Adaptive and integrative governance on risk and uncertainty

Journal of Risk Research

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 273-292

  Klinke, Andreas ^a   Renn, Ortwin ^b  

^a MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

adaptive capacity; ambiguity; communication; complexity; deliberation; integrative risk governance; stakeholder involvement; uncertainty

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE CAPACITY; AMBIGUITY; COMPLEXITY; DELIBERATION; INTEGRATIVE RISK GOVERNANCE; STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT; UNCERTAINTY;

COMMUNICATION; DECISION TREES; RISK MANAGEMENT;

RISK PERCEPTION;

EID: 84856859425     PISSN: 13669877     EISSN: 14664461     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2011.636838     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (60)

1. Abels, G. 2007. Citizen involvement in public policymaking: Does it improve democratic legitimacy and accountability? The case of pTA. Interdisciplinary Information Science 13, no. 1: 103-16.
2. Armitage, D., F. Berkes, and N. Doubleday. 2007. Adaptive co-management. Collaboration, learning and multilevel governance. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
3. Aven, T., and O. Renn. 2009. The role of quantitative risk assessments for characterizing risk and uncertainty and delineating appropriate risk management options, with special emphasis on terrorism. Risk Analysis 29, no. 4: 587-600.
4. Aven, T., and J.E. Vinnem. 2007. Risk management: With applications from the offshore petroleum industry. Heidelberg: Springer.
5. Beierle, T.C., and J. Cayford. 2002. Democracy in practice. Public participation in environmental decisions. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
6. Berkhout, F., J. Hertin, and D.M. Gann. 2006. Learning to adapt: Organisational adaptation to climate change impacts. Climate Change 78: 135-56.
7. Brooks, M., and W.N. Adger. 2005. Assessing and enhancing adaptive capacity. In Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change: Developing strategies, policies and measures, ed. K. Chopra, R. Leemans, P. Kumar, and H. Simons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Charnley, G. 2000. Democratic science: Enhancing the role of science in stakeholder-based risk management decision-making. Report of health risk strategies. Washington, DC: Health Risk Strategies.
9. Daft, R.L., and K.E. Weick. 1984. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review 9, no. 2: 284-95.
10. Feldman, M.S. 1989. Order without design: Information production and policy making. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11. Filar, J.A., and A. Haurie, eds. 2010. Uncertainty and environmental decision making. New York, NY: Springer.
12. Folke, C., T. Hahn, P. Olsson, and J. Norberg. 2005. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30, no. 1: 441-73.
13. Functowicz, S.O., and J.R. Ravetz. 1992. Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science. In Social theories of risk, ed. S. Krimsky and D. Golding, 251-73. Westport, CA: Praeger.
14. German Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU). 2000. World in transition: Strategies for managing global environmental risks. Heidelberg: Springer.
15. Goldstein, J., and R.O. Keohane. 1993. Ideas and foreign policy. An analytical framework. In Ideas and foreign policy. Beliefs, institutions, and political change, ed. J. Goldstein and R.O. Keohane, 3-30. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
16. Hagendijk, R., and A. Irwin. 2006. Public deliberation and governance. Engaging with science and technology in contemporary Europe. Minerva 44: 167-84.
17. Halpern, J.Y. 2003. Reasoning about uncertainty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Hammond, J., R. Keeney, and H. Raiffa. 1999. Smart choices: A practical guide to making better decisions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
19. Health and Safety Executive (HSE). 2001. Reducing risk - protecting people. London: Health and Safety Executive.
20. HM Treasury. 2005. Managing risks to the public: Appraisal guidance. London. www.hmtreasury. gov.uk/media/0/B/Managing risks to the public.pdf (accessed September 2008).
21. Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2003. Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review 97, no. 2: 233-43.
22. Horlick-Jones, T., and J. Sime. 2004. Living on the border: Knowledge, risk and transdisciplinarity. Futures 36: 441-56.
23. Hudson, K.L. 2006. Preimplantation diagnosis: Public policy and public attitudes. Fertility & Sterility 58, no. 6: 1638-45.
24. International Risk Governance Council (IRGC). 2005. Risk governance: Towards an integrative approach. White Paper no 1, Author O. Renn with an Annex by P. Graham. Geneva: IRGC.
25. Jasanoff, S. 2004. Ordering knowledge, ordering society. In States of knowledge: The coproduction of science and social order, ed. S. Jasanoff, 13-45. London: Routledge.
26. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky, eds. 2000. Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Keeney, R., and T. McDaniels. 2001. A framework to guide thinking and analysis regarding climate change policies. Risk Analysis 21, no. 6: 989-1000.
