Differences in the contents of two randomized surveys of GPs' prescribing intentions affected response rates

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 61, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 718-721

  Rashidian, Arash ^a,b   van der Meulen, Jan ^b,c   Russell, Ian ^d  

^a TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^d BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

General practice; Prescribing; Questionnaire study; Response bias; Response rate; Survey

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COENZYME A REDUCTASE INHIBITOR;

ARTICLE; ASTHMA; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PRESCRIPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESPONSE VARIABLE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); GREAT BRITAIN; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; INTENTION; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; PRESCRIPTIONS, DRUG;

EID: 44649090059     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.019     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Cartwright A. Professionals as responders: variations in and effects of response rates to questionnaires, 1961-1977. BMJ ii (1978) 1419-1421
2. McAvoy B.R., and Kaner E.F.S. General practice postal surveys: a questionnaire too far?. BMJ 313 (1996) 732-733
3. Templeton L., Deehan A., Taylor C., Drummond C., and Strang J. Surveying general practitioners: does a low response rate matter?. Br J Gen Pract 47 (1997) 91-94
4. Young J. Mail surveys of general practice physicians: response rates and non-response bias. Swiss Med Wkly 135 (2005) 187-188
5. Sales A.E., Plomondon M.E., Magid D.J., Spertus J.A., and Rumsfeld J.S. Assessing response bias from missing quality of life data: the Heckman method. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2 49 (2004) 10.1186/1477-7525-2-49
6. Stocks N., and Gunnell D. What are the characteristics of general practitioners who routinely do not return postal questionnaires: a cross sectional study. J Epidemiol Community Health 54 (2000) 940-941
7. Kaner E.F., Haighton C.A., and McAvoy B.R. 'So much post, so busy with practice-so, no time!': a telephone survey of general practitioners' reasons for not participating in postal questionnaire surveys. Br J Gen Pract 48 (1998) 1067-1069
8. Sibbald B., Addington-Hall J., Brenneman D., and Freeling P. Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations. Br J Gen Pract 44 (1994) 297-300
9. Barclay S., Todd C., Finlay I., Grande G., and Wyatt P. Not another questionnaire! Maximizing the response rate, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs. Fam Pract 19 (2002) 105-111
10. Jepson C., Asch D.A., Hershey J.C., and Ubel P.A. In a mailed physician survey, questionnaire length had a threshold effect on response rate. J Clin Epidemiol 58 (2005) 103-105
11. Rashidian A., Eccles M.P., and Russell I. Falling on stony ground? A qualitative study of implementation of clinical guidelines prescribing recommendations in primary care. Health Policy 86 (2008) 148-161
12. Rashidian A., Miles J., Russell D., and Russell I. Sample size for regression analyses of theory of planned behaviour studies: case of prescribing in general practice. Br J Health Psychol 11 (2006) 581-593
13. Edwards P., Roberts I., Clarke M., DiGuiseppi C., Pratap S., Wentz R., and Kwan I. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 324 (2002) 1183-1185
14. Thomson C.E., Paterson-Brown S., Russell D., McCaldin D., and Russell I.T. Encouraging GPs to complete postal questionnaires-one big prize or many small prizes? A randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract 21 (2004) 697-698
15. Leung G.M., Ho L.M., Chan M.F., Johnston J.M., and Wong F.K. The effects of cash and lottery incentives on mailed surveys to physicians: a randomized trial. J Clin Epidemiol 55 (2002) 801-807
16. McColl E., Jacoby A., Thomas A., Soutter J., Bamford C., Steen N., et al. Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health Technol Assess 5 31 (2001)
17. Majeed A., Evans N., and Head P. What can PACT data tell us about prescribing in general practice?. BMJ 315 (1997) 1515-1519
18. Montori V.M., Leung T.W., Walter S.D., and Guyatt G.H. Procedures that assess inconsistency in meta-analyses can assess the likelihood of response bias in multiwave surveys. J Clin Epidemiol 58 (2005) 856-858
19. Cull W.L., O'Connor K.G., Sharp S., and Tang S.S. Response rates and response bias for 50 surveys of pediatricians. Health Serv Res 40 (2005) 213-226