It's all in the name, or is it? the impact of labeling on health state values

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 31-40

  Rowen, Donna ^a   Brazier, John ^a   Tsuchiya, Aki ^a,b   Young, Tracey ^a   Ibbotson, Rachel ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cancer; preference based measures; QALY; utility, labelling

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84856607845     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X11408435     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997 ; 35 (11). 1095-108 (Pubitemid 127453463)
2. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. London: NICE ; 2008 :
3. Marra CA, Woolcott JC, Kopec JA, et al. A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Soc Sci Med. 2005 ; 60 (7). 1571-82 (Pubitemid 40126441)
4. Espallargues M, Czoski-Murray CJ, Bansback NJ, et al. The impact of age-related macular degeneration on health status utility values. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 ; 46 (11). 4016-23 (Pubitemid 44264600)
5. Barton GR, Bankart J, Davis AC, Summerfield QA. Comparing utility scores before and after hearing-aid provision: results according to the EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D. Appl Health Econ Health Pol. 2004 ; 3 (2). 103-5 (Pubitemid 41018308)
6. Yang Y, Brazier J, Tsuchiya A, Young T. Estimating a preference-based index for a 5-dimensional health state classification for asthma derived from the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Med Decis Making. 2011 ; 31 (2). 281-91
7. Young T, Yang Y, Brazier J, Tsuchiya A. The use of Rasch analysis in reducing a large condition-specific instrument for preference valuation: the case of moving from AQLQ to AQL-5D. Med Decis Making. 2011 ; 31 (1). 195-210
8. Gerard K, Dobson M, Hall J. Framing and labelling effects in health descriptions: quality adjusted life years for treatment of breast cancer. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 ; 46 (1). 77-84 (Pubitemid 23084434)
9. Llewellyn-Thomas H, Sutherland HJ, Tibshirani R, Ciampi A, Till JE, Boyd NF. Describing health states. Methodologic issues in obtaining values for health states. Med Care. 1984 ; 22 (6). 543-52 (Pubitemid 14116154)
10. Rabin R, Rosser RM, Butler C. Impact of diagnosis on utilities assigned to states of illness. J R Soc Med. 1993 ; 86 (8). 444-8 (Pubitemid 23226041)
11. Robinson S, Bryan S. "Naming and framing": an investigation of the effect of disease labels on health state valuations. Paper presented at the Health Economics Study Group Meeting ; University of Oxford, Oxford, UK ;.
12. Sackett DL, Torrance GW. The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public. J Chronic Dis. 1978 ; 31 (11). 697-704
13. Rowen D, Brazier J, Young T, et al. Deriving a preference-based measure for cancer using the EORTC QLQ-C30. Value Health. :
14. McCabe C, Stevens K, Roberts J, Brazier J. Health state values for the HUI 2 descriptive system: results from a UK survey. Health Econ. 2005 ; 14 (3). 231-44 (Pubitemid 40360760)
15. Yang Y, Brazier J, Tsuchiya A, Coyne K. Estimating a preference-based single index from the overactive bladder questionnaire. Value Health. 2009 ; 12 (1). 159-66
16. Goldstein H Multilevel Statistical Methods. New York, NY: Halstead ; 1995 :
17. Kind P, Hardman G, Macran S UK Population Norms for EQ-5D. Centre for Health Economics Discussion Paper Series. York, UK: University of York ; 1999 :
18. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon ; 2001 :
19. Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science. 1987 ; 236: 280-5 (Pubitemid 17061043)
20. Tsevat J. What do utilities measure?. Med Care. 2000 ; 38 (9, suppl II). II-160 - II-164
21. Dolan P, Kahneman D. Interpretations of utilities and their implications for the valuation of health. Econ J. 2008 ; 118: 215-34