Epithelial machines that shape the embryo

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 82-87

  Davidson, Lance A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASCIDIACEA; CELL FUNCTION; DROSOPHILA; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYONAL TISSUE; EPITHELIUM; FORCE; GASTRULATION; HUMAN; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; MORPHOGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; EPITHELIAL CELLS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ASCIDIA; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

EID: 84856539539     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.10.005     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Koehl M.A.R. Biomechanical approaches to morphogenesis. Semin. Dev. Biol. 1990, 1:367-378.
2. Davidson L.A. Embryo mechanics: balancing force production with elastic resistance during morphogenesis. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2011, 95:215-241.
3. Gibson L.J., et al. Cellular Materials in Nature and Medicine 2010, Cambridge University Press.
4. Trinkaus J.P. Cells into Organs: The Forces That Shape the Embryo 1984, Prentice-Hall.
5. Fristrom D. The cellular basis of epithelial morphogenesis. A review. Tissue Cell 1988, 20:645-690.
6. Sawyer J.M, et al. Apical constriction: a cell shape change that can drive morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 2010, 341:5-19.
7. Lecuit T., Lenne P.F. Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8:633-644.
8. Gorfinkiel N., Blanchard G.B. Dynamics of actomyosin contractile activity during epithelial morphogenesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2011, 23:531-539.
9. Zhang H., et al. Tissue morphogenesis: how multiple cells cooperate to generate a tissue. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2010, 22:575-582.
10. Kasza K.E., Zallen J.A. Dynamics and regulation of contractile actin-myosin networks in morphogenesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2011, 23:30-38.
11. Lye C.M., Sanson B. Tension and epithelial morphogenesis in Drosophila early embryos. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2011, 95:145-187.
12. Lecuit T., et al. Force generation, transmission, and integration suring cell and tissue morphogenesis. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 27:157-184.
13. Sawyer J.K., et al. The Drosophila afadin homologue Canoe regulates linkage of the actin cytoskeleton to adherens junctions during apical constriction. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 186:57-73.
14. Harris T.J., Peifer M. The positioning and segregation of apical cues during epithelial polarity establishment in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 170:813-823.
15. Kolsch V., et al. Control of Drosophila gastrulation by apical localization of adherens junctions and RhoGEF2. Science 2007, 315:384-386.
16. Martin A.C., et al. Integration of contractile forces during tissue invagination. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 188:735-749.
17. Martin A.C., et al. Pulsed contractions of an actin-myosin network drive apical constriction. Nature 2009, 457:495-499.
18. Sweeton D., et al. Gastrulation in Drosophila: the formation of the ventral furrow and posterior midgut invaginations. Development 1991, 112:775-789.
19. McMahon A., et al. Dynamic analyses of Drosophila gastrulation provide insights into collective cell migration. Science 2008, 322:1546-1550.
20. Supatto W., et al. Quantitative imaging of collective cell migration during Drosophila gastrulation: multiphoton microscopy and computational analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4:1397-1412.
21. Odell G.M., et al. The mechanical basis of morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 1981, 85:446-462.
22. Brodland G.W., et al. Video force microscopy reveals the mechanics of ventral furrow invagination in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:22111-22116.
23. Munro E.M., Odell G.M. Polarized basolateral cell motility underlies invagination and convergent extension of the ascidian notochord. Development 2002, 129:13-24.
24. Munro E.M., Odell G. Morphogenetic pattern formation during ascidian notochord formation is regulative and highly robust. Development 2002, 129:1-12.
25. Sherrard K., et al. Sequential activation of apical and basolateral contractility drives ascidian endoderm invagination. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:1499-1510.
26. Blanchard G.B., et al. Tissue tectonics: morphogenetic strain rates, cell shape change and intercalation. Nat. Methods 2009, 6:458-464.
27. Trepat X., et al. Physical forces during collective cell migration. Nat. Phys. 2009, 5:426-430.
28. Saez A., et al. Is the mechanical activity of epithelial cells controlled by deformations or forces?. Biophys. J. 2005, 89:L52-L54.
29. Zhou J., et al. Macroscopic stiffening of embryonic tissues via microtubules, Rho-GEF, and assembly of contractile bundles of actomyosin. Development 2010, 137:2785-2794.
30. Fernandez-Gonzalez R., et al. Myosin II dynamics are regulated by tension in intercalating cells. Dev. Cell 2009, 17:736-743.
31. Pouille P.A., et al. Mechanical signals trigger Myosin II redistribution and mesoderm invagination in Drosophila embryos. Sci. Signal. 2009, 2:ra16.
32. Farge E. Mechanical induction of Twist in the Drosophila foregut/stomodeal primordium. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13:1365-1377.
33. Von Dassow M., et al. Surprisingly simple mechanical behavior from a complex embryonic tissue. PLoS ONE 2011, 5:e15359.
34. Eiraku M., et al. Self-organizing optic-cup morphogenesis in three-dimensional culture. Nature 2011, 472:51-56.
35. Green J.B., et al. Self-organization of vertebrate mesoderm based on simple boundary conditions. Dev. Dyn. 2004, 231:576-581.
36. Kim H.Y., Davidson L.A. Punctuated actin contractions during convergent extension and their permissive regulation by the non-canonical Wnt-signaling pathway. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124:635-646.