Molecular differentiation of Chenopodium album complex and some related species using ISSR profiles and ITS sequences

Gene

Volumn 495, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 29-35

  Rana, Tikam Singh ^a   Narzary, Diganta ^a,b   Ohri, Deepak ^a,c  

^a CSIR NATIONAL BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

^b Department of Botany   (India)

^c AMITY UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Chenopodium album complex; ISSR; ITS; Molecular differentiation

Indexed keywords

INTERNAL TRANSCRIBED SPACER 1; INTERNAL TRANSCRIBED SPACER 2;

ARTICLE; CHENOPODIUM; CHENOPODIUM ALBUM; CHENOPODIUM GIGANTEUM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTYPE; GENE LOCUS; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; INTER SIMPLE SEQUENCE REPEAT; KARYOTYPE; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PLANT GENE; PLANT GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BASE SEQUENCE; CHENOPODIUM ALBUM; GENETIC VARIATION; KARYOTYPE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

CHENOPODIUM ALBUM;

EID: 84856429383     PISSN: 03781119     EISSN: 18790038     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2011.12.031     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Allan G.J., Porter J.M. Tribal delimitation and phylogenetic relationships of Loteae and Coronilleae (Faboideae: Fabaceae) with special reference to Lotus: evidence from nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences. Am. J. Bot. 2000, 87:1871-1881.
2. APG III An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2009, 161(3):105-121.
3. Bera B., Mukherjee K.K. Morphological studies on three cytotypes of Chenopodium album L. Nucleus 1993, 43:93-103.
4. Baldwin B.G. Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: an example from the compositaogy. Mol. Phylo. Evol. 1992, 1(1):3-16.
5. Baldwin B.G., Sanderson M.J., Porter J.M., Wojciechowski M.F., Campbell C.S., Donoghue M.J. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Ann. Miss. Bot. Gar. 1995, 82:247-277.
6. Bhargava A., Rana T.S., Shukla S., Ohri D. Seed protein electrophoresis of some cultivated and wild species of Chenopodium. Biol. Plant. 2005, 49:505-511.
7. Bhargava A., Shukla S., Ohri D. Karyotypic studies on some cultivated and wild species of Chenopodium (Chenopodiaceae). Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 2006, 53:1309-1320.
8. Bhargava A., Shukla S., Ohri D. Evaluation of foliage yield and leaf quality traits in Chenopodium spp. In multiyear trials. Euphytica 2007, 153:199-213.
9. Bhargava A., Shukla S., Ohri D. Genome size variation in some cultivated and wild species of Chenopodium (Chenopodiaceae). Caryologia 2007, 60:245-250.
10. Bhargava A., Shukla S., Srivastava J., Singh N., Ohri D. Genetic diversity for mineral accumulation in the foliage of Chenopodium spp. Sci. Hortic. 2008, 118:338-346.
11. Botstein D., White R.L., Skolnick M., Davis R.W. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphism. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1980, 32:314-331.
12. Cole M.J. Interspecific relationships and interspecific variation of C. album L. in Britain. II. The chromosome numbers of Chenopodium album and other species. Watsonia 1962, 5:117-122.
13. Doyle J.J., Doyle J.L. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 1990, 12:13-15.
14. Gangopadhyay G., Das S., Mukherjee K.K. Speciation in Chenopodium in West Bengal, India. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 2002, 49:503-510.
15. Giusti L. El genero Chenopodium en Argentina: I. Numeros de cromosomas. Darwiniana 1970, 16:98-105.
16. Gupta M., Chyi Y.S., Romero-Severson J., Owen J.L. Amplification of DNA markers from evolutionary diverse genomes using single primers of simple sequence repeats. Theor. App. Gen. 1994, 89:998-1006.
17. Hershkovitz M.A., Zimmer E.A. On the evolutionary origins of the cacti. Taxon 1997, 46:217-232.
18. Kolano B., Siwinska D., Maluszynska J. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of genome structure in Chenopodium complex. Variability Evol. New Perspect. 2006, 72:507-517.
19. Kolano B., Siwinska D., Maluszynska J. Comparative cytogenetic analysis of diploid and hexaploid Chenopodium album agg. Acta Soc. Bot. Polonie 2008, 77:293-298.
20. Mehra P.N., Malik C.P. Cytology of some Indian Chenopodiaceae. Caryologia 1963, 16:67-84.
21. Mukherjee K.K. A comparative study of two cytotypes of Chenopodium album in West Bengal, India. Can. J. Bot. 1986, 64:754-759.
22. Page R.D.M. TreeView Win32 ver. 1.6.5. distributed by author available from. http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/treeview.html.
23. Pal M., Shukla S. A hexaploid grain chenopod from eastern Himalayas. Newslett. Himalayan Bot. 1990, 8:12-14.
24. Partap T., Joshi B.D., Galwey N.W. Chenopods: Chenopodium spp. Promoting the Conservation and use of Underutilized and Neglected Crops 1998, Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben/International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy.
25. Pavlicek A., Hrda S., Flegr J. FreeTree - Freeware program for construction of phylogenetic trees on the basis of distance data and bootstrapping/jackknife analysis of the tree robustness. Application in the RAPD analysis of the genus Frenkelia. Folia Biologica (Praha.) 1999, 45:97-99. http://www.natur.cuni.cz/~flegr/programs/freetree.htm.
26. Rahiminejad M.R., Gornall R.J. Flavonoid evidence for allopolyploidy in the Chenopodium album aggregate (Amaranthaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 2004, 246:77-87.
27. Rana T.S., Narzary D., Ohri D. Genetic diversity and relationships among some wild and cultivated species of Chenopodium L. Amaranthaceae using RAPD and DAMD methods. Curr. Sci. 2010, 98:840-846.
28. Ruas P.M., Bonifacio A., Ruas C.F., Fairbanks D.J., Anderson W.R. Genetic relationships among 19 accessions of six species of Chenopodium L. by random amplified polymorphic DNA fragments (RAPD). Euphytica 1999, 105:25-32.
29. Scott A.J. A review of the classification of Chenopodium L. and related genera (Chenopodiaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 1978, 100:205-220.
30. Tamura K., Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1993, 10:512-526.
31. Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28(10):2731-2739.
32. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., Gibson T.J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl. Acids Res. 1994, 22:4673-4680.
33. Uotila P. Variation, distribution and taxonomy of Chenopodium suecicum and C. album in N. Europe. Acta Bot. Fenn. 1978, 108:1-36.
34. White T.J., Bruns T., Lee S., Taylor J.W. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocols: a Guide to Methods and Applications 1990, 315-322. Academic Press, New York, USA. M.A. Innis, D.H. Gelfand, J.J. Sninsky, T.J. White (Eds.).
35. Wilson H.D. Artificial hybridization