Introduction to environmental risk assessment for transgenic fish

Environmental Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Organisms

Volumn 3, Issue , 2007, Pages 1-28

  Hayes, K R ^a   Kapuscinski, A R ^b   Dana, G ^b   Li, S ^c   Devlin, R H ^d  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c SHANGHAI OCEAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856788676     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (87)

1. ABRAC (Agricultural Biotechnology Research Advisory Committee) (1995) Performance Standards for Safely Conducting Research with Genetically Modified Fish and Shellfish. Parts I and II. Document Nos. 95-04 and 95-05. United States Department of Agriculture, Office of Agricultural Biotechnology, Washington, DC. Available at: www.isb.vt.edu/perfstands/psmain.cfm
2. Asian Development Bank (1990) Dealing with Uncertainty in Environmental Impact Assessment. ADB Environment Paper No.7, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
3. Asian Development Bank (2005) An Impact Evaluation of the Development of Genetically Improved Farmed Tilapia, and Their Dissemination in Selected Countries. Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong City, Philippines. Available at: www.adb.org/Publications
4. AS/NZS 4360 (2004) Risk Management. Standards Australia International Ltd, Sydney, Australia and Standards New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
5. Bartell, S.M. and Nair, S.K. (2003) Establishment risks for invasive species. Risk Analysis 24, 833-845.
6. Bartell, S.M., Pastorok, R.A., Akcakaya, H.R., Regan, H., Ferson, S. and Mackay, C. (2003) Realism and relevance of ecological models used in chemical risk assessment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 9, 907-938.
7. Bomford, M. and Glover, J. (2004) Risk Assessment Model for the Import and Keeping of Exotic Freshwater and Estuarine Finfish. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra, Australia. Available at: http://www.feral.org.au/feral_documents/finfish_risk_assessment.pdf
8. Burgman, M.A. (2001) Flaws in subjective assessments of ecological risks and means for correcting them. Australian Journal of Environmental Management 8, 219-226.
9. Burgman, M.A. (2005) Risks and Decisions for Conservation and Environmental Management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10. CABI (2005) UK Non-native Organism Risk Assessment Scheme User Manual. CABI Bioscience (CABI), Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS), Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH), Central Science Laboratory (CSL), Imperial College London (IC) and the University of Greenwich (UoG). Available at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/wildlifecountryside/resprog/findings/non-native-risks/pdf/user-manual.pdf
11. Caley, P., Lonsdale, W.M. and Pheloung, P.C. (2006) Quantifying uncertainty in predictions of invasiveness. Biological Invasions 8, 277-286.
12. CBD (2000) Cartagena Protocol in Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity: Text and Annexes. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal. Available at: http://www.biodivorg/doc/legal/cartagena-protocol-en.pdf
13. Copp, G.H., Garthwaite, R. and Gozlan, R.E. (2005) Risk identification and assessment on nonnative freshwater fishes: concepts and perspectives on protocols for the UK. Science Series Technical Report 129, Center for Fisheries and Aquaculture (Cefas), Lowestoft, UK.
14. Cortemeglia, C. and Beitinger, T.L. (2006) Projected US distributions of transgenic and wildtype zebra danios, Danio rerio, based on temperature tolerance data. Journal of Thermal Biology 31, 422-428.
15. Cox, P., Niewohner, J., Pidgeon, N., Gerrard, S., Fischhoff, B. and Riley, D. (2003) The use of mental models in chemical risk protection: developing a generic workplace methodology. Risk Analysis 23, 311-324.
16. Crawford-Brown, D.J. (2001) Mathematical Methods of Environmental Risk Modelling. Kluwer Academic, Boston, Massachusetts.
17. Dambacher, J.M., Hiram, W.L. and Rossignol, P.A. (2003a) Qualitative predictions in model ecosystems. Ecological Modelling 161, 79-93.
18. Dambacher, J.M., Luh, H.K., Li, H.W., and Rossignol, P.A. (2003b) Qualitative stability and ambiguity in model ecosystems. American Naturalist 161, 876-888.
19. Delgado, C.L., Wada, N., Rosegrant, M.W., Meijer, S. and Ahmed, M. (2003) Fish to 2020: Supply and Demand in Global Markets. World Fish Center Technical Report 62, IFPRI (International Food Policy) and World Fish Center, Penang, Malaysia. Available at: http://www.lib.noaa.gov/docaqua/noaa_matrix_program_reports/03_siwa_msangi.pdf
20. DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and Regions) (1999) Guidance on principles of risk assessment and monitoring for the release of genetically modified organisms, DETR/ACRE guidance note 12. Department of the Environment, Transport and Regions, London.
