Future patients? Telehealthcare, roles and responsibilities

Health and Social Care in the Community

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 86-95

  Finch, Tracy L ^a   Mort, Maggie ^b   Mair, Frances S ^c   May, Carl R ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ICTs; Patients; Technologies; Telecare; Telehealthcare; Telemedicine

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; ROLE PLAYING; SELF CARE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TELEMEDICINE; UNITED KINGDOM; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; ROLE; SELF CARE; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 37549066964     PISSN: 09660410     EISSN: 13652524     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00726.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ball M.J. Lillis J. (2001) E-health: transforming the physician/patient relationship. International Journal of Medical Informatics 61 (1 1 10.
2. Bareiss W. (2001) Telemedicine in South Dakota: a cultural studies approach. New Media and Society 3 (3 327 355.
3. Berg M. (2002) Patients and professionals in the information society: what might keep us awake in 2013. International Journal of Medical Informatics 66, 31 37.
4. Cornford T. Klecun-Dabrowska E. (2001) Telehealth technology: consequences for structure through use. Medinfo 98, 1140 1144.
5. Fieschi M. (2002) Information technology is changing the way society sees health care delivery. International Journal of Medical Informatics 66 (1-3 85 93.
6. Finch T., May C., Mair F., Mort M. Gask L. (2003) Integrating service development with evaluation in telehealthcare: an ethnographic study. British Medical Journal 327 (7425 1205 1209.
7. Finch T., May C., Mort M. Mair F. (2006) Telemedicine, telecare, and the future patient: innovation, risk and governance. In : A. Webster (Ed.) New Technologies in Health Care: Challenge, Change and Innovation, pp. 84 96. Palgrave, Basingstoke.
8. Gann B. (1998) Empowering the patient and public through information technology. In : J. Lenaghan (ed.) Rethinking IT and Health, pp. 123 138. Institute for Public Policy Research, London.
9. Glaser B.G. (1965) The constant comparative methods of qualitative analysis. Social Problems 12, 436 445.
10. Haux R., Ammenwerth E., Herzog W. Knaup P. (2002) Health care in the information society. A prognosis for the year 2013. International Journal of Medical Informatics 66 (1-3 3 21.
11. Health D.O. (2002) Delivering 21st Century IT Support for the NHS. Department of Health, London.
12. Hersh W.R., Helfand M., Wallace J., Kraemer D., Patterson P., Shapiro S. Greenlick M. (2001) Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions: a systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1 (5). [WWW document] URL http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/1/5.
13. Klecun-Dabrowska E. Cornford T. (2000) Telehealth acquires meanings: information and communication technologies within health policy. Information Systems Journal 10 (1 41 63.
14. Lehoux P., Saint-Arnaud J. Richard L. (2004) The use of technology at home: what patient manuals say and sell vs. what patients face and fear. Sociology of Health and Illness 26 (5 617 644.
15. Lenaghan J. (1998) Rethinking IT and Health. Institute for Public Policy Research, London.
16. Mair F. Whitten P. (2000) Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. British Medical Journal 320 (7248 1517 1520.
17. May C., Mort M., Mair F., Ellis N.T. Gask L. (2000) Evaluation of new technologies in health care systems: what's the context? Health Informatics Journal 6, 64 68.
18. May C., Gask L., Atkinson T., Ellis N., Mair F. Esmail A. (2001) Resisting and promoting new technologies in clinical practice: the case of telepsychiatry. Social Science and Medicine 52 (12 1889 1901.
19. May C., Finch T., Mair F. Mort M. (2005) Towards a wireless patient: chronic illness, scarce care and technological innovation in the United Kingdom. Social Science & Medicine 61, 1485 1494.
20. Miller A.E. (2003) The technical and interpersonal aspects of telemedicine: effects on doctor-patient communication. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 9, 1 7.
21. Mort M. Finch T. (2005) Principles for telemedicine and telecare: the perspective of a citizens' panel. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 11 (Suppl. 1 S66 S68.
22. Roberts R. Rigby M. (1998) The need for a holistic view of telemedicine, focused on patients and society as prime stakeholders. In : B. Cesnik, A.T. McCray J.-R. Scherrer, (Eds) MedInfo '98, Proceedings of MedInfo '98, Seoul, Korea, pp. 1204 1208. IOS Press, Amsterdam.
23. Sicotte C. Lehoux P. (2003) Teleconsultation: rejected and emerging uses. Methods of Information in Medicine 42 (4 451 457.
24. Urquhart C., Currell R., Lewis R. Wainwright P. (1999) Evaluating telemedicine: indications from a systematic review, pp. 186 191. Healthcare Computing 99 (Conference), Current perspectives in healthcare computing 1999, Harrogate, UK, 22-24 March.
25. Whitten P., Davenport Sypher B. Patterson J.D. (2000) Transcending the technology of telemedicine: an analysis of telemedicine in North Carolina. Health Communication 12 (2 109 135.
26. Whitten P.S. Mair F. (2000) Telemedicine and patient satisfaction: current status and future directions. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health 6 (4 417 423.
27. Williams T., May C., Esmail A., Ellis N. Griffiths C. (2001) Patient satisfaction with store-and-forward teledermatology. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 7 (Suppl. 1 S45 S46.
28. Williams T.L., May C.R. Esmail A. (2002) Limitations of patient satisfaction studies in telehealthcare: a systematic review of the literature. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health 7 (4 293 316.