Gender structures in car availability in car deficient households

Research in Transportation Economics

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 16-26

  Scheiner, Joachim ^a   Holz Rau, Christian ^a  

^a TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Car availability; Car deficient households; Gender; Intra household car allocation; Time use

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856705468     PISSN: 07398859     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2011.12.006     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Aiken L.S., West SG. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions 1991, Sage, Newbury Park.
2. Anggraini R., Arentze T.A., Timmermans H.J.P. Car allocation between household heads in car deficient households: a decision model. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 2008, 8(4):301-319.
3. Bagley M.N., Mokhtarian P.L. The impact of residential neighborhood type on travel behavior: a structural equations modeling approach. Annals of Regional Science 2002, 36(2):279-297.
4. Bauer F., Groß H., Oliver G., Sieglen G., Smith M. Time use and work-life balance in Germany and the UK 2007, Anglo-German Foundation for the Study of Industrial Society, London.
5. Baxter J. Gender equality and participation in housework: a cross-national perspective. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 1997, 28(3):220-247.
6. Becker G.S. Atreatise on the family 1981, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
7. Bergstad C.J., Gamble A., Hagman O., Polk M., Gärling T., Olsson L.E. Affective-symbolic and instrumental-independence psychological motives mediating effects of socio-demographic variables on daily car use. Journal of Transport Geography 2011, 19(1):33-38.
8. Best H., Lanzendorf M. Division of labour and gender differences in metropolitan car use: an empirical study in Cologne, Germany. Journal of Transport Geography 2005, 13(2):109-121.
9. Bhat C.R., Guo J.Y. Acomprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels. Transportation Research B 2006, 41(5):506-526.
10. Blumen O. Gender differences in the journey to work. Urban Geography 1994, 15(3):223-245.
11. Bolt, V. J., Bird, K., 2003. The intrahousehold disadvantages framework: A framework for the analysis of intra-household difference and inequality. CPRC Working Paper No 32. Manchester: Chronic Poverty Research Centre.
12. Brennecke J. Alltagsmobilität Wiesbadener Frauen. Handbuch der kommunalen Verkehrsplanung. Kap. 2.2.1.3 1994, Wichmann, Heidelberg. T. Bracher (Ed.).
13. Buliung, R. N., 2005. Activity/travel behaviour research: Approaches and findings with identification of research themes and emerging methods. Working Paper Series, CSpA WP 008. Hamilton: Centre for Spatial Analysis.
14. Camstra R. Commuting and gender in a lifestyle perspective. Urban Studies 1996, 33(2):283-300.
15. Cao X., Mokhtarian P.L., Handy S.L. Cross-sectional and quasi-panel explorations of the connection between the built environment and auto ownership. Environment and Planning A 2007, 39(4):830-847.
16. Chlond B., Kuhnimhof T. Panelhandbuch. Das Deutsche Mobilitätspanel: Informationen sowie Anleitung und Anregungen zur Datennutzung 2005, Universität, Karlsruhe.
17. Choo, S. and Mokhtarian, P.L., 2002. The relationship of vehicle type choice to personality, lifestyle, attitudinal, and demographic variables. Report for the DaimlerChrysler Corporation. Davis, CA.
18. Clark W.A.V., Wang W.W. Job access and commute penalties: balancing work and residence in Los Angeles. Urban Geography 2005, 26(7):610-626.
19. Coulter P.B. Measuring inequality. A methodological handbook 1989, Westview Press, Boulder.
20. Crane R. Is there a quiet revolution in women's travel? Revisiting the gender gap in commuting. Journal of the American Planning Association 2007, 73(3):298-316.
21. Dargay J.M. Determinants of car ownership in rural and urban areas: a pseudo-panel analysis. Transportation Research E 2002, 38:351-366.
22. Dargay J., Hanly M. Volatility of car ownership, commuting mode and time in the UK. Transportation Research A 2007, 41(10):934-948.