21. Devlin, R.H. and Donaldson, E.M. (1992) Containment of genetically altered fish with emphasis on salmonids. In: Hew, C.L. and Fletcher, G.L. (eds) Transgenic Fish. World Scientific Press, Singapore, pp. 229-265.
22. Drake, J.M. (2004) Allee effects and the risk of biological invasion. Risk Analysis 24, 795-802.
23. Drake, J.M. (2005) Risk analysis for species introductions: forecasting population growth of Eurasian ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernuus). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62, 1053-1059.
24. Drake, J.M. and Bossenbroek, J.M. (2004) The potential distribution of zebra mussels in the United States. BioScience 54, 931-941.
25. ERMA (Environmental Risk Management Authority) (1999) Identifying risks for applications under the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996, ER-TG-01-1 9/99. ERMA, New Zealand. Available at: http://www.ermanz.govt.nz/resources/publications/pdfs/ER-TG-01-1.pdf
26. EU (European Union) (2001) Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. Official Journal of the European Communities L106 (17.04.2001):1-38.
27. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2004a) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Part 1: World Review of Fisheries and Aquaculture. FAO, Rome. Available at: www.fao.org/documents/show_cdr.asp?url_file=/DOCREP/007/y5600e/y5600e00.htm
28. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2004b) Public Participation in Decision-making Regarding GMOs in Developing Countries: How to Effectively Involve Rural People. Electronic Forum on Biotechnology in Food and Agriculture: Conference 11. Available at: http://www.fao.org/Biotech/C12doc.htm
29. FAO/WHO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization) (2004) Safety assessment of foods derived from genetically modified animals, including fish, a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on food derived from biotechnology, Rome, Italy, 17-21 November 2003. Available at: http://www.who.int/foodsafety/biotech/meetings/ec_nov2003/en/
30. Ferson, S. (2005) Bayesian Methods in Risk Assessment. Applied Biomathematics, Setauket, New York.
31. Ferson, S. and Long, T.F. (1995) Conservative uncertainty propagation in environmental risk assessment. In: Hughes, J.S., Biddinger, G.R. and Mones, E. (eds) Environmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment, Volume 3. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, pp. 97-110.
32. Glicken, J. (2000) Getting stakeholder participation 'right': a discussion of the participatory processes and possible pitfalls. Environmental Science and Policy 3, 305-310.
33. Haimes, Y.Y. (1998) Risk Modelling, Assessment and Management. Wiley, New York.
34. Hallerman, E.M. and Kapuscinski, A.R. (1995) Incorporating risk assessment and risk management into public policies of genetically modified finfish and shellfish. Aquaculture 137, 9-17.
35. Hart, B., Burgman, M., Webb, A., Allison, G., Chapman, M., Duivenvoorden, L., Feehan, P., Grace, M., Lund, M., Pollino, C., Carey, J. and McCrea, A. (2005) Ecological Risk Management Framework for the Irrigation Industry. Report to the National Program for Sustainable Irrigation. Water Studies Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
36. Hastings, A., Cuddington, K., Davies, K.F., Dugaw, C.J., Elmendorf, S., Freestone, A., Harrison, S., Holland, M., Lambrinos, J., Malvadkar, B.A., Moore, K., Taylor, C. and Thomson, D. (2005) The spatial spread of invasions: new developments in theory and evidence. Ecology Letters 8, 91-101.
37. Hayes, K.R. (1997) Ecological Risk Assessment Review. CRIMP Technical Report 13, CSIRO Division of Marine Research, Hobart, Australia.
38. Hayes, K.R. (1998) Bayesian Statistical Inference in Ecological Risk Assessment. CRIMP Technical Report 17, CSIRO Division of Marine Research, Hobart, Australia.
39. Hayes, K.R. (2002a) Best Practise and Current Practise in Ecological Risk Assessment for Genetically Modified Organisms. Interim report for the Australian Government Department of Environment and Heritage. KRA Project 1: robust methodologies for GMO risk assessment. CSIRO Division of Marine Research, Hobart, Australia.
40. Hayes, K.R. (2002b) Identifying hazards in complex ecological systems. Part 1: fault tree analysis for biological invasions. Biological Invasions 4, 235-249.
41. Hayes, K.R. (2002c) Identifying hazards in complex ecological systems. Part 2: infections modes and effects analysis for biological invasions. Biological Invasions 4, 251-261.
