Anthropometric measurements to design best-fit femoral stem for the Indian population

Indian Journal of Orthopaedics

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 46-53

  Rawal, B R ^a   Ribeiro, Rahul ^a   Malhotra, Rajesh ^b   Bhatnagar, Naresh ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI   (India)

^b ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

Cementless femoral stem; Implant design; Implant patient match; Indian population

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856591748     PISSN: 00195413     EISSN: 19983727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.91634     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Amstutz HC. Complications of total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1970;72:123-37
2. Gomez PF, Morcuende JA. Early attempts at hip arthroplasty- -1700s to 1950s. Iowa Orthop J 2005;25:25-9
3. Granger C, Schutte HD, Bigger SB, Kennedy JM, Latour RA. Failure analysis of composite femoral component for hip arthoplasty. J Rehab Res Develop 2003;40:131-46
4. Engh CA. Hip arthroplasty with a Moore prosthesis with porous coating: A five year study. Clin Orthop 1983;176:52-66 (Pubitemid 13068407)
5. Husmann O, Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, de Roguin B, Argenson JN. Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty 1987;12:444-50
6. Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH. Porous-coated hip replacement: The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg 1987;69:45-55 (Pubitemid 17098507)
7. Morscher E. Cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1983;181:76-91 (Pubitemid 14215203)
8. Jasty M, Henshaw PM, O'Connor DO. Strain alterations in the proximal femur with an uncemented femoral prosthesis emphasizing the effect of component fix. Atlanta, GA: Proc Orthopaedic Research Society meeting; 1988. p. 335
9. Najjar EI, McWilliams ER. Forensic anthropology: The structure, Morphology and variations of human bone and dentition, Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas; 1978
10. Ericksen MF. Ageing changes in the medullary cavity of the proximal femur in American black and whites. Am J Phys Anthropol 1979;51:563-9 (Pubitemid 10158862)
11. Nurzenski MK, Briffa NK, Price RI, Khoo BC, Devine A, Beck TJ, et al. Geometric indices of bone strength are associated with physical activity and dietary calcium intake in healthy older women. J Bone Miner Res 2007;22:416-24 (Pubitemid 46797125)
12. Siwach RC, Dahiya S. Anthropometric study of proximal femur geometry and its clinical application. Indian J Orthop 2003;37:247-51
13. Reddy VS, Moorthy GV, Reddy SG. Do we need a special design of femoral component of total hip prosthesis in our patients? Indian J Orthop 1999;33:282-4
14. Leung K, Procter P, Robioneck B, Behrens K. Geometric mismatch of the gamma nail to the Chinese femur. Clin Orthop 1996;323:42-8 (Pubitemid 26065422)
15. Leung KS. Early experience with gamma nails in the treatment of peritrochanteric fractures. Trans Hong Kong Orthop Assoc 1989;33. Available from: http://www.ijoonline.com/text.asp? [Last accessed on 2011 Apr 20]
16. Leung KS, So WS, Shen WY, Hui PW. Gamma nails and dynamic hip screws for peritrochanteric fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 1992;74:345-51
17. Yoshioka Y, Siu D, Cooke TD. The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69:873-80 (Pubitemid 17162610)
18. Maruyama M, Feinberg JR, Capello WN, D'Antonio JA. Morphological features of the acetabulum and femur, anteversion angle and implant positioning. Clin Ortho Rel Res 2001;393:52-65 (Pubitemid 33101697)
19. Vaidya SV, Ranawat CS, Aroojis A, Laud NS. Anthropometric measurements to design total knee prostheses for the Indian Population. J Arthroplast 2000;15:79-85 (Pubitemid 30053524)
20. Available from: http://hipsandknees.com/hip/hipimplants.htm [Last cited on 2011 May 11]
21. Khang G, Choi K, Kim C, Yang J, Bae T. A study of Korean femoral geometry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;406:116-22 (Pubitemid 36083889)
22. Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, Aubagniac JM. The morphology of the proximal femur: A three-dimensional radiographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg 1992;74:28-32
23. Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, Heegaard JH. Radiological variations in the anatomical parameters of the proximal femur in relation to rotation. Fr J Orthop Surg 1989;3:121
24. Mahaisavariya B, Sitthiseripratip K, Tongdee T, Bohez EL, Sloten JV, Oris P. Morphological study of the proximal femur: A new method of geometrical assessment using 3-dimensional reverse engineering. Med Engg Phys 2002;24:617-22
25. Weiner DS, Cook AJ, Hoyt WA, Oravec CE. Computed tomography in the measurement of femoral anteversion. Orthopedics 1987;1:299-306
26. Luo W, Stanhope SJ, Sheehan FT. Using two palpable measurements improves the subject-specific femoral modeling. J Biomech 2009;42:2000-5
27. Noble PC, Jerry W, Alexander JW, Lindhal LJ, Yew DT, Granberry WM, et al. The anatomical basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop 1988;235:148-65
28. Byung WN, Kwang SS, Ki CB, Chul HC, Chul HK, Shin YK. The effect of stem alignment on results of total hip arthroplasty with a cementless tapered-wedge femoral component. J Arthroplast 2008;23:418-23
29. Hoaglund FT, Low WD. Anatomy of the femoral neck and head with comparative data Caucasians and Hong Kong Chinese. Clin Orthop 1980;152:10
30. Ries MD, Suzuki Y, Renowitzky G, Lotz JC, Barrack RL, Bourne RB, et al. Effect of cementless bowed stem distal surface contour and coronal slot on femoral bone strains and torsional stability. J Arthroplasty 2003;18:494-8 (Pubitemid 36750122)
31. Fessy MH, Seutin B, Bdjui J. Anatomical basis for the choice of the femoral implant in the total hip arthroplasty. Surg Radiol Anat 1997;19:283-6 (Pubitemid 27491378)
32. Hua J, Walker PS. Closeness of fit of uncemented stems improves the strain distribution in the femur. J Orthop Res 1995;13:339-46
33. Ducheyne P, Aernoudt E, Meester PD, Martens M, Mulier JC, Leeuwen DV. Factors governing the mechanical behavior of the implant-porous coating-trabecular bone interface. J Biomech 2004;19:658-60
34. Fuku H. Cementless hip prosthesis design: A basic study and analysis of the proximal femur in normal Japanese people. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 1994;68:763-73 (Pubitemid 24327376)
35. Sugano N, Noble PC, Kamaric E. Predicting the position of the femoral head center. J Arthroplasty 1999;14:102-7 (Pubitemid 29042752)
36. Ranawat CS, Rodriguez JA. Functional leg-lenth inequality following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1997;12:359-64 (Pubitemid 29023757)
37. Maheshwari AV, Zlowodzki MP, Siram G, Jain AK. Femoral neck anteversion, acetabular anteversion and combined anteversion in the normal Indian adult population: A computed tomographic study. Indian J Orthop 2010;44:277-82
38. Jain AK, Maheshwari AV, Nath S, Singh MP, Nagar M. Anteversion of the femoral neck in Indian dry femora. J Orthop Sci 2003;8:334-40 (Pubitemid 36702082)