Fusion of high resolution aerial multispectral and lidar data: Land cover in the context of urban mosquito habitat

Remote Sensing

Volumn 3, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 2364-2383

  Hartfield, Kyle A ^a   Landau, Katheryn I ^a   van Leeuwen, Willem J D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Arizona; Data fusion; Land cover classification; LiDAR; Mosquito; Multispectral; Public health; Tucson; Urban; West nile virus

Indexed keywords

ARIZONA; LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION; MOSQUITO; MULTI-SPECTRAL; TUCSON; URBAN; WEST NILE VIRUS;

DATA FUSION; ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY; LAND USE; LANDFORMS; OPTICAL RADAR; PUBLIC HEALTH; RAIN; REMOTE SENSING;

SENSOR DATA FUSION;

ALGORITHMS; DISEASES; ECOSYSTEMS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INSECTS; LAND USE; PLANTS; RADAR; REMOTE SENSING; SENSORS;

EID: 84856732577     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs3112364     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. NCID. Mosquito-Borne Diseases, Infectious Disease Information; NCID, CDC: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2007. Available online: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/list_mosquitoborne.htm (accessed on 2 September 2010).
2. Griffin, L.F.; Knight, J.M.; Dale, P.E.R. Identifying mosquito habitat microtopography in an Australian mangrove forest using LiDAR derived elevation data. Wetlands 2010, 30, 929-937.
3. Germaine, K.A.; Hung, M.C. Delineation of impervious surface from multispectral imagery and LiDAR incorporating knowledge based expert system rules. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 2011, 77, 75-85.
4. Cline, B.L. New eyes for epidemiologists: Aerial photography and other remote sensing techniques. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1970, 92, 85-89.
5. Saxena, R.; Nagpal, B.N.; Srivastava, A.; Gupta, S.K.; Dash, A.P. Application of spatial technology in malaria research & control: Some new insights. Indian J. Med. Res. 2009, 130, 125-132.
6. Hugh-Jones, M. Applications of remote sensing to the identification of the habitats of parasites and disease vectors. Parasitol. Today 1989, 5, 244-251.
7. Herbreteau, V.; Salem, G.; Souris, M.; Hugot, J.-P.; Gonzalez, J.-P. Thirty years of use and improvement of remote sensing, applied to epidemiology: From early promises to lasting frustration. Health Place 2007, 13, 400-403.
8. Morin, C.; Comrie, A. Modeled response of the West Nile virus vector Culex quinquefasciatus to changing climate using the dynamic mosquito simulation model. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2010, 54, 517-529.
9. WRCC. Arizona Climate Summaries; Western Regional Climate Center: Reno, NV, USA. Available online: http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?az8815 (accessed on 20 May 2011).
10. Ridd, M.K. Exploring a V-I-S (Vegetation-Impervious Surface-Soil) model for urban ecosystem analysis through remote sensing: comparative anatomy for cities. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1995, 16, 2165-2185.
11. AFPO. National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP); Aerial Photography Field Office, USDA: Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2011. Available online: http://www.fsa.usda.gov/FSA/apfoapp?area=home&subject=prog&topic=nai (accessed on 11 October 2011).
12. Tucker, C.J. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens. Environ. 1979, 8, 127-150.
13. Lefsky, M.A.; Cohen, W.B.; Parker, G.G.; Harding, D.J. Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. Bioscience 2002, 52, 19-30.
14. Fowler, R.A. The lowdown on LIDAR. Earth Observation Magazine March 2000; pp. 27-30.
15. Wehr, A.; Lohr, U. Airborne laser scanning-An introduction and overview. ISPRS J. Photogramm. 1999, 54, 68-82.
16. STGS. Pima Association of Governments 2008 Digital Orthophotography and LiDAR LiDAR Report; Sanborn Total Geospatial Solutions: Springs, CO, USA, 2009.
17. Fowler, R.A. LIDAR processing-It's not black magic. Earth Observation Magazine October 2001; pp. 33-35.
