Evaluation of the menisci of the knee joint using three-dimensional isotropic resolution fast spin-echo imaging: Diagnostic performance in 250 patients with surgical correlation

Skeletal Radiology

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 169-178

  Kijowski, Richard ^a   Davis, Kirkland W ^a   Blankenbaker, Donna G ^a   Woods, Michael A ^a   Del Rio, Alejandro Munoz ^a,b   De Smet, Arthur A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b University of Wisconsin   (United States)

Author keywords

Fast spin echo; Isotropic resolution; Knee; Magnetic resonance imaging; Meniscus

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE ARTHROSCOPY; KNEE MENISCUS; KNEE MENISCUS ANTERIOR HORN; KNEE MENISCUS BODY; KNEE MENISCUS POSTERIOR HORN; KNEE MENISCUS ROOT; KNEE MENISCUS RUPTURE; KNEE SURGERY; LATERAL KNEE MENISCUS RUPTURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDIAL KNEE MENISCUS RUPTURE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL ISOTROPIC RESOLUTION INTERMEDIATE WEIGHTED FAST SPIN ECHO SEQUENCE;

ANISOTROPY; FEMALE; FRACTURES, CARTILAGE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MENISCI, TIBIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPIN LABELS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84856950653     PISSN: 03642348     EISSN: 14322161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-011-1140-4     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. HG Potter JM Linklater AA Allen JA Hannafin SB Haas 1998 Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in the knee. An evaluation with use of fast-spin-echo imaging J Bone Joint Surg Am 80 9 1276 1284 9759811 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvjtVKisw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28443350)
2. AH Sonin RA Pensy ME Mulligan S Hatem 2002 Grading articular cartilage of the knee using fast spin-echo proton density-weighted MR imaging without fat suppression AJR Am J Roentgenol 179 5 1159 1166 12388492 (Pubitemid 35204367)
3. LP Cheung KC Li MD Hollett AG Bergman RJ Herfkens 1997 Meniscal tears of the knee: accuracy of detection with fast spin-echo MR imaging and arthroscopic correlation in 293 patients Radiology 203 2 508 512 9114113 1:STN:280: DyaK2s3mvVOltw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27176230)
4. EM Escobedo JC Hunter GC Zink-Brody AJ Wilson SD Harrison DJ Fisher 1996 Usefulness of turbo spin-echo MR imaging in the evaluation of meniscal tears: comparison with a conventional spin-echo sequence AJR Am J Roentgenol 167 5 1223 1227 8911185 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FmslymtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26376240)
5. TP Ha KC Li CF Beaulieu, et al. 1998 Anterior cruciate ligament injury: fast spin-echo MR imaging with arthroscopic correlation in 217 examinations AJR Am J Roentgenol 170 5 1215 1219 9574587 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3jtlOktg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28210930)
6. EH Oei JJ Nikken AC Verstijnen AZ Ginai MG Myriam Hunink 2003 MR imaging of the menisci and cruciate ligaments: a systematic review Radiology 226 3 837 848 12601211 10.1148/radiol.2263011892 (Pubitemid 36259163)
7. O Ristow L Steinbach G Sabo, et al. 2009 Isotropic 3D fast spin-echo imaging versus standard 2D imaging at 3.0 T of the knee-image quality and diagnostic performance Eur Radiol 19 5 1263 1272 19137309 10.1007/s00330-008- 1260-y
8. GE Gold RF Busse C Beehler, et al. 2007 Isotropic MRI of the knee with 3D fast spin-echo extended echo-train acquisition (XETA): initial experience Am J Roentgenol 188 5 1287 1293 10.2214/AJR.06.1208 (Pubitemid 46668510)
9. R Kijowski KW Davis MA Woods, et al. 2009 Knee joint: comprehensive assessment with 3D isotropic resolution fast spin-echo MR imaging-diagnostic performance compared with that of conventional MR imaging at 3.0 T Radiology 252 2 486 495 19703886 10.1148/radiol.2523090028
10. M Notohamiprodjo A Horng MF Pietschmann, et al. 2009 MRI of the knee at 3 T: first clinical results with an isotropic PDfs-weighted 3D-TSE-sequence Invest Radiol 44 9 585 597 19668001 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b4c1a1
11. RF Busse H Hariharan A Vu JH Brittain 2006 Fast spin echo sequences with very long echo trains: design of variable refocusing flip angle schedules and generation of clinical T2 contrast Magn Reson Med 55 5 1030 1037 16598719 10.1002/mrm.20863
12. RF Busse AC Brau A Vu, et al. 2008 Effects of refocusing flip angle modulation and view ordering in 3D fast spin echo Magn Reson Med 60 3 640 649 18727082 10.1002/mrm.21680
13. JY Jung YC Yoon JW Kwon JH Ahn BK Choe 2009 Diagnosis of internal derangement of the knee at 3.0-T MR imaging: 3D isotropic intermediate-weighted versus 2D sequences Radiology 253 3 780 787 19789228 10.1148/radiol.2533090457
14. Hall M, Lawrence L. Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 1996. Advance data from vital and health statistics, number 300. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1998.
15. AP Newman AU Daniels RT Burks 1993 Principles and decision making in meniscal surgery Arthroscopy 9 1 33 51 8442828 10.1016/S0749-8063(05)80342-1 1:STN:280:DyaK3s7otlamsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 23085997)
16. JN Katz TM Harris MG Larson, et al. 1992 Predictors of functional outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy J Rheumatol 19 12 1938 1942 1294743 1:STN:280:DyaK3s7psFyrsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 23018528)
17. H Higuchi M Kimura K Shirakura M Terauchi K Takagishi 2000 Factors affecting long-term results after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy Clin Orthop Relat Res 377 161 168 10943198 10.1097/00003086-200008000-00022 (Pubitemid 30614881)
18. P Fauno AB Nielsen 1992 Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: a long-term follow-up Arthroscopy 8 3 345 349 1418207 10.1016/0749-8063(92)90066-K 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FjvFWnsg%3D%3D
19. CD Harner CS Mauro BP Lesniak JR Romanowski 2009 Biomechanical consequences of a tear of the posterior root of the medial meniscus. Surgical technique J Bone Joint Surg Am 91 Suppl 2 257 270 19805589 10.2106/JBJS.I.00500
20. AA De Smet MJ Tuite 2006 Use of the "two-slice-touch" rule for the MRI diagnosis of meniscal tears AJR Am J Roentgenol 187 4 911 914 16985134 10.2214/AJR.05.1354 (Pubitemid 44453941)
21. JR Landis GG Koch 1977 The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data Biometrics 33 1 159 174 843571 10.2307/2529310 1:STN:280:DyaE2s7jsFWqtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 8054849)
22. GB Blackmon NM Major CA Helms 2005 Comparison of fast spin-echo versus conventional spin-echo MRI for evaluating meniscal tears AJR Am J Roentgenol 184 6 1740 1743 15908523 (Pubitemid 40770141)
23. DA Rubin JB Kneeland J Listerud SJ Underberg-Davis MK Dalinka 1994 MR diagnosis of meniscal tears of the knee: value of fast spin-echo vs conventional spin-echo pulse sequences AJR Am J Roentgenol 162 5 1131 1135 8165997 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3hvFeitg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 24144985)
24. KJ Stevens RF Busse E Han, et al. 2008 Ankle: isotropic MR imaging with 3D-FSE-cube-initial experience in healthy volunteers Radiology 249 3 1026 1033 19011194 10.1148/radiol.2493080227
25. JM Brody MJ Hulstyn BC Fleming GA Tung 2007 The meniscal roots: gross anatomic correlation with 3-T MRI findings AJR Am J Roentgenol 188 5 W446 450 17449741 10.2214/AJR.06.0509
26. JM Brody HM Lin MJ Hulstyn GA Tung 2006 Lateral meniscus root tear and meniscus extrusion with anterior cruciate ligament tear Radiology 239 3 805 810 16714462 10.1148/radiol.2393050559 (Pubitemid 43830616)
27. AA De Smet DG Blankenbaker R Kijowski BK Graf K Shinki 2009 MR diagnosis of posterior root tears of the lateral meniscus using arthroscopy as the reference standard AJR Am J Roentgenol 192 2 480 486 19155414 10.2214/AJR.08.1300
28. A Mohr FW Roemer HK Genant C Liess 2003 Using fat-saturated proton density-weighted MR imaging to evaluate articular cartilage AJR Am J Roentgenol 181 1 280 281 12818878 Author reply 1-2
29. FK Schaefer PJ Schaefer J Brossmann, et al. 2006 Value of fat-suppressed PD-weighted TSE-sequences for detection of anterior and posterior cruciate ligament lesions-comparison to arthroscopy Eur J Radiol 58 3 411 415 16466674 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.12.034 (Pubitemid 44250886)
30. A Mohr 2003 The value of water-excitation 3D FLASH and fat-saturated PDw TSE MR imaging for detecting and grading articular cartilage lesions of the knee Skeletal Radiol 32 7 396 402 12719928 10.1007/s00256-003-0635-z (Pubitemid 36926625)
31. NR Lal DA Jamadar K Doi, et al. 2000 Evaluation of bone contusions with fat-saturated fast spin-echo proton-density magnetic resonance imaging Can Assoc Radiol J 51 3 182 185 10914084 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czpt1Kltw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30643947)
32. SF Quinn TF Brown 1991 Meniscal tears diagnosed with MR imaging versus arthroscopy: how reliable a standard is arthroscopy? Radiology 181 3 843 847 1947108 1:STN:280:DyaK38%2FltlWjtQ%3D%3D
33. KD Shelbourne J Heinrich 2004 The long-term evaluation of lateral meniscus tears left in situ at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Arthroscopy 20 4 346 351 15067272 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.01.029 (Pubitemid 38544418)
34. A Pierre C Hulet B Locker D Schiltz JC Delbarre C Vielpeau 2001 Outcome of 95 stable meniscal tears left in place after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87 7 661 668 11845069 1:STN:280:DC%2BD387htVCjug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 33111278)