Mapping patient-specific functional scale (PSFS) items to the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF)

Physical Therapy

Volumn 92, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 310-317

  Fairbairn, Kate ^a   May, Kate ^b   Yang, Yvonne ^c   Balasundar, Sharan ^d   Hefford, Cheryl ^e   Haxby Abbott, J ^f  

^a Prohealth Physiotherapy Ltd   (New Zealand)

^b West Coast District Health Board   (New Zealand)

^c Queensland Government   (Australia)

^d Prime Physiotherapy   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^f UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; DISABLED PERSON; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; NEW ZEALAND;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; NEW ZEALAND;

EID: 84856757904     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: 15386724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20090382     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Sykes C. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: relevance and applicability to physiotherapy. Adv Physiother. 2008;10:110-118.
2. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
3. Levack W. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): application to physiotherapy. N Z J Physiother. 2004;32:1-2.
4. Üstün TB, Chatterji S, Bickenbach J, et al. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a new tool for understanding disability and health. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:565-571.
5. Abrams D, Davidson M, Harrick J, et al. Monitoring the change: current trends in outcome measure usage in physiotherapy. Man Ther. 2006;11:46-53.
6. Brockow T, Cieza A, Kuhlow H, et al. Identifying the concepts contained in outcome measures of clinical trials on musculoskeletal disorders and chronic widespread pain using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a reference. J Rehabil Med. 2004;44(suppl):30-36.
7. Kay TM, Myers AM, Huijbregts MPJ. How far have we come since 1992? A comparative survey of physiotherapists' use of outcome measures. Physiother Can. 2001; 54:268-275.
8. Ustun B, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N. Comments from WHO for the Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine Special Supplement on ICF Core Sets. J Rehabil Med. 2004; 44(suppl):7-8.
9. Stucki G, Cieza A, Ewert T, et al. Application of the International Classifcation of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice. Disabil Rehabil. 2002; 24:281-282.
10. Jolles BM, Buchbinder R, Beaton DE. A study compared nine patient-specific indices for musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:791-801.
11. Stratford PW, Gill C, Westaway M, Binkley J. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: a report of a patient specific measure. Physiother Can. 1995;47: 258-263.
12. Kowalchuk Horn K, Jennings S, Richardson G, et al. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: psychometrics, clinimetrics and application as a clinical outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. In press.
13. Chatman AB, Hyams SP, Neel JM, et al. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: measurement properties in patients with knee dysfunction. Phys Ther. 1997;77:820-829.
14. Westaway MD, Stratford PW, Binkley JM. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27:331-338.
15. Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, et al. The reliability and construct validity of the Neck Disability Index and Patient-Specific Functional Scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Spine. 2006;31:598-602.
16. Gibbs L, Kealy M, Willis K, et al. What have sampling and data collection got to do with good qualitative research? Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007;31:540-544.
17. Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2006;5:1-11.
18. Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, et al. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:212-218.
19. Reed GM, Lux JB, Bufka LF, et al. Operationalizing the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in clinical settings. Rehabil Psychol. 2005;50:122-131.
20. ICF Australian User Guide. Version 1.0. Disability Series. Canberra, New South Wales, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2003.
21. Dixon D, Johnston M, McQueen M, Court- Brown C. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) can measure the impairment, activity limitations and participation restriction constructs from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:114.
22. Green J, Willis K, Hughes E, et al. Generating best evidence from qualitative research: the role of data analysis. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007;31:545-550.
23. Xiong T, Hartley S. Challenges in linking health-status outcome measures and clinical assessment tools to the ICF. Adv Physiother. 2008;10:152-156.
24. The Read Codes, Version 3. London, United Kingdom: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
25. Copeland JM, Taylor WJ, Dean SG. Factors influencing the use of outcome measures for patients with low back pain: a survey of New Zealand physical therapists. Phys Ther. 2008;88:1492-1505.
26. Dixon D, Pollard B, Johnston M. What does the Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire measure? Pain. 2007;130:249-253.
27. Perenboom R, Chorus A. Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil. 2003; 25:577-587.
28. Badley EM. Enhancing the conceptual clarity of the activity and participation components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:2335-2345.
29. Jette AM, Haley SM, Kooyoomjian JT. Are the ICF activity and participation dimensions distinct? J Rehabil Med. 2003;35: 145-149.
30. Cieza A, Stucki G. Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Qual Life Res. 2005;14: 1225-1237.
31. Sigl T, Cieza A, Brockow T, et al. Content comparison of low back pain-specific measures based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Clin J Pain. 2006;22:147-153.
32. Resnik L, Plow MA. Measuring participation as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: an evaluation of existing measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90: 856-866.
33. Silva Drummond A, Ferreira Sampaio R, Cotta Mancini M, et al. Linking the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. J Hand Ther. 2007;20:336-343.