18. Lee, D.S.; Shan, J. Combining Lidar elevation data and IKONOS multispectral imagery for coastal classification mapping. Marine Geod. 2003, 26, 117.
19. Bork, E.W.; Su, J.G. Integrating LIDAR data and multispectral imagery for enhanced classification of rangeland vegetation: A meta analysis. Remote Sens. Environ. 2007, 111, 11-24.
20. Alonso, M.; Malpica, J. Classification of multispectral high-resolution satellite imagery using lidar elevation data. In Advances in Visual Computing; Bebis, G., Boyle, R., Parvin, B., Koracin, D., Remagnino, P., Porikli, F., Peters, J., Klosowski, J., Arns, L., Chun, Y., Rhyne, T.-M., Monroe, L., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; Volume 5359, pp. 85-94.
21. Rottensteiner, F.; Trinder, J.; Clode, S.; Kubik, K. Using the Dempster-Shafer method for the fusion of LIDAR data and multi-spectral images for building detection. Inform. Fusion 2005, 6, 283-300.
22. Charaniya, A.P.; Manduchi, R.; Lodha, S.K. Supervised Parametric Classification of Aerial LiDAR Data. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2004 Computer Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop, Baltimore, MD, USA, 27 June-2 July 2004; pp. 1-8.
23. Song, J.; Han, S.; Yu, K.; Kim, Y. Assessing the Possibility of Land-Cover Classification Using LIDAR Intensity Data. In Proceedings of ISPRS Commission III "Photogrammetric Computer Vision", Graz, Austria, 9-13 September 2002; In IAPRS, 2002; Volume 34, pp. 259-263.
24. Belward, A.S.; de Hoyos, A. A comparison of supervised maximum likelihood and decision tree classification for crop cover estimation from multitemporal LANDSAT MSS data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1987, 8, 229-235.
25. Jensen, J.R. Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective; Pearson Education, Inc.: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2005; pp. 1-526.
26. Hartfield, K. Analysis of New Classification Methods for Crop Type Mapping in Arizona. M.S. Thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA, 2010; Unpublished.
27. Johnson, D.M. A comparison of coincident Landsat-5 TM and Resourcesat-1 AWiFS imagery for classifying croplands. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 2008, 74, 1413-1423.
28. Brennan, R.; Webster, T.L. Object-oriented land cover classification of lidar-derived surfaces. Can. J. Remote Sens. 2006, 32, 162-172.
29. Data Mining Tools See5 and C5.0; RuleQuest Research: St Ives, NSW, Australia, 2011. Available online: http://www.rulequest.com/see5-info.html (accessed on 2 November 2011).
30. Homer, C.; Huang, C.; Yang, L.; Wylie, B.; Coan., M. Development of a 2001 National Landcover Database for the United States. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 2004, 70, 829-840.
31. Cohen, J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1960, 20, 37-46.
32. Congalton, R.G. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens. Environ. 1991, 37, 35-46.
33. Gatziolis, D. LiDAR Intensity Normalization in Rugged Forested Terrain. In Proceedings of Silvilaser 2009: The 9th International Conference on Lidar Applications for Assessing Forest Ecosystems, College Station, TX, USA, 14-16 October 2009; pp. 119-127.
34. Korpela, I.; Ørka, H.O.; Hyyppä, J.; Heikkinen, V.; Tokola, T. Range and AGC normalization in airborne discrete-return LiDAR intensity data for forest canopies. ISPRS J. Photogramm. 2010, 65, 369.
35. McNemar, Q. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 1947, 12, 153-157.
36. De Leeuw, J.; Jia, H.; Yang, L.; Liu, X.; Schmidt, K.; Skidmore, A.K. Comparing accuracy assessments to infer superiority of image classification methods. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2006, 27, 223-232.
37. Chen, J. Satellite Image Processing for Urban Land Cover Composition Analysis and Runoff Estimation. Ph.D. Thesis, The Department of Geography, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 1996; p. 54.
38. Yu, B.L.; Liu, H.X.; Wu, J.P.; Hu, Y.J.; Zhang, L. Automated derivation of urban building density information using airborne LiDAR data and object-based method. Landscape Urban Plan. 2010, 98, 210-219.