Risk factors of sagittal decompensation after long posterior instrumentation and fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 17, 2010, Pages 1595-1601

  Cho, Kyu Jung ^a   Suk, Se Il ^b   Park, Seung Rim ^a   Kim, Jin Hyok ^b   Kang, Suk Bong ^a   Kim, Hyung Suk ^a   Oh, Seung Jae ^a  

^a Inha University Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Inje University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

adult spinal deformity; degenerative lumbar scoliosis; risk factor; sagittal decompensation; sagittal imbalance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE SCREW; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SCOLIOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LORDOSIS; LUMBAR SPINE; LUMBOSACRAL SPINE; MALE; PREOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDARTHROSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SACRAL SPINAL CORD; SAGITTAL DECOMPENSATION; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE FUSION; SPINE INJURY; SPINE STABILIZATION;

AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SACRUM; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; THORACIC VERTEBRAE;

EID: 77955466322     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bdad89     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance). Spine 1999;24:1712-1720
2. Potter BK, Lenke LG, Kuklo TR. Prevention and management of iatrogenic flatback deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86-A:1793-1808
3. Farcy JP, Schwab FJ. Management of flatback and related kyphotic decompensation syndromes. Spine 1997;22:2452-2457
4. Lee CS, Lee CK, Kim YT, et al. Dynamic sagittal imbalance of the spine in degenerative flat back: significance of pelvic tilt in surgical treatment. Spine 2001;26:2029-2035
5. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Sagittal thoracic decompensation following long adult lumbar spinal instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1: causes, prevalence, and risk factor analysis. Spine 2006;31:2359-2366
6. Yang SH, Chen PQ. Proximal kyphosis after short posterior fusion for thoracolumbar scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003:152-158
7. Edwards CC II, Bridwell KH, Patel A, et al. Thoracolumbar deformity arthrodesis to L5 in adults: the fate of the L5-S1 disc. Spine 2003;28:2122-2131
8. Eck KR, Bridwell KH, Ungacta FF, et al. Complications and results of long adult deformity fusions down to l4, l5, and the sacrum. Spine 2001;26: E182-92.
9. Lagrone MO, Bradford DS, Moe JH, et al. Treatment of symptomatic flatback after spinal fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:569-580
10. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, et al. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine 2005;30:2024-2029
11. Bridwell KH. Causes of sagittal spinal imbalance and assessment of the extent of needed correction. Instr Course Lect 2006;55:567-575
12. Kwon BK, Elgafy H, Keynan O, et al. Progressive junctional kyphosis at the caudal end of lumbar instrumented fusion: etiology, predictors, and treatment. Spine 2006;31:1943-1951
13. Cho KJ, Suk SI, Park SR, et al. Arthrodesis to L5 versus S1 in long instrumentation and fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2009; 18:531-537
14. Shufflebarger H, Suk SI, Mardjetko S. Debate: determining the upper instrumented vertebra in the management of adult degenerative scoliosis: stopping at T10 versus L1. Spine 2006;31(suppl 19):S185-94.
15. Glattes RC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion: incidence, outcomes, and risk factor analysis. Spine 2005;30:1643-1649
16. Gilad R, Gandhi CD, Arginteanu MS, et al. Uncorrected sagittal plane imbalance predisposes to symptomatic instrumentation failure. Spine J 2008; 8:911-917
17. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J, et al. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 1998;7:99-103.
18. Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, et al. The importance of spinopelvic balance in L5-S1 developmental spondylolisthesis: a review of pertinent radiologic measurements. Spine 2005;30(suppl 6):S27-34.
19. Cunningham BW, Lewis SJ, Long J, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbosacral reconstruction techniques for spondylolisthesis: an in vitro porcine model. Spine 2002;27:2321-2327
20. O'Shaughnessy BA, Ondra SL. Measuring, preserving, and restoring sagittal spinal balance. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2007;18:347-356
21. Simmons ED. Surgical treatment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with associated scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001:45-53.
22. Godde S, Fritsch E, Dienst M, et al. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion: clinical case series. Spine 2003;28:1693-1699
23. Cho KJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Comparison of Smith-Petersen versus pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of fixed sagittal imbalance. Spine 2005;30:2030-7; discussion 2038.