Factors influencing the fulfillment of women's preferences for birthing positions during second stage of labor

Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 25-31

  Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne ^a   Jonge, Ank De ^b   Korstjens, Irene ^a   Lagro Jansse, Toine ^c  

^a ZUYD UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Birthing positions; Choice behavior; Decision making; Home birth; Midwifery; Patient preference; Women centered care

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTHING POSITION; DECISION MAKING; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABOR STAGE 2; MIDWIFE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SITTING; SUPINE POSITION; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABOR STAGE, SECOND; MIDWIFERY; PARTURITION; PATIENT POSITIONING; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; QUESTIONNAIRES; WOMEN;

EID: 84856871935     PISSN: 0167482X     EISSN: 17438942     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0167482X.2011.642428     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. O'Cathain A, Thomas K, Walters SJ, Nicholl J, Kirkham M. Women's perceptions of informed choice in maternity care. Midwifery 2002;18:136-144.
2. Gamble J, Creedy DK, Teakle B. Women's expectations of maternity services: a community-based survey. Women Birth 2007;20: 115-120. (Pubitemid 47302953)
3. Seefat-van Teeffelen A, Nieuwenhuijze M, Korstjens I. Women want proactive psychosocial support from midwives during transition to motherhood: a qualitative study. Midwifery 2011;27:e122-e127.
4. Hendrix M, Van Horck M, Moreta D, Nieman F, Nieuwenhuijze M, Severens J, Nijhuis J. Why women do not accept randomization for place of birth: feasibility of a RCT in The Netherlands. BJOG 2009;116:537-42; discussion 542.
5. Hodnett ED. Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S160-S172. (Pubitemid 34634267)
6. Waldenstrom U, Hildingsson I, Rubertsson C, Radestad I. A negative birth experience: prevalence and risk factors in a national sample. Birth 2004;31:17-27. (Pubitemid 38393439)
7. Green JM, Baston HA. Feeling in control during labor: concepts, correlates, and consequences. Birth 2003;30:235-247. (Pubitemid 37485550)
8. ICM. The philosophy and model of midwifery care 2005. Available at http://www.internationalmidwives.org/Portals/5/2010/ Philosophy%20and%20model%20of%20midwifery%20care%20final%20oft2005. pdf Accessed June 25, 2011.
9. Gupta JK, Hofmeyr GJ, Smyth RMD. Position in the second of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD002006. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002006.pub2
10. de Jonge A, Teunissen TA, Lagro-Janssen AL. Supine position compared to other positions during the second stage of labor: a metaanalytic review. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2004;25:35-45. (Pubitemid 38997589)
11. de Jonge A, van Diem MT, Scheepers PL, van der Pal-de Bruin KM, Lagro-Janssen AL. Increased blood loss in upright birthing positions originates from perineal damage. BJOG 2007;114:349-355.
12. De Jonge A, Lagro-Janssen AL. Birthing positions. A qualitative study into the views of women about various birthing positions. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2004;25:47-55. (Pubitemid 38997590)
13. Green JM, Coupland VA, Kitzinger JV. Expectations, experiences, and psychological outcomes of childbirth: a prospective study of 825 women. Birth 1990;17:15-24.
14. van Diem MTh. De invloed van kenmerken van de vrouw en de vroedvrouw op de baringshouding. [The influence of women's and midwives' characteristics on the birthing position]. Tijdschrift voor Verloskundigen 1997;22:18-27.
15. Foureur M, Davis D, Fenwick J, Leap N, Iedema R, Forbes I, Homer CS. The relationship between birth unit design and safe, satisfying birth: developing a hypothetical model. Midwifery 2010;26:520-525.
16. Hanson L. Second-stage positioning in nurse-midwifery practices. Part 2: Factors affecting use. J Nurse Midwifery 1998;43:326-330. (Pubitemid 128724935)
17. Roberts JE. The "push" for evidence: management of the second stage. J Midwifery Womens Health 2002;47:2-15.
18. Walsh D. Part five: why we should reject the "bed birth" myth. Br J Midwifery 2000;8:554-558.
19. Dunn PM. Francois Mauriceau (1637-1709) and maternal posture for parturition. Arch Dis Child 1991;66:78-79.
20. Rossi MA, Lindell SG. Maternal positions and pushing techniques in a nonprescriptive environment. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1986;15:203-208.
21. Russell JG. The rationale of primitive delivery positions. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982;89:712-715. (Pubitemid 12061490)
22. Hunt LM, Glantz NM, Halperin DC. Childbirth care-seeking behavior in Chiapas. Health Care Women Int 2002;23:98-118.
