Consistent consequence severity estimation

Process Safety Progress

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 9-16

  Summers, Angela ^a   Vogtmann, William ^a   Smolen, Steven ^a  

^a SIS TECH Solutions   (United States)

Author keywords

Consequence; Layers of protection analysis; Quantitative; Risk analysis

Indexed keywords

CONSEQUENCE; CONSEQUENCE ESTIMATION; EXPLOSIVITY; HAZARDOUS EVENTS; LAYERS OF PROTECTION ANALYSIS; LOOK UP TABLE; PROCESS CHEMICALS; PROCESS HAZARDS ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE; RISK ANALYSIS METHODS; RISK REDUCTIONS; SEMI-QUANTITATIVE; TEAM ASSESSMENT; TEAM MEMBERS;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RISK ANALYSIS; TABLE LOOKUP;

RISK PERCEPTION;

EID: 84856760375     PISSN: 10668527     EISSN: 15475913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prs.10502     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. CCPS/AIChE, Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, 3rd ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2008.
2. CCPS/AIChE, Layer of Protection Analysis: Simplified Process Risk Assessment, Concept Series, New York, 2001.
3. CCPS/AIChE Guidelines for Process Safety Metrics, Wiley, New York, 2010.
4. CCPS/AIChE, Guidelines for Safe and Reliable Instrumented Protective Systems, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2007.
5. OSHA, Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals, 29 CFR Part 1910.119; Federal Register, Vol. 57, No. 36, Washington, DC, 1992.
6. CCPS/AIChE, Guidelines for Developing Quantitative Safety Risk Criteria, Wiley, New York, 2009.
7. EPA, Accidental Release Prevention Requirements, 40 CFR Part 68; Federal Register, Vol. 61, No. 120, Washington, DC, 1996.
8. EPA, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Aloha Users Manual, The CAMEO Software System, Washington, DC, 2007.