Mental visualization of objects from cross-sectional images

Cognition

Volumn 123, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 33-49

  Wu, Bing ^a   Klatzky, Roberta L ^b   Stetten, George D ^c,d  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Carnegie Mellon University ^*  (United States)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Anorthoscopic; Cross section; Integration; Spatiotemporal; Visualization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS SECTIONAL IMAGE VISUALIZATION; ERROR; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE DISPLAY; MALE; MENTAL VISUALIZATION; NORMAL HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL STIMULATION;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; TRANSDUCERS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84856789437     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 1987, 94(2):115-147.
2. Bingham G.P., Lind M. Large continuous perspective transformations are necessary and sufficient for perception of metric shape. Perception and Psychophysics 2008, 70(3):524-540.
3. Bülthoff H.H., Edelman S., Tarr M.J. How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain?. Cerebral Cortex 1995, 5:247-260.
4. Day R.H. Apparent depth from progressive exposure of moving shadows: The kinetic depth effect in a narrow aperture. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1989, 27(4):320-322.
5. Fendrich R., Rieger J.W., Heinze H-J. The effect of retinal stabilization on anorthoscopic percepts under free-viewing conditions. Vision Research 2005, 45:567-582.
6. Fujita N. Three-dimensional anorthoscopic perception. Perception 1990, 19(6):767-771.
7. Girgus J.S., Gellman L.H., Hochberg J. The effect of spatial order on piecemeal shape recognition: A developmental study. Perception and Psychophysics 1980, 28:133-138.
8. Harman K.L., Humphrey G.K., Goodale M.A. Active manual control of object views facilitates visual recognition. Current Biology 1999, 9:1315-1318.
9. Hegarty M., Keehner M., Cohen C., Montello D.R., Lippa Y. The role of spatial cognition in medicine: Applications for selecting and training professionals. Applied spatial cognition 2007, 285-315. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. G. Allen (Ed.).
10. Helmholtz H.V. Handbuch der physiologischen Optik 1867, Voss, Hamburg.
11. Hochberg J. In the mind's eye. Contemporary theory and research in visual perception 1968, 309-331. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York. R.N. Haber (Ed.).
12. Irwin D.E. Information integration across saccadic eye movements. Cognitive Psychology 1991, 23:420-456.
13. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics 1973, 14:201-211.
14. Kellman P.J., Shipley T.F. A theory of visual interpolation in object perception. Cognitive Psychology 1991, 23:141-221.
15. Klatzky R.L., Wu B., Shelton D., Stetten G. Effectiveness of augmented-reality visualization vs. cognitive mediation for learning actions in near space. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 2008, 5(1):1-23. (article 1).
16. Kosslyn S. Image and mind 1980, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Lanca M. Three-dimensional representations of contour maps. Contemporary Educational Psychology 1998, 23(11):22-41.
18. Lawson R. Achieving visual object constancy over plane rotation and depth rotation. Acta Psychologica 1999, 102:221-245.
19. Lawson R., Humphreys G.W., Watson D.G. Object recognition under sequential viewing conditions: Evidence for viewpoint-specific recognition procedures. Perception 1994, 23:595-614.
20. LeClair E.E. Alphatome - Enhancing spatial reasoning. Journal of College Science Teaching 2003, 33(1):26-31.
21. Loomis J.M., Klatzky R.L., Lederman S.J. Similarity of tactual and visual picture perception with limited field of view. Perception 1991, 20:167-177.
22. Marr D. Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information 1982, W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.
23. McGee M. Human spatial abilities: Sources of sex differences 1979, Praeger Publishers, New York.
24. Melcher D., Morrone M.C. Spatiotopic temporal integration of visual motion across saccadic eye movements. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:877-881.
25. National Research Council Learning to think spatially 2006, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
26. Ögmen H. A theory of moving form perception: Synergy between masking, perceptual grouping, and motion computation in retinotopic and non-retinotopic representations. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 2007, 3:67-84.
27. Oldfield S.R., Phillips J.R. The spatial characteristics of tactile form perception. Perception 1983, 12:615-626.
28. Palmer S.E. Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation. Cognitive Psychology 1977, 2:441-474.
29. Palmer E.M., Kellman P.J., Shipley T.F. A theory of dynamic occluded and illusory object perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006, 135:513-541.
30. Palmer S.E., Rock I. Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1994, 1:9-55.
31. Parks T. Post-retinal visual storage. American Journal of Psychology 1965, 78:145-147.
32. Parsons L.M. Imagined spatial transformation of one's body. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1987, 116(2):172-191.
33. Parsons L.M., Shimojo S. Perceived spatial organization of cutaneous patterns on surfaces of the human body in various positions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1987, 13(3):488-504.
34. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological Bulletin 1978, 85:618-660.
35. Riesenhuber M., Poggio T. Models of object recognition. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3(Suppl.):1199-1205.
36. Rock I. Anorthoscopic perception. Scientific American 1981, 244(3):145-153.
37. Shimojo S., Sasaki M., Parsons L.M., Torii S. Mirror reversal by blind subjects in cutaneous perception and motor production of letters and numbers. Perception and Psychophysics 1989, 45:145-152.
38. Shukla, G., Wang, B., Galeotti, J., Wu, B., Klatzky, R., Shelton, D., & et al. (2009). In situ visualization of 3D data using a movable tracked touch-screen. In Biomedical Engineering Society (BMES) annual conference, Pittsburgh, PA, October 2009.
39. Stetten, G. (2003). System and method for location-merging of real-time tomographic slice images with human vision. U.S. patent no. 6599247 (issue date: July 29, 2003).
40. Stetten G., Chib V. Overlaying ultrasound images on direct vision. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 2001, 20(3):235-240.
41. Stone J.V. Object recognition using spatiotemporal signatures. Vision Research 1998, 38(7):947-951.
42. Stone J.V. Object recognition: View-specificity and motion-specificity. Vision Research 1999, 39(24):4032-4044.
43. Tarr, M. J., & Vuong, Q. C. (2002). Visual object recognition. In H. Pashler (Series Ed.), & S. Yantis (Ed.), Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology: Sensation and perception (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 287-314). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
44. Tarr M.J., Bülthoff H.H. Image-based object recognition in man, monkey, and machine. Cognition 1998, 67:1-20.
45. Wallis G., Bülthoff H. Effects of temporal association on recognition memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2001, 98(8):4800-4804.
46. Wang D., Amesur N., Shukla G., Bayless A., Weiser D., Scharl A., et al. Peripherally inserted central catheter placement with the Sonic Flashlight: Initial clinical trial by nurses. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 2009, 28(5):651-656.
47. Willems B., Wagemans J. Matching multicomponent objects from different viewpoints: Mental rotation or normalization?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27(5):1090-1115.
48. Wu B., Klatzky R.L., Shelton D., Stetten G. Psychophysical evaluation of in-situ ultrasound visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 2005, 11(6):684-693.
49. Wu B., Klatzky R.L., Stetten G. Learning to reach to locations encoded from imaging displays. Spatial Cognition and Computation 2008, 88:333-356.
50. Wu B., Klatzky R.L., Stetten G. Visualizing 3D objects from 2D cross sectional images displayed in-situ versus ex-situ. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2010, 16(1):45-59.
51. Zöllner F. über eine neue art anorthoskopischer zerrbilder. Annalen der Physik und Chemie 1862, 117:477-484.