23. Lugina H, Mlay R, Smith H. Mobility and maternal position during childbirth in Tanzania: an exploratory study at four government hospitals. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2004;4:3.
24. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2009.
25. The Netherlands Perinatal Registry (PRN-foundation). Bilthoven, 2007.
26. van Teijlingen ER, Hundley V, Rennie AM, Graham W, Fitzmaurice A. Maternity satisfaction studies and their limitations: "What is, must still be best". Birth 2003;30:75-82. (Pubitemid 36623448)
27. Thachuk A. Midwifery, informed choice, and reproductive autonomy: a relational approach. Fem Psychol 2007;17:39-56.
28. Cooke P. Helping women to make their own decisions. In: Raynor MD, Marshall JE, Sullivan A, editors. Decision making in midwifery practice. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2005. pp 127-141.
29. Edwards NP. Why can't women just say no? And does it really matter? In: Kirkham M, editor. Informed choice in maternity care. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004. pp 1-29.
30. Kitzinger S. Birth plans. In: The politics of birth. Edinburgh: Elsevier Health; 2005. pp 89-97.
31. de Jonge A, Teunissen DA, van Diem MT, Scheepers PL, Lagro- Janssen AL. Women's positions during the second stage of labour: views of primary care midwives. J Adv Nurs 2008;63:347-356.
32. Green JM, Kitzinger JV, Coupland VA. Stereotypes of childbearing women: a look at some evidence. Midwifery 1990;6:125-132. (Pubitemid 20328175)
33. Stapleton H. Is there a difference between a free gift and a planned purchase? The use of evidence-based leaflets in maternity care. In: Kirkham M, editor. Informed choice in maternity care. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004. pp 87-115.
34. Borquez HA, Wiegers TA. A comparison of labour and birth experiences of women delivering in a birthing centre and at home in the Netherlands. Midwifery 2006;22:339-347. (Pubitemid 44667135)
35. Johnson TR, Callister LC, Freeborn DS, Beckstrand RL, Huender K. Dutch women's perceptions of childbirth in the Netherlands. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2007;32:170-177.
36. Dahlen HG, Barclay LM, Homer CS. The novice birthing: theorizing first-time mothers' experiences of birth at home and in hospital in Australia. Midwifery 2010;26:53-63.
37. Wax JR, Lucas FL, Lamont M, Pinette MG, Cartin A, Blackstone J. Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs planned hospital births: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:243. e1-243.e8.
38. Evers AC, Brouwers HA, Hukkelhoven CW, Nikkels PG, Boon J, van Egmond-Linden A, Hillegersberg J, et al. Perinatal mortality and severe morbidity in low and high risk term pregnancies in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2010;341:c5639.
39. Janssen PA, Henderson AD, Vedam S. The experience of planned home birth: views of the first 500 women. Birth 2009;36:297-304.
40. Hutton EK, Reitsma AH, Kaufman K. Outcomes associated with planned home and planned hospital births in low-risk women attended by midwives in Ontario, Canada, 2003-2006: a retrospective cohort study. Birth 2009;36:180-189.
41. Maassen MS, Hendrix MJ, Van Vugt HC, Veersema S, Smits F, Nijhuis JG. Operative deliveries in low-risk pregnancies in The Netherlands: primary versus secondary care. Birth 2008;35:277-282.
42. de Jonge A, van der Goes BY, Ravelli AC, Amelink-Verburg MP, Mol BW, Nijhuis JG, Bennebroek Gravenhorst J, Buitendijk SE. Perinatal mortality and morbidity in a nationwide cohort of 529,688 low-risk planned home and hospital births. BJOG 2009;116:1177-1184.
43. Mol BWJ, de Jonge A, Nijhuis JG, Buitendijk SE. Thuisbevalling niet verantwoordelijk. [Home birth not responsible]. Medisch Contact 2010;65:2390-2393.
44. Michal CA, Janssen PA, Vedam S, Hutton EK, de Jonge A. Planned home vs hospital birth: a meta-analysis gone wrong. Medscape Ob/ Gyn & Women's Health. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/739987. Accessed April 01, 2011.
45. Rijnders M, Baston H, Schönbeck Y, van der Pal K, Prins M, Green J, Buitendijk S. Perinatal factors related to negative or positive recall of birth experience in women 3 years postpartum in the Netherlands. Birth 2008;35:107-116. (Pubitemid 351748713)
46. Christiaens W, Bracke P. Place of birth and satisfaction with childbirth in Belgium and the Netherlands. Midwifery 2009; 25:e11-e19.
47. Carlson JM, Diehl JA, Sachtleben-Murray M, McRae M, Fenwick L, Friedman EA. Maternal position during parturition in normal labor. Obstet Gynecol 1986;68:443-447.
48. van der Hulst LA, van Teijlingen ER, Bonsel GJ, Eskes M, Bleker OP. Does a pregnant woman's intended place of birth influence her attitudes toward and occurrence of obstetric interventions? Birth 2004;31:28-33. (Pubitemid 38393440)
49. Kelly FW, Terry R, Naglieri R. A review of alternative birthing positions. J Am Osteopath Assoc 1999;99:470-474. (Pubitemid 29474664)
50. Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1957.