A pilot study to compare the views of traditionally trained and CAM-trained therapists using the clinical exemplar of the management of neck/upper limb pain to assess barriers to effective integration of approaches

Complementary Therapies in Medicine

Volumn 20, Issue 1-2, 2012, Pages 38-44

  Denyer, Karen ^a   Smith, Helen ^b   Davies, Kevin ^b   Horne, Rob ^c   Hankins, Matthew ^d   Walker Bone, Karen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b BRIGHTON AND SUSSEX MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Acupuncture; CAM; Chiropractic; Healthcare professional; Osteopathy

Indexed keywords

ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT; ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT; PARACETAMOL; STEROID;

ACUPUNCTURE; ACUPUNCTURIST; ADULT; ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; ARM PAIN; AROMATHERAPY; ARTICLE; BELIEFS ABOUT RISKS AND BENFITS OF TREATMENT QUESTIONNAIRE; CHINESE MEDICINE; CHIROPRACTIC; CHIROPRACTOR; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH BELIEF; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HERBAL MEDICINE; HOMEOPATHY; HUMAN; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; LIMB PAIN; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; NECK PAIN; NORMAL HUMAN; OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE; PARAMEDICAL PERSONNEL; PHARMACIST ATTITUDE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PHYSIOTHERAPIST ATTITUDE; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PILOT STUDY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; REFLEXOLOGY; REIKI; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SHOULDER PAIN; TRADITIONAL MEDICINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM;

ACUPUNCTURE; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHIROPRACTIC; COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH OCCUPATIONS; HUMANS; INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE; MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; NECK; NECK PAIN; OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE; PAIN MANAGEMENT; PHARMACY; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PILOT PROJECTS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84856527673     PISSN: 09652299     EISSN: 18736963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2011.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Thomas K.J. Coleman P. use of complementary or alternative medicine in a general population in Great Britain. Results from the National omnibus Survey. J Public Health 2004, 26:152-157.
2. Thomas K.J., Nichol J.P., Coleman P. Use and expenditure on complementary medicine in England: a population based survey. Complement Ther Med 2001, 9:2-11.
3. Bishop F.L., Yardley L., Lewith G.T. A systematic review of beliefs involved in the use of complementary and alternative medicine. J Health Psychol 2007, 2:851-867.
4. Moore A.D., Petri M.A., Manzi S., Isenberg D.A., Gordon C., Senécal J.L., et al. The use of alternative medical therapies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2000, 43:1410-1418.
5. Pioro-Boisset M., Esdaile J.M., Fitzcharles M. Alternative medicine use in fibromyalgia syndrome. Arthritis Care Res 1996, 9:1-4.
6. Jordan K.M., Sawyer A., Coakley P., Smith H.E., Cooper C., Arden N.K. The use of conventional and complementary treatments for knee osteoarthritis in the community. Rheumatology 2004, 43:381-384.
7. Lewith G., Robinson N. Complementary and alternative medicine: what the public want and how it may be delivered safely and effectively. J R Soc Med 2009, 102:411-414.
8. Morgan D., Glanville H., Mars S., Nathanson V. Education and training in complementary and alternative medicine: a postal survey of UK universities, medical schools and faculties of nurse education. Complement Ther Med 1998, 6:64-70.
9. Ernst E., Resch K., White A.R. Complementary medicine: what physicians think of it: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 1995, 155:1405-1409.
10. Arthritis Research Campaign Complementary and alternative medicines for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia 2009, Arthritis Research Campaign, London.
11. House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology. 6th report, Session 1999-2000. Complementary and Alternative Medicine; 2000. Report No.: 6.
12. Horne R. Benefits and risks of treatment evaluation [Personal communication].
13. Horne R., Weinman J., Barber N., Elliott R.A., Morgan M. Concordance, adherence and compliance in medicine taking: a conceptual map and research priorities 2005, National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D, London.
14. Walker-Bone K., Reading I., Coggon D., Cooper C., Palmer K. The anatomical pattern and determinants of pain in the neck and upper limbs: an epidemiologic study. Pain 2004, 109:45-51.
15. Weiner D.K., Ernst E. Complementary and alternative approaches to the treatment of persistent musculoskeletal pain. Clin J Pain 2004, 20:244-255.
16. Sran M.M., Khan K.M. Physiotherapy and osteoporosis: practice behaviours and clinicians' perceptions - a survey. Manual Ther 2005, 10:21-27.
17. Solomon D., Connelly M.T., Rosen C.J., Dawson-Hughes B., Kiel D.P., Greenspan S.L., et al. Factors related to the use of bone densitometry: survey responses of 494 primary care physicians in New England. Osteoporosis Int 2003, 14:123-129.
18. Rashidian A., van der Meulen J., Russell I. Differences in the contents of two randomised surveys of GPs' prescribing intentions affected response rates. J Clin Epidemiol 2008, 61:718-721.
19. Horne R., Weinman J., Hankins M. The Beliefs about Medicines questionnaire. The development and evaluation of a new method for assessing the cognitive representation of medication. Psychol Health 1999, 14:1-24.
20. Clatworthy J., Bowskill R., Parham R., Rank T., Scott J., Horne R. Understanding medication non-adherence in bipolar disorders using a Necessity-Concerns Framework. J Affect Disord 2009, 116(1-2):51-55.
21. Clatworthy J., Price D., Ryan D., Haughney Bucks R.S., Hawkins K., Skinner T.C., et al. Adherence to treatment in adolescents with cystic fibrosis: the role of illness perceptions and treatment beliefs. J Pediatr Psychol 2009, 34(September (8)):893-902.
22. Butler J.A., Peveler R.C., Roderick P., Smith P.W.F., Horne R., Mason J.C. Modifiable risk factors for non-adherence to immunosuppressants in renal transplant recipients: a cross sectional study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004, 19(12):3144-3149.