42. Hayes, K.R. (2003) Biosecurity and the role of risk-assessment. In: Ruiz, G.M. and Carlton, J.T. (eds) Bioinvasions: Pathways, Vectors, and Management Strategies. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 382-414.
43. Hayes, K.R., Gregg Peter, C., Gupta, V.V.S.R., Jessop, R., Lonsdale, M., Sindel, B., Stanley, J. and Williams, C.K. (2004) Identifying hazards in complex ecological systems. Part 3: Hierarchical Holographic Model for herbicide tolerant oilseed rape. Environmental Biosafety Research 3, 1-20.
44. Hayes, K.R., Sliwa, C., Migus, S., McEnnulty, F. and Dunstan, P. (2005) National Priority Pests: Part II, Ranking of Australian Marine Pests. Final report for the Australian Government Department of Environment and Heritage, CSIRO Division of Marine Research, Hobart, Australia.
45. Hayes, K.R., Barry, S.C. and Lawrence, E. (in prep) Ballast Water Risk Assessment: Calculating the Probability of Survival in the Recipient Port using Life-cycle and Time-series Models.
46. Hayes, K.R. and Barry, S.C. (in press) Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success?. Biological Invasions
47. Hilbeck, A. and Andow, D.A. (2004) Environmental Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Organisms, Volume I. A Case Study of Bt Maize in Kenya. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
48. Hilbeck, A., Andow, D.A. and Fontes, E.M.G. (2006) Environmental Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Organisms, Volume 2. Methodologies for Assessing Bt Cotton in Brazil. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
49. Hill, R.A. and Sendashonga, C. (2003) General principles for risk assessment of living modified organisms: lessons from chemical risk assessment. Environmental Biosafety Research 2, 81-88.
50. Hobbs, B.F., Ludsin, S.A., Knight, R.L., Ryan, P.A., Biberhofer, J. and Ciborowski, J.J.H. (2002) Fuzzy cognitive mapping as a tool to define management objectives for complex ecosystems. Ecological Applications 12, 1548-1565.
51. Hughes, G. and Madden, L.V. (2003) Evaluating predictive models with application in regulatory policy for invasive weeds. Agricultural Systems 76, 755-774.
52. Kapuscinski, A.R. (2002) Controversies in designing useful ecological assessments of genetically engineered organisms. In: Letourneau, D.K. and Burrows, B.E. (eds) Genetically Engineered Organisms: Assessing Environmental and Human Health Effects. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 385-415.
53. Kapuscinski, A.R. (2005) Current scientific understanding of the environmental biosafety of transgenic fish and shellfish. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l' Office International des Epizooties 24, 309-322.
54. Kapuscinski, A.R. and Hallerman, E.M. (1990) Transgenic fish and public policy: I. Anticipating environmental impacts of transgenic fish. Fisheries 15, 2-11.
55. Kapuscinski, A.R. and Hallerman, E.M. (1991) Implications of introduction of transgenic fish into natural ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48(Suppl. 1), 99-107.
56. Kapuscinski, A.R., Nega, T. and Hallerman, E.M. (1999) Adaptive biosafety assessment and management regimes for aquatic genetically modified organisms in the environment. In: Pullin, R.S.V. and Bartley, D. (eds) Towards Policies for Conservation and Sustainable Use of Aquatic Genetic Resources. ICLARM Conference Proceedings, International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management, Makati City, The Philippines, pp. 225-251.
57. Kletz, T.A. (1999) Hazop and Hazan: Identifying and Assessing Process Industry Hazards. Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
58. Koehn, J. (2004) Carp (Cyprinus carpio) as a powerful invader in Australian waters. Freshwater Biology 49, 882-894.
59. Kohler, C.C. (1992) Environmental risk management of introduced aquatic organisms in aquaculture. In: Sindermann, C. and Hershberger, B. (eds) Introductions and Transfers of Aquatic Species. Selected papers from a Symposium held in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, 1990. ICES Marine Science Symposium 194, 15-20.
60. Leung, B., Lodge, D.M., Finnoff, D., Shogren, J.F., Lewis, M.A. and Lamberti, G. (2002) Anounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 269, 2407-2413.
61. Maclean, N. and Laight, R.J. (2000) Transgenic fish: an evaluation of benefits and risks. Fish and Fisheries 1, 146-172.
62. Muir, W.M. and Howard, R.D. (1999) Possible ecological risks of transgenic organism release when transgenes affect mating success: sexual selection and the Trojan gene hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 96, 13853-13856.
