Bidirectional introgression between loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and shortleaf pine (P. echinata Mill.) has increased since the 1950s

Tree Genetics and Genomes

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 725-735

  Stewart, John F ^a   Tauer, Charles G ^a   Nelson, C D ^b  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological genetics; Hybridization; Introgression

Indexed keywords

PINUS ECHINATA; PINUS TAEDA;

EID: 84856733475     PISSN: 16142942     EISSN: 16142950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-011-0459-2     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Allendorf FW, Luikart G (2007) Conservation and the genetics of populations. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Hoboken, NJ, p 642.
2. Allendorf FW, Leary RF, Spruell P, Wenburg JK (2001) The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol Evol 16: 613-622.
3. Baker JB, Langdon OG (1990) Pinus taeda L. loblolly pine. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH (eds) Silvics of North America. Volume 1: Conifers. Agricultural Handbook 654. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D. C., pp 497-512.
4. Bohrerova Z, Bohrer G, Cho KD, Bolch MA, Linden KG (2009) Determining the viability response of pine pollen to atmospheric conditions during long-distance dispersal. Ecol Appl 19: 656-667.
5. Buggs RJA (2007) Empirical study of hybrid zone movement. Heredity 99: 301-312.
6. Chagne D, Chaumeil P, Ramboer A, Collada C, Guevara A, Cervera MT, Vendramin GG, Garcia V, Frigerio JM, Echt C, Richardson T, Plomion C (2004) Cross-species transferability and mapping of genomic and cDNA SSRs in pines. Theor Appl Genet 109: 1204-1214.
7. Chen JW, Tauer CG, Bai G, Huang Y, Payton ME, Holley AG (2004) Bidirectional introgression between Pinus taeda and Pinus echinata: evidence from morphological and molecular data. Can J For Res 34: 2508-2516.
8. Cotton MH, Hicks RR Jr, Flake RH (1975) Morphological variability among loblolly and shortleaf pines of east Texas with reference to natural hybridization. Castanea 40: 309-319.
9. Dorman KW, Barber JC (1956) Time of flowering and seed ripening in southern pines. U. S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Station Paper 72.
10. Echt CS, Saha S, Deemer DL, Nelson CD (2011) Microsatellite DNA in genomic survey sequences and UniGenes of loblolly pine. Tree Genet Genomes 7: 773-780.
11. Edwards-Burke MA, Hamrick JL, Price RA (1997) Frequency and direction of hybridization in sympatric populations of Pinus taeda (Mill) and P. echinata (Pinaceae). Am J Bot 84: 879-886.
12. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure: extensions to linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164: 1567-1587.
13. Goodman MM (1967) The identification of hybrid plants in segregating populations. Evolution 21: 334-340.
14. Hare RC, Switzer GL (1969) Introgression with shortleaf pine may explain rust resistance in western loblolly pine. USDA Forest Service, Research Note SO-88. Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, p 2.
15. Hicks RR Jr (1973) Evaluation of morphological characters for use in identifying loblolly pine, shortleaf pine, and loblolly × shortleaf hybrids. Castanea 38: 182-189.
16. Holsinger KE (1993) The evolutionary dynamics of fragmented plant populations. In: Kingsolver JG, Kareiva PM, Huey RB (eds) Biotic Interactions and Global Change. Sinauer Associates, Stamford, pp 198-216.
17. Huneycutt M, Askew G (1989) Electrophoretic identification of loblolly pine-shortleaf pine hybrids. Silvae Genet 38: 3-4.
18. Jump AS, Peñuelas J (2006) Genetic effects of chronic habitat fragmentation in a wind-pollinated tree. PNAS 103: 8096-8100.
19. Knapp EE, Goedde MA, Rice KJ (2001) Pollen-limited reproduction in blue oak: implications for wind pollination in fragmented populations. Oecologia 128: 48-55.
20. Lawson ER (1990) Pinus echinata Mill. shortleaf pine. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH (eds) Silvics of North America. Volume 1: Conifers. Agricultural Handbook 654. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D. C., pp 316-326.
21. Mergen F, Stairs GR, Snyder EB (1965) Natural and controlled loblolly × shortleaf pine hybrids in Mississippi. Forest Sci 11: 306-314.
22. Nelson CD, Josserand S, Echt CS, Koppelman J (2007) Loblolly pine SSR markers for shortleaf pine genetics. In: Kabrick JM, Dey DC, Gwaze D (eds) Shortleaf pine restoration and ecology in the Ozarks: Proceedings of a symposium; November 7-9, 2006; Springfield, MO. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-15. Newtown Square, PA: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, pp. 95-98.
23. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6: 288-295.
24. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
25. Raja RG, Tauer CG, Wittwer RF, Huang YH (1997) Isoenzyme variation and genetic structure in natural populations of shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata). Can J For Res 27: 740-749.
26. Raja RG, Tauer CG, Wittwer RF, Huang YH (1998) Regeneration methods affect genetic variation and structure in shortleaf pin (Pinus echinata Mill.). For Genet 5: 171-178.
27. Rhymer JM, Simberloff D (1996) Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27: 83-109.
28. Schreiner EJ (1937) Improvement of forest trees. 1937. Yearbook of Agriculture, USDA pp 1242-1279.
29. Schultz RP (1997) Loblolly pine: the ecology and culture of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). U. S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Agricultural Handbook 713, Washington, D. C., p 514.
30. Seager R, Tzanova A, Nakamura J (2009) Drought in the southeastern United States: causes, variability over the last millennium, and the potential for future hydrodynamic change. J Climate 22: 5021-5045.
31. Sork VL, Davis FW, Smouse PE, Apsit VJ, Dyer RJ, Fernandez JF, Kuhn B (2002) Pollen movement in declining populations of California Valley oak, Quercus lobata: where have all the fathers gone? Mol Ecol 11: 1657-1668.
32. Stewart JF, Liu Y, Tauer CG, Nelson CD (2010) Microsatellite versus AFLP analyses of pre-management introgression levels in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.). Tree Genet Genomes 6: 853-862.
33. Walker LC, Wiant HV (1966) Silviculture of shortleaf pine. Bull. No. 0. Nacogdoches, TX. Stephen F. Austin State College, School of Forestry. pp 59.
34. Williams CG (2010) Long-distance pine pollen still germinates after meso-scale dispersal. Am J Bot 97: 846-855.
35. Wolf DE, Takebayashi N, Rieseberg LH (2001) Predicting the risk of extinction through hybridization. Conserv Biol 15: 1039-1053.
36. Wright HA, Bailey AW (1982) Fire ecology: United States and southern Canada. Wiley, New York, p 501.
37. Xu S, Tauer CG, Nelson CD (2008a) Natural hybridization within seed sources of shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Tree Genet Genomes 4: 849-858.
38. Xu S, Tauer CG, Nelson CD (2008b) Genetic diversity within and among populations of shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Tree Genet Genomes 4: 859-868.
39. Zobel BJ (1953) Are there natural loblolly-shortleaf pine hybrids? J For 51: 494-495.