Models of interdependence propagation for the fragility assessment of urban networks

Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering -Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1887-1895

  Hernandez Fajardo, Isaac ^a   Dueñas Osorio, Leonardo ^a  

^a Rice University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; PROBABILITY; SOFTWARE TESTING;

DAMAGE PROPAGATION; EARTHQUAKE HAZARD; FRAGILITY ASSESSMENT; INDUCED DAMAGE; MODERN INFRASTRUCTURE; PROPAGATION STRATEGIES; REACTION SPEED; URBAN NETWORKS;

MONTE CARLO METHODS;

EID: 84856763442     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1201/b11332-280     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Ahuja, R.K., T.L. Magnanti, & J.B. Orlin (1993). Network flows: theory, algorithms, and applications. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
2. Albert, R., I. Albert, & G.L. Nakarado (2004, Feb). Structural vulnerability of the north american power grid. Phys. Rev. E 69(2), 025103.
3. Dueñas-Osorio, L., J.I. Craig, & B.J. Goodno (2007). Seismic response of critical interdependent networks. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 36(2), 285-306.
4. Dueñas-Osorio, L. & S.M. Vemuru (2009). Cascading failures in complex infrastructure systems. Structural Safety 31(2), 157-167. Risk Acceptance and Risk Communication, Risk Acceptance and Risk Communication.
5. Federal Emergency Management Agency, F. (2003). HAZUS-MH MR4 Technical Manual. Washington D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency, (FEMA).
6. Haimes, Y.Y. & P. Jiang (2001). Leontief-based model of risk in complex interconnected infrastructures. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 7(1), 1-12.
7. Hernandez-Fajardo, I. & L. Duenas Osorio (2009). Time sequential evolution of interdependent lifeline systems. In Proc. 10th ICOSSAR2009, Osaka, Japan.
8. Kim, Y (2007). Seismic loss assessment and mitigation of critical urban infrastructure systems. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois.
9. Lee, E.E., J.E. Mitchell, & W.A. Wallace (2007). Restoration of services in interdependent infrastructure systems: A network flows approach. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C 37(6), 1303-1317.
10. Motter, A.E. & Y.-C. Lai (2002, Dec). Cascade-based attacks on complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 66(6), 065102.
11. Ouyang, M., L. Hong, Z.-J. Mao, M.-H. Yu, & F. Qi (2009). A methodological approach to analyze vulnerability of interdependent infrastructures. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 17(5), 817-828.
12. Rinaldi, S., J. Peerenboom, & T. Kelly (2001, dec.). Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interde-pendencies. Control Systems Magazine, IEEE 21(6), 11-25.
13. Rosato, V., L. Issacharoff, F. Tiriticco, S. Meloni, S. De Porcelli-nis, & R. Setola (2008). Modelling interdependent infrastructures using interacting dynamical models. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures 4(1), 63-79.
14. Shinozuka, M., A. Rose, & R. Eguchi (1998). Engineering and Socioeconomic Impacts of Earthquakes-An Analysis of Electricity Lifeline Disruptions in the New Madrid area. Buffalo, N.Y.: Multidisciplinary and the National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER), Monograph 2.
15. Zhang, P., S. Peeta, & T. Friesz (2005, June). Dynamic game theoretic model of multi-layer infrastructure networks. Networks and Spatial Economics 5(2), 147-178.