63. Muir, W.M. and Howard, R.D. (2001) Fitness components and ecological risk of transgenic release: a model using Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes). American Naturalist 158, 1-16.
64. Muir, W.M. and Howard, R.D. (2002) Assessment of possible ecological risks and hazards of transgenic fish with implications for other sexually reproducing organisms. Transgenic Research 11, 101-114.
65. Naylor, R., Hindar, K., Fleming, I.A., Goldburg, R., William, S., Volpe, J., Whoriskey, F., Eagle, J., Kelso, D. and Mangel, M. (2005) Fugitive salmon: assessing the risks of escaped fish from net-pen aquaculture. BioScience 55, 427-437.
66. NRC (1996) Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.nap.edu
67. NRC (2002) Environmental Effects of Transgenic Plants: The Scope and Adequacy of Regulation. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.nap.edu
68. Neubert, M.G. and Parker, I.M. (2004) Projecting rates of spread for invasive species. Risk Analysis 24, 817-831.
69. OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1986) Recombinant DNA Safety Considerations. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.
70. OGTR (Office of the Gene Technology Regulator) (2001) Risk Assessment Framework for License Applications to the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator. Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, Canberra, Australia.
71. Ozesmi, U. and Ozesmi, S. (2003) A participatory approach to ecosystem conservation: fuzzy cognitive maps and stakeholder group analysis in Uluabat Lake, Turkey. Environmental Management 31, 518-531.
72. Paisley, L.G., Karlsen, E., Jarp, J. and Mo, T.A. (1999) A Monte Carlo simulation model for assessing the risk of introduction of Gryodactylus salaris to the Tana River, Norway. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 37, 145-152.
73. Palady, P. (1995) Failure Modes and Effects Analysis: Predicting and Preventing Problems Before They Occur. PT Publications, West Palm Beach, Florida.
74. Pastorok, R.A., Bartell, S.M., Ferson, S. and Ginzburg, L.R. (2002) Ecological Modelling in Risk Assessment: Chemical Effects on Populations, Ecosystems and Landscapes. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida.
75. Peeler, E.J. and Thrush, M.A. (2004) Qualitative analysis of the risk of introducing Gryodactylus salaris into the United Kingdom. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 62, 103-113.
76. Pheloung, P.C., Williams, P.A. and Halloy, S.R. (1999) A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool for evaluating plant introductions. Journal of Environmental Management 57, 239-251.
77. Ramsey, D. and Veltman, C. (2005) Predicting the effects of perturbations on ecological communities: what can qualitative models offer?. Journal of Animal Ecology 74, 905-916.
78. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (1991) GENHAZ: A System for the Critical Appraisal of Proposals to Release Genetically Modified Organisms into the Environment. HMSO, London, UK.
79. Rykiel, E.J. (1996) Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation. Ecological Modelling 90, 229-244.
80. Saaty, T.L. (2001) The Analytical Hierarchy Process: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback. McGraw-Hill, New York.
81. Scientists' Working Group on Biosafety (1998) Manual for Assessing Ecological and Human Health Effects of Genetically Engineered Organisms. Part One: Introductory Materials and Supporting Text for Flowcharts. Part Two: Flowcharts and Worksheets. The Edmonds Institute, Edmonds, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.edmonds-institute.org/manual.html
82. Snow, A., Andow, D., Gepts, P., Hallerman, E., Powers, A., Tiedje, J. and Wolfenbarger, L. (2005) Ecological risks and benefits associated with the environmental release of GMOs. Ecological Applications 15, 377-404.
83. Suter, G.W. (1993) Ecological Risk Assessment. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida.
84. The Royal Society (1983) Risk Assessment: Report of a Royal Society Study Group. The Royal Society, London.
85. Tiedje, J.M., Colwell, R.K., Grossman, Y.L., Hodson, R.E., Lenski, R.E., Mack, R.N., and Regal, P.J. (1989) The planned introduction of genetically engineered organisms: ecological considerations and recommendations. Ecology 70, 298-315.
86. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (1995) International Technical Guidelines for Safety in Biotechnology. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya. Available at: http://www.biosafetyprotocol.be/UNEPGuid/Contents.html
87. Virtue, J.G., Groves, R.H. and Panetta, F.D. (2001) Towards a national system to determine the national significance of weeds in Australia. In: Groves, E.H., Panetta, F.D. and Virtue, J.G. (eds) Weed Risk Assessment. CSIRO Publishing, Canberra, Australia, pp. 125-150.