28. Klinke, A. 2006. Demokratisches Regieren jenseits des Staates. Deliberative Politik im nordamerikanischen Große Seen-Regime [Democratic governance beyond the nation-state. Deliberative politics in the North American great lakes-regime]. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.
29. Klinke, A., and O. Renn. 2001. Precautionary principle and discursive strategies: Classifying and managing risks. Journal of Risk Research 4, no. 2: 159-73.
30. Klinke, A., and O. Renn. 2002. A new approach to risk evaluation and management: Riskbased, precaution-based, and discourse-based strategies. Risk Analysis 22, no. 6: 1071-94.
31. Klinke, A., and O. Renn. 2010. Risk governance: Contemporary and future challenges. In Regulating chemical risks: European and global challenges, ed. J. Eriksson, M. Gilek, and C. Ruden, 9-27. Berlin: Springer.
32. Klinke, A., M. Dreyer, O. Renn, A. Stirling, and P. van Zwanenberg. 2006. Precautionary risk regulation in European Governance. Journal of Risk Research 9, no. 4: 373-92.
33. Laudan, L. 1996. The pseudo-science of science? The demise of the demarcation problem. In Beyond positivism and relativism. Theory, method and evidence, ed. L. Laudan, 166-92. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
34. Lewin, R. 1992. Complexity: Life at the edge of chaos. New York, NY: Macmillan.
35. Löfstedt, R.E. 1997. Risk evaluation in the United Kingdom: Legal requirements, conceptual foundations, and practical experiences with special emphasis on energy systems. Working Paper 92, Center of Technology Assessment, Stuttgart.
36. Löfstedt, R., and D. Vogel. 2001. The changing character of regulation: A comparison of Europe and the United States. Risk Analysis 21, no. 3: 393-402.
37. Luhmann, N. 1993. Risk: A sociological theory. Berlin: de Gruyter.
38. Marti, K., Y. Ermoliev, and M. Makowski, eds. 2010. Coping with uncertainty. Robust solutions. Berlin: Springer.
39. Nelson, T.E., Z.M. Oxleay, and R.A. Clawson. 1997. Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior 19, no. 3: 221-46.
40. OECD. 2003. Emerging systemic risks. Final report to the OECD futures project. Paris: OECD.
41. Pelling, M., and C. High. 2004. Understanding adaptation: What can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? Global Environmental Change 15: 308-19.
42. Pelling, M., C. High, J. Dearing, and D. Smith. 2008. Shadow spaces for social learning: A relational understanding of adaptive capacity to climate change within organisations. Environment and Planning A 40: 867-84.
43. Reese, S.D., O.H. Gandy, Jr., and A.E. Grant, eds. 2003. Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44. Renn, O. 2008. Risk governance. Coping with uncertainty in a complex world. London: Earthscan.
45. Renn, O., and K. Walker. 2008a. Lessons learned: A re-assessment of the IRGC framework on risk governance. In The IRGC risk governance framework: Concepts and practice, ed. O. Renn and K. Walker, 331-67. Heidelberg and New York: Springer.
46. Renn O., K. Walker, eds. 2008b. The IRGC risk governance framework: Concepts and practice. Heidelberg: Springer.
47. Renn, O., P.-J. Schweizer, M. Dreyer, and A. Klinke. 2007. Risiko: Über den gesellschaftlichen Umgang mit Unsicherheit [Risk: On the societal handling of insecurity]. Munich: Ökom.
48. Renn, O., T. Webler, and P.M. Wiedemann, eds. 1995. Fairness and competence in citizen participation. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
49. Rosa, E. 1997. Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk. Journal of Risk Research 1, no. 1: 15-44.
50. Rowe, G., and L.J. Frewer. 2000. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values 25, no. 1: 3-29.
51. Skelcher, C. 2005. Jurisdictional integrity, polycentrism, and the design of democratic governance. Governance 18, no. 1: 89-110.
52. Staber, U., and J. Sydow. 2002. Organizational adaptive capacity: A structuration perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry 11: 408-24.
53. Stirling, A. 2003. Risk, uncertainty and precaution: Some instrumental implications from the social sciences. In Negotiating change, ed. F. Berkhout, M. Leach, and I. Scoones, 331-67. London: Edward Elgar.
54. Stoll-Kleemann, S., and M. Welp, eds. 2006. Stakeholder dialogues in natural resources management: Theory and practice. Heidelberg: Springer.
55. Underdal, A. 2009. Complexity and challenges of long-term environmental governance. Global Environmental Change 20: 386-93.
56. Van Asselt, M.B.A. 2000. Perspectives on uncertainty and risk. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
57. Waldrop, M.M. 1992. Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. London: Penguin Books.
58. Webster, D.G. 2009. Adaptive governance. The dynamics of Atlantic fisheries management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59. Wilkinson, C.F., and J.C. Lamb. 1999. The potential health effects of phthalate esters in children's toys. A review and risk assessment. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 30, no. 2: 140-55.
60. Zahariadis, N. 2003. Ambiguity and choice in public policy. Political decision making in modern democracies. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.