Renal perfusion evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 674-681

  Schneider, Antoine G ^a   Hofmann, Lucie ^a   Wuerzner, Grégoire ^a   Glatz, Nicolas ^a   Maillard, Marc ^a   Meuwly, Jean Yves ^a   Eggimann, Philippe ^a   Burnier, Michel ^a   Vogt, Bruno ^a  

^a LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

angiotensin II; contrast enhanced ultrasound; effective renal plasma flow; microcirculation; renal haemodynamic

Indexed keywords

4 AMINOHIPPURIC ACID; ANGIOTENSIN II; CAPTOPRIL; SONOVUE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTINUOUS INFUSION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DOSE RESPONSE; ECHOGRAPHY; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KIDNEY CLEARANCE; KIDNEY PERFUSION; KIDNEY PLASMA FLOW; MALE; MICROCIRCULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; URINE VOLUME;

ADULT; ANGIOTENSIN II; CAPTOPRIL; COHORT STUDIES; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; KIDNEY CORTEX; MALE; MICROCIRCULATION; OBSERVER VARIATION; REFERENCE VALUES; RENAL CIRCULATION; RENAL PLASMA FLOW, EFFECTIVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84856927619     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfr345     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Prowle JR, Ishikawa K, May CN et al. Renal blood flow during acute renal failure in man. Blood Purif 2009; 28: 216-225
2. Selkurt EE. Renal blood flow and renal clearance in hemorraghic shock. Am J Physiol 1946; 145: 699-799
3. Wan L, Yang N, Hiew CY et al. An assessment of the accuracy of renal blood flow estimation by Doppler ultrasound. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 1503-1510
4. Chierego M, Verdant C, De Backer D. Microcirculatory alterations in critically ill patients. Minerva Anestesiol 2006; 72: 199-205
5. Buchele GL, Ospina-Tascon GA, De Backer D. How microcirculation data have changed my clinical practice. Curr Opin Crit Care 2007; 13: 324-331
6. De Backer D, Dubois MJ. Assessment of the microcirculatory flow in patients in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Crit Care 2001; 7: 200-203
7. Schneider A, Johnson L, Goodwin M et al. Bench-to-bedside review: Contrast enhanced ultrasonography-a promising technique to assess renal perfusion in the ICU. Critical Care 2011; 15: 157.
8. Wei K, Jayaweera AR, Firoozan S et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. Circulation 1998; 97: 473-483
9. Vogel R, Indermuhle A, Reinhardt J et al. The quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion in humans by contrast echocardiography: algorithm and validation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 754-762
10. Wei K, Le E, Bin JP et al. Quantification of renal blood flow with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1135-1140
11. Kishimoto N, Mori Y, Nishiue T et al. Renal blood flow measurement with contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasonography: evaluation of dopamine-induced changes in renal cortical perfusion in humans. Clin Nephrol 2003; 59: 423-428
12. Schlosser T, Pohl C, Veltmann C et al. Feasibility of the flashreplenishment concept in renal tissue: which parameters affect the assessment of the contrast replenishment? Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27: 937-944
13. Hosotani Y, TakahashiN,KiyomotoHet al.Anew method for evaluation of split renal cortical blood flow with contrast echography. Hypertens Res 2002; 25: 77-83
14. Hall JE. Guyton & Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders, 2011 Chapter 19: p. 221
15. Jarrott B, Drummer O, Hooper R et al. Pharmacokinetic properties of captopril after acute and chronic administration to hypertensive subjects. Am J Cardiol 1982; 49: 1547-1549
16. Arditi M, Frinking PJ, Zhou X et al. A new formalism for the quantification of tissue perfusion by the destruction-replenishment method in contrast ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2006; 53: 1118-1129
17. Guyton A, Hall JE. Textbook of Medical Physiology. Saunders, 2006; Chapter 26
18. Coltamai L, Maillard M, Simon A et al. Comparative vascular and renal tubular effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers combined with a thiazide diuretic in humans. J Hypertens 2010; 28: 520-526
19. Groner W, Winkelman JW, Harris AG et al. Orthogonal polarization spectral imaging: a new method for study of the microcirculation. Nat Med 1999; 5: 1209-1212
20. DeBacker D, Creteur J,Preiser JC et al.Microvascular blood flowis altered in patients with sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166: 98-104
21. De Backer D, Dubois MJ, Schmartz D et al. Microcirculatory alterations in cardiac surgery: effects of cardiopulmonary bypass and anesthesia. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88: 1396-1403
22. De Backer D, Creteur J, Dubois MJ et al. Microvascular alterations in patients with acute severe heart failure and cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J 2004; 147: 91-99
23. Kalantarinia K, Belcik JT, Patrie JT et al. Real-time measurement of renal blood flow in healthy subjects using contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2009; 297: F1129-F1134
24. Rim SJ, Leong-Poi H, Lindner JR et al. Quantification of cerebral perfusion with "Real-Time" contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Circulation 2001; 104: 2582-2587
25. Wei K, Mulvagh SL, Carson L et al. The safety of deFinity and Optison for ultrasound image enhancement: a retrospective analysis of 78,383 administered contrast doses. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008; 21: 1202-1206
26. Main ML, Ryan AC, Davis TE et al. Acute mortality in hospitalized patients undergoing echocardiography with and without an ultrasound contrast agent (multicenter registry results in 4,300,966 consecutive patients). Am J Cardiol 2008; 102: 1742-1746
27. Kusnetzky LL, Khalid A, Khumri TM et al. Acute mortality in hospitalized patients undergoing echocardiography with and without an ultrasound contrast agent: results in 18,671 consecutive studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 1704-1706
28. DolanMS, Gala SS, Dodla S et al. Safety and efficacy of commercially available ultrasound contrast agents for rest and stress echocardiography a multicenter experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 32-38