The blockbuster hypothesis: Influencing the boundaries of knowledge

Scientometrics

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 959-982

  Brouthers, Keith D ^a   Mudambi, Ram ^b   Reeb, David M ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic journal quality; High impact knowledge; Knowledge creation; Knowledge gatekeepers

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856553549     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0540-5     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Acs, Z., Anselin, L., & Varga, A. (2002). Patent counts and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy, 31(7), 1069-1085.
2. Agarwal, A., & Henderson, R. (2002). Putting citations in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48, 44-60.
3. Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
4. Colquitt, J. A., & Zapata-Phelan, C. (2007). Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five decade study of the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1281-1303.
5. Dahlin, K., & Behrens, D. (2005). When is an invention really radical? Defining and measuring technological radicalness. Research Policy, 34, 717-738.
6. Dunlap-Hinkler, D., Kotabe, M., & Mudambi, R. (2010). A story of breakthrough vs. incremental innovation: Corporate entrepreneurship in the global pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(2), 106-127.
7. Gittelman, M., & Kogut, B. (2003). Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Science, 49(4), 366-382.
8. Gleeson, R., & Schlossman, S. (1992). The many faces of the new look; The University of Virginia, Carnegie Tech, and the reform of American management education in the postwar era. Selections, Spring, 1-24.
9. Hall, B., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics, 36, 16-38.
10. Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 716-749.
11. Henderson, R., & Clark, K. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9-30.
12. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: A reassessment: Comment. American Economic Review, 95, 461-464.
13. Jovanovic, B. (1979). Job matching and the theory of turnover. Journal of Political Economy, 87(5), 972-990.
14. Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
15. Kochen, M., Crickman, R., & Blaivas, A. (1981). Distribution of scientific experts as recognized by peer consensus. Scientometrics, 4(1), 45-56.
16. Liebeskind, J. P. (1996). Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 93-107.
17. March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71-87.
18. McFadyen, M., & Cannella, A. (2004). Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 735-746.
19. Mudambi, R. (2008). Location, control and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(5), 699-725.
20. Mudambi, R., & Swift, T. (2011). Proactive knowledge management and firm growth: A punctuated equilibrium model. Research Policy, 40(3), 429-440.
21. Narin, F., & Noma, E. (1985). Is technology becoming science? Scientometrics, 7(3-6), 369-381.
22. Pfeffer, J., & Moore, W. (1980). Power in university budgeting: A replication and extension. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 637-653.
23. Podsakoff, P., Mackenzie, S., Bachrach, D., & Podsakoff, N. (2005). The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 473-488.
24. Schlossman, S., Sedlak, M., & Wechsler, H. (1987). The new look; The Ford foundation and revolution in business education. Selections, Winter, 8-28.
25. Schultz, D. M. (2010). Are three heads better than two? How the number of reviewers and editor behavior affect the rejection rate. Scientometrics, 84(2), 277-292.
26. Seglen, P. O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(9), 628-638.
27. Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314(7079), 498-502.
28. Smith, K., Collins, C., & Clark, K. (2005). Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 346-357.
29. Starbuck, W. (2005). The statistics of academic publication. Organization Science, 16, 180-200.
30. Trieschmann, J., Dennis, A., Northcraft, G., & Neimi, A. (2000). Serving multiple constituencies in business schools: MBA program versus research performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1130-1141.
31. Upham, S. P., & Small, H. (2010). Emerging research fronts in science and technology: Patterns of new knowledge development. Scientometrics, 83(1), 15-38.
32. Zack, M. H. (1999). Managing codified knowledge. Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 45-58.