23. Ettema D., Van der Lippe T. Weekly rhythms in task and time allocation of households. Transportation 2009, 36(2):113-129.
24. Forschungsgruppe Wahlen Wahlanalyse Rheinland-Pfalz 2011, 14.4.2011. http://www.forschungsgruppewahlen.de/Aktuelles/Wahl_Rheinland-Pfalz/.
25. Garson G.D. Generalized linear models and generalized estimating equations 2010, 31.03.2011. http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/gzlm_gee.htm.
26. Giuliano G. Getting there: women and transportation. The technological woman. Interfacing with tomorrow 1983, 102-112. Praeger, New York. J. Zimmermann (Ed.).
27. Golob T.F., Kim S., Ren W. How households use different types of vehicles: a structural driver allocation and usage model. Transportation Research A 1996, 30(2):103-118.
28. Golob T.F., McNally M.G. Amodel of activity participation and travel interactions between household heads. Transportation Research B 1997, 31(3):177-194.
29. Gordon P., Kumar A., Richard H.W. Gender differences in metropolitan travel behavior. Regional Studies 1989, 23(6):499-510.
30. Hakim C. Work-lifestyle choices in the 21st century: Preference theory 2000, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
31. Hanson S., Abnd Johnston I. Gender differences in work-trip length: explanations and implications. Urban Geography 1985, 6(3):193-219.
32. Hartmann H. Capitalism, patriarchy, and job segregation by sex. Capitalist patriarchy 1979, 206-247. Monthly Review Press, New York. Z.R. Eisenstein (Ed.).
33. Hedeker D., Gibbons R.D., Flay B.R. Random-effects regression models for clustered data with an example from smoking prevention research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1994, 62(4):757-765.
34. Heine H., Mautz R. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen des Autoverzichts. Die Wahldes Verkehrsmittels angesichts der Mobilitätszwänge und normativen Ansprüche der heutigen familiären Lebensweise 2001, Soziologisches Forschungsinstitut, Göttingen.
35. Hjorthol R. Daily mobility of men and women - a barometer of gender equality?. Gendered mobilities 2008, 193-210. Ashgate, Aldershot. T.P. Uteng, T. Cresswell (Eds.).
36. Holz-Rau H.-C. Bestimmungsgrößen des Verkehrsverhaltens 1990, Technische Universität, Berlin.
37. Kato H., Matsumoto M. Intra-household interaction in a nuclear family: a utility-maximizing approach. Transportation Research B 2009, 43(2):191-203.
38. Katz E. The intra-household economics of voice and exit. Feminist Economics 1997, 3(3):25-46.
39. Kézdi G. Robust standard error estimation in fixed-effects panel models. Hungarian statistical review, special 2004, Vol. 9:96-116.
40. Law R. Beyond 'women and transport': towards new geographies of gender and daily mobility. Progress in Human Geography 1999, 23(4):567-588.
41. Lerman S.T., Ben-Akiva M. Disaggregate behavioural model of automobile ownership. Transportation Research Record 1976, 569:34-51.
42. Mannering F., Winston C. Adynamic empirical analysis of household vehicle ownership and utilization. Rand Journal of Economics 1985, 16(2):215-236.
43. Manski C.F., Sherman L. An empirical analysis of household choice among motor vehicles. Transportation Research A 1980, 14(5-6):349-366.
44. Matthies E., Kuhn S., Klöckner C.A. Travel mode choice of women: the result of limitation, ecological norm or weak habit?. Environment and Behavior 2002, 34(2):163-177.
45. Mincer J. Family migration decisions. Journal of Political Economy 1978, 86(5):749-773.
46. Mohammadian A. Gender differences in automobile choice behavior. Technical Papers. Transportation research Board Conference Proceedings 35 2005, Vol. 2:41-48. National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Transportation Research Board (Ed.).
47. Nichols A., Schaffer M. Clustered errors in stata 2007, 18.01.2011. http://www.docstoc.com.
48. Noble B. Women's travel: can the circle be squared?. Technical Papers. Transportation research Board Conference Proceedings 35 2005, Vol. 2:196-209. National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Transportation Research Board (Ed.).
49. Özkan T., Lajunen T. What causes the differences in driving between young men and women? The effects of gender roles and sex on young drivers' driving behaviour and self-assessment of skills. Transportation Research F 2006, 9:269-277.
