Exploration of structural stability in deleterious nsSNPs of the XPA gene: A molecular dynamics approach

Journal of Carcinogenesis

Volumn 10, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Nagasundaram, N ^a   George Priya Doss, C ^a  

^a VIT UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

I Mutant; molecular dynamics; PANTHER; polyphen; SIFT; XPA

Indexed keywords

XERODERMA PIGMENTOSUM GROUP A PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; EXCISION REPAIR; GENE; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; HUMAN; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTANT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM PHENOTYPING METHOD; PROTEIN STABILITY; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SORTING INTOLERANT FROM TOLERANT METHOD;

EID: 84856956997     PISSN: 09746773     EISSN: 14773163     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/1477-3163.90441     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Lin J, Swan GE, Shields PG, Benowitz NL, Gu J, Amos CI, et al. Mutagen sensitivity and genetic variants in nucleotide excision repair pathway: genotype-phenotype correlation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:2065-71. (Pubitemid 47621181)
2. Chasman D, Adams RM. Predicting the functional consequences of non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms: structure-based assessment of amino acid variation. J Mol Biol 2001;307:683-706. (Pubitemid 33027685)
3. Wu X, Zhao H, Wei Q, Amos CI, Zhang K, Guo Z, et al. XPA polymorphism associated with reduced lung cancer risk and a modulating effect on nucleotide excision repair capacity. Carcinogenesis 2003;24:505-9. (Pubitemid 36432647)
4. Park JY, Park SH, Choi JE, Lee SY, Jeon HS, Cha SI, et al. Polymorphisms of the DNA repair gene xeroderma pigmentosum group A and risk of primary lung cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:993-7. (Pubitemid 35192648)
5. Lockett KL, Snowhite IV, Hu JJ. Nucleotide-excision repair and prostate cancer risk. Cancer Lett 2005;220:125-35. (Pubitemid 40568769)
6. Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc 2009;4:1073-81.
7. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 2010;7:248-9.
8. Thomas PD, Campbell MJ, Kejariwal A, Mi H, Karlak B, Daverman R, et al. PANTHER: a library of protein families and subfamilies indexed by function. Genome Res 2003;13:2129-41. (Pubitemid 37161770)
9. Capriotti E, Fariselli P, Casadio R. I-Mutant 2.0: Predicting stability changes upon mutation from the protein sequence or structure. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:306-10.
10. Ikegami T, Kuraoka I, Saijo M, Kodo N, Kyogoku Y, Morikawa K, et al. Solution structure of the DNA-and RPA-binding domain of the human repair factor XPA. Nat Struct Biol 1998;5:701-6. (Pubitemid 28359806)
11. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 1996;14:27-8,33-8.
12. Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E. GROMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 2008;4:435-47.
13. Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Fechner M, Lindahl E, Schmitt UW, de Groot BL, et al. Speeding up parallel GROMACS on high-latency networks. J Comput Chem 2007;28:2075-84. (Pubitemid 47153605)
14. Van Gunsteren WF, Billeter SR, Eising AA, Hunenberger PH, Krüger P, Mark AE, et al. Biomolecular Simulation: The GROMOS96 Manual and User Guide; vdf Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich and BIOMOS b.v: Zurich, Groningen, 1996.
15. Berendsen HJ, Postma JP, van Gunsteren WF, DiNola A, Haak JR. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 1984;81:3684-90.
16. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 1983;79:926.