surg 35 2009 330 334
10. R.J. Symes, and P.G. Ursell Automated keratometry in routine cataract surgery: comparison of Scheimpflug and conventional values J Cataract Refract Surg 37 2011 295 301
11. Q. Tang, K.J. Hoffer, M.D. Olson, and K.M. Miller Accuracy of Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry readings after corneal refractive surgery J Cataract Refract Surg 35 2009 1198 1203
12. E. Borasio, J. Stevens, and G.T. Smith Estimation of the true corneal power after keratorefractive surgery in eyes requiring cataract surgery: BESSt formula J Cataract Refract Surg 32 2006 2004 2014 (Pubitemid 44809598)
13. R.J. Symes, M.J. Say, and P.G. Ursell Scheimpflug keratometry versus conventional automated keratometry in routine cataract surgery J Cataract Refract Surg 36 2010 1107 1114 erratum 2011; 37:980
14. Q. Tang, K.J. Hoffer, M.D. Olson, and K.M. Miller [Reply to letter Holladay JT. Accuracy of Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry readings after corneal refractive surgery] J Cataract Refract Surg 36 2010 183 184
15. D.L. DiLalla, and S.J. Dollinger Cleaning up data and running preliminary analyses F.T.L. Leong, J.T. Austin, The Psychology Research Handbook; A Guide for Graduate Students and Research Assistants 2nd ed 2006 Sage Inc Thousand Oaks, CA 241 253
16. G. Savini, P. Barboni, M. Carbonelli, and K.J. Hoffer Accuracy of Scheimpflug corneal power measurements for intraocular lens power calculation J Cataract Refract Surg 35 2009 1193 1197 erratum, 1483
17. S. Norrby Pentacam keratometry and IOL power calculation [letter] J Cataract Refract Surg 34 2008 3 (Pubitemid 350299762)