50. Petersen, E. and Vovsha, P., 2005. A framework for a joint mode choice-household car allocation model. Paper presented at the European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, 3-5 October 2005.
51. Petersen E., Vovsha P. Intrahousehold car-type choice for different travel needs. Transportation Research Record 1985 2006, 207-219.
52. Pickup L. Women's gender-role and its influence on travel behavior. Built Environment 1984, 10(1):61-68.
53. Polk M. The influence of gender on daily car use and on willingness to reduce car use in Sweden. Journal of Transport Geography 2004, 12(3):185-195.
54. Potoglou D., Kanaroglou P.S. Modelling car ownership in urban areas: a case study of Hamilton, Canada. Journal of Transport Geography 2008, 16(1):42-54.
55. Rogers W.H. Sg17: regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin 1993, 13:19-23.
56. Roorda M.J., Carrasco J.A., Miller E.J. An integrated model of vehicle transactions, activity scheduling and mode choice. Transportation Research B 2009, 43(2):217-229.
57. Roorda M.J., Mohammadian A., Miller E.J. Toronto area car ownership study: a retrospective interview and its applications. Transportation Research Record 2000, 1719:69-76.
58. Salomon I., Ben-Akiva M. The use of the life-style concept in travel demand models. Environment and Planning A 1983, 15(5):623-638.
59. Schad H., Funke C., Rommerskirchen S., Vödisch M. Konstanz und Variabilität des Mobilitätsverhaltens im Wochenverlauf 2001, Prognos, Basel.
60. Scheiner J. Does individualisation of travel behaviour exist? Determinants and determination of travel participation and mode choice in West Germany, 1976-2002. Die Erde 2006, 137(4):355-377.
61. Scheiner J. Objective and subjective socio-spatial inequalities in activity patterns. Swiss Journal of Sociology 2009, 35(3):525-549.
62. Scheiner J. Social inequalities in travel behaviour: trip distances in the context of residential self-selection and lifestyles. Journal of Transport Geography 2010, 18(6):679-690.
63. Scheiner J., Holz-Rau C. Travel mode choice: affected by objective or subjective determinants?. Transportation 2007, 34(4):487-511.
64. Schendera C. Regressions analyse mit SPSS 2008, Oldenbourg, München.
65. Schwanen T. Gender differences in chauffeuring children among dual-earner families. The Professional Geographer 2007, 59(4):447-462.
66. Scott D.M., Kanaroglou P.S. An activity-episode generation model that captures interactions between household heads: development and empirical analysis. Transportation Research B 2002, 36(10):875-896.
67. Simma A., Axhausen K.W. Structures of commitment in mode use: a comparison of Switzerland, Germany and Great Britain. Transport Policy 2001, 8(4):279-288.
68. Srinivasan K.K., Athuru S.R. Analysis of within-household effects and between-household differences in maintenance activity allocation. Transportation 2005, 32(5):495-521.
69. Alltag in Deutschland. Analysen zur Zeitverwendung 2004, Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden. Statistisches Bundesamt (Ed.).
70. Turner T., Niemeier D. Travel to work and household responsibility: new evidence. Transportation 1997, 24(4):397-419.
71. Van Acker V., Witlox F. Car ownership as a mediating variable in car travel behaviour research using a structural equation modelling approach to identify its dual relationship. Journal of Transport Geography 2010, 18(1):65-74.
72. Vance C., Buchheim S., Brockfeld E. Gender as a determinant of car use: evidence from Germany. Technical papers. Transportation research board conference proceedings 35 2005, Vol. 2:59-67. National Research Council, Washington, DC. Transportation Research Board (Ed.).
73. Walby S. Theorizing patriarchy 1990, Blackwell, London.
74. Wen C.-H., Koppelman F.S. Aconceptual and methodological framework for the generation of activity-travel patterns. Transportation 2000, 27(1):5-23.
75. West S.E. Distributional effects of alternative vehicle pollution control policies. Journal of Public Economics 2004, 88(3):735-757.
76. Wooldridge J.M. Cluster-sample methods in applied econometrics. The American Economic Review 2003, 93(2):133-138.