Effects of species' traits and data characteristics on distribution models of threatened invertebrates;Efectos de las características ecológicas y de los datos sobre los modelos de distribución de invertebrados protegidos

Animal Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 229-247

  Chefaoui, Rosa M ^a   Lobo, Jorge M ^a   Hortal, Joaquín ^a,b  

^a MUSEO NACIONAL DE CIENCIAS NATURALES   (Spain)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF GOIÁS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Ecological traits; Geographical distribution range; Iberian peninsula; Predictive accuracy; Sample size; Species distribution modelling

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; DETECTION METHOD; GIS; HABITAT USE; INVERTEBRATE; NUMERICAL MODEL; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; PREDICTION; SPECIES CONSERVATION; SPECIES OCCURRENCE;

IBERIAN PENINSULA;

INVERTEBRATA;

EID: 84856759663     PISSN: 1578665X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Austin, M. P., 1980. Searching for a model for use in vegetation analysis. Vegetatio, 42: 11-21.
2. Austin, M. P. & Meyers, J. A., 1996. Current approaches to modelling the environmental niche of eucalypts: implications for management of forest biodiversity. Forest Ecology and Management, 85: 95-106.
3. Beaumont, L. J., Gallagher, R. V., Downey, P. O., Thuiller, W., Leishman, M. R. & Hughes, L., 2009. Modelling the impact of Hieracium spp. on protected areas in Australia under future climates. Ecography, 32: 757-764.
4. Brotons, L., Thuiller, W., Araújo, M. B. & Hirzel, A. H., 2004. Presence-absence versus presence-only modelling methods for predicting bird habitat suitability. Ecography, 27: 437-448.
5. Burgman, M. A. & Fox, J. C., 2003. Bias in species range estimates from minimum convex polygons: implications for conservation and options for improved planning. Animal Conservation, 6: 19-28.
6. Busby, J. R., 1991. BIOCLIM-a bioclimate analysis and prediction system. In: Nature Conservation: Cost effective biological surveys and data analysis: 64-68 (C. R. Margules & M. P. Austin, Eds.). CSIRO, Melbourne.
7. Cabeza, M., Arponen, A., Jäättelä, L., Kujala, H., van Teeffelen, A. & Hanski, I., 2010. Conservation planning with insects at three different spatial scales. Ecography, 33: 54-63.
8. Carrascal, L. M., Seoane, J., Palomino, D., Alonso, C. L., Lobo, J. M., 2006. Species-specific features affect the ability of census-derived models to map winter avian distribution. Ecological Research, 21: 681-691.
9. Castillejo, J., 1990. Babosas de la Península Ibérica. I. Los Ariónidos. Catálogo crítico y mapas de distribución (Gastrópoda, Pulmonata, Arionidae). Iberus, 9: 331-345.
10. Chefaoui, R. M. & Lobo, J. M., 2007. Assessing the conservation status of an Iberian moth using pseudo-absences. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 8: 2507-2516.
11. Chefaoui, R. M. & Lobo, J. M., 2008. Assessing the effects of pseudo-absences on predictive distribution model performance. Ecological Modelling, 210: 478-486.
12. Chefaoui, R. M., Hortal, J. & Lobo, J. M., 2005. Potential distribution modelling, niche characterization and conservation status assessment using GIS tools: a case study of Iberian Copris species. Biological Conservation, 122: 327-338.
13. Clark Labs, 2000. Global Change Data Archive Vol. 3. 1 km Global Elevation Model. Clark University.
14. Clark Labs, 2003. Idrisi Kilimanjaro. Clark Labs, Worcester, MA.
15. Dixon, P. M., Ellison, A. M. & Gotelli, J., 2005. Improving the precision of estimates of the frequency or rare events. Ecology, 86: 1114-1123.
16. Elith, J. & Leathwick, J. R., 2007. Predicting species' distributions from museum and herbarium records using multiresponse models fitted with multivariate adaptive regression splines. Diversity and Distributions, 13: 165-175.
17. Franklin, J., 2009. Mapping species distributions: Spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge University Press, New York.
18. Galante, E. & Verdú, J. R., 2000. Los Artrópodos de la 'Directiva Hábitat' en España. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid.
19. García-Barros, E. & Herranz, J., 2001. Nuevas localidades de Proserpinus proserpina (Pallas, 1772) y Graellsia isabelae (Graells, 1849) del centro peninsular. SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, 29: 183-184.
20. Grenyer, R., Orme, C. D. L., Jackson, S. F., Thomas, G. H., Davies, R. G., Davies, T. J., Jones, K. E., Olson, V. A., Ridgely, R. S., Rasmussen, P. C., Ding, T. S., Bennett, P. M., Blackburn, T. M., Gaston, K. J., Gittleman, J. L. & Owens, I. P. F., 2006. Global distribution and conservation of rare and threatened vertebrates. Nature, 444: 93-96.
21. Grosso-Silva, J. M., 1999. Contribuição para o conhecimento dos lucanídeos (Coleoptera, Lucanidae) de Portugal. Boletín de la S.E.A., 25: 11-15.
22. Grupo de Trabajo sobre Lucanidae Ibéricos, 2000. Proyecto Ciervo Volante (PCV). Boletín de la S.E.A., 27: 108-109.
23. Hanspach, J., Kühn, I., Pompe, S. & Klotz, S., 2010. Predictive performance of plant species distribution models depends on species traits. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 12: 219-225.
24. Hernández, P. A., Graham, C. H., Master, L. L. & Albert, D. L., 2006. The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography, 29: 773-785.
25. Hirzel, A. H., Hausser, J. & Perrin, N., 2007. Biomapper 4.0. Division of Conservation Biology, University of Bern, Laussane.
26. Hortal, J., Jiménez-Valverde, A., Gómez, J. F., Lobo, J. M. & Baselga, A., 2008. Historical bias in biodiversity inventories affects the observed realized niche of the species. Oikos, 117: 847-858.
27. Hortal, J., Lobo, J. M. & Jimenez-Valverde, A., 2007. Limitations of biodiversity databases: case study on seed-plant diversity in Tenerife, Canary Islands. Conservation Biology, 21: 853-863.
28. Hortal, J., Roura-Pascual, N., Sanders, N. J. & Rahbek, C., 2010. Understanding (insect) species distributions across spatial scales. Ecography, 33: 51-53.
29. Instituto Geográfico Nacional, 1995. Mapa de suelos del Atlas Nacional de España (Edafología). CSIC/ IRNAS, Sevilla.
30. Jiménez-Valverde, A. & Lobo, J. M., 2006. The ghost of unbalanced species distribution data in geographical model predictions. Diversity and Distributions, 12: 521-524.
31. Jiménez-Valverde, A. & Lobo, J. M., 2007. Threshold criteria for conversion of probability of species presence to either-or presence-absence. Acta Oecologica, 31: 361-369.
32. Jiménez-Valverde, A., Lobo, J. M. & Hortal, J., 2008. Not as good as they seem: the importance of concepts in species distribution modelling. Diversity and Distributions, 14: 885-890.
33. Jiménez-Valverde, A., Lobo, J. M. & Hortal, J., 2009. The effect of prevalence and its interaction with sample size on the reliability of species distribution models. Community Ecology, 10: 196-205.
34. King, G. & Zeng, L., 2000. Logistic regression in rare events data. The Global Burden of Disease 2000 in Aging Populations, Research Paper No. 2. Havard Burden of Disease Unit, Cambridge. 6th October 2010.
35. Legendre, P. & Legendre, L., 1998. Numerical Ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
36. Lobo, J. M., 2008. More complex distribution models or more representative data? Biodiversity Informatics, 5: 14-19.
37. Lobo, J. M., Baselga, A., Hortal, J., Jiménez-Valverde, A. & Gómez, J. F., 2007. How does the knowledge about the spatial distribution of Iberian dung beetle species accumulate over time? Diversity and Distributions, 13: 772-780.
38. Lobo, J. M., Jiménez-Valverde, A. & Hortal, J., 2010. The uncertain nature of absences and their importance in species distribution modelling. Ecography, 33: 103-114.
39. Lobo, J. M., Jiménez-Valverde, A. & Real, R., 2008. AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 17: 145-151.
40. Lobo, J. M., Verdú, J. R. & Numa, C., 2006. Environmental and geographical factors affecting the Iberian distribution of flightless Jekelius species Coleoptera: (Geotrupidae). Diversity and Distributions, 12:179-188.
41. López-Sebastián, E., López, J. C., Juan, M. J. & Selfa, J., 2002. Primeras citas de mariposa isabelina en la Comunidad Valenciana. Quercus, 193: 10-13.
42. Luoto, M., Pöyry, J., Heikkinen, R. K. & Saarinen, K., 2005. Uncertainty of bioclimate envelope models based on the geographical distribution of species. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 14: 575-584.
43. Marmion, M., Luoto, M., Heikkinen, R. K. & Thuiller, W., 2008. The performance of state-of-the-art modelling techniques depends on geographical distribution of species. Ecological Modelling, 220: 3512-3520.
44. Martínez-Orti, A., 2004. Descripción de los moluscos terrestres del Valle del Najerilla. Noticiario de la Sociedad Española de Malacología, 41: 30-32.
45. Mateo, R. G., Felicísimo, Á. M. & Muñoz, J., 2010. Effects of the number of presences on reliability and stability of MARS species distribution models: the importance of regional niche variation and ecological heterogeneity. Journal of Vegetation Science, 21: 908-922.
46. McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J. A., 1989. Generalized Linear Models. Chapman & Hall, London.
47. McPherson, J. M. & Jetz, W., 2007. Effects of species' ecology on the accuracy of distribution models. Ecography, 30: 135-151.
48. McPherson, J. M., Jetz, W. & Rogers, D. J., 2004. The effects of species' range sizes on the accuracy of distribution models: ecological phenomenon or statistical artefact? Journal of Applied Ecology, 41: 811-823.
49. Newbold, T., Reader, T., Zalat, S., El-Gabbas, A. & Gilbert, F., 2009. Effect of characteristics of butterfly species on the accuracy of distribution models in an arid environment. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18: 3629-3641.
50. Olden, J. D., Jackson, D. A. & Peres-Neto, P., 2002. Predictive models of fish species distributions: a note on proper validation and chance predictions. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 131: 329-336.
51. Pérez-Bote, J. L., García, J. M., Ferri, F. & Moreno, J. A., 2001. Nueva cita de Lucanus cervus (Linnaeus, 1758) en Extremadura (Coleoptera: Lucanidae). Boletín de la S.E.A., 28: 130.
52. Pöyry, J., Luoto, M., Heikkinen, R. K. & Saarinen, K., 2008. Species traits are associated with the quality of bioclimatic models. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 17: 403-414.
53. R Development Core Team, 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 6th October 2010.
54. Raimundo, R., Algarvio, R., Casas Novas, P. & Figuereiredo, D., 2001. Cartography of some species of xilophagous and xilomicetophagous insects in Quercus suber and Quercus rotundifolia in Alentejo using GIS. Suplemento ao Boletim da Sociedade Portuguesa de Entomología, 6: 459-468.
55. Reutter, B., Helfer, V., Hirzel, A. H. & Vogel, P., 2003. Modelling habitat-suitability using museum collections: an example with three sympatric Apodemus species from the Alps. Journal of Biogeography, 30: 581-590.
56. Ripley, B. D., 1996. Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks. Cambridge University Press.
57. Rocchini, D., Hortal, J., Lengyel, S., Lobo, J. M., Jiménez-Valverde, A., Ricotta, C., Bacaro, G. & Chiarucci, A., 2011. Uncertainty in species distribution mapping and the need for maps of ignorance. Progress in Physical Geography, 35: 211-226.
58. Rosas, G., Ramos, M. A. & García Valdecasas, A., 1992. Invertebrados españoles protegidos por convenios internacionales. ICONA, Madrid.
59. Santika, T., 2010. Assessing the effect of prevalence on the predictive performance of species distribution models using simulated data. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20: 181-192.
60. Schröder, B., 2004. ROC Plotting and AUC Calculation Transferability Test. Potsdam University, Potsdam. 6th October 2010.
61. Segurado, P. & Araújo, M. B., 2004. An evaluation of methods for modelling species distributions. Journal of Biogeography, 31: 1555-1568.
62. Seoane, J., Carrascal, L. M., Alonso, C. L. & Palomino, D., 2005. Species-specific traits associated to prediction errors in bird habitat suitability modelling. Ecological Modelling, 185: 299-308.
63. Soria, S., Abos, F. & Martín, E., 1986. Influencia de los tratamientos con diflubenzurón ODC 45% sobre pinares en las poblaciones de Graellsia isabelae (Graells) (Lep. Syssphingidae) y reseña de su biología. Boletín de sanidad vegetal, 12: 29-50.
64. StatSoft, I., 2001. Statistica. Data analysis software system, Tulsa.
65. Stockwell, D. R. B. & Peterson, A. T., 2002. Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models. Ecological Modelling, 148: 1-13.
66. Syphard, A. D. & Franklin, J., 2010. Species traits affect the performance of species distribution models for plants in southern California. Journal of Vegetation Science, 21: 177-189.
67. VanDerWal, J., Shoo, L. P., Graham, C. & Williams, S. E., 2009. Selecting pseudo-absence data for presence-only distribution modeling: How far should you stray from what you know? Ecological Modelling, 220: 589-594.
68. Veloz, S. D., 2009. Spatially autocorrelated sampling falsely inflates measures of accuracy for presence-only niche models. Journal of Biogeography, 36: 2290-2299.
69. Verdú, J. R. & Galante, E., 2002. Climatic stress, food availability and human activity as determinants of endemism patterns in the Mediterranean region: the case of dung beetles Coleoptera, Scarabeoidea) in the Iberian Peninsula. Diversity and Distributions, 8: 259-274.
70. Verdú, J. R. & Galante, E., 2006. Libro Rojo de los Invertebrados de España. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid.
71. Viejo Montesinos, J. L., 1992. Biografía de un naturalista y biología del lepidóptero por él descrito. Graells y la Graellsia. Quercus, 74: 22-30.
72. Wisz, M. S., Hijmans, R. J., Li J., Peterson, A. T., Graham, C. H., Guisan, A. & N. P. S. D. W. Group, 2008. Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Diversity and Distributions, 14: 763-773.
73. Wood, S. N. & Augustin, N. H., 2002. GAMs with integrated model selection using penalized regression splines and applications to environmental modelling. Ecological Modelling, 157: 157-177.
74. Zaniewski, A. E., Lehmann, A. & Overton, J. M., 2002. Predicting species spatial distributions using presence-only data: a case study of native New Zealand ferns. Ecological Modelling, 157: 261-280.
75. Zweig, M. H. & Campbell, G., 1993. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clinical Chemistry, 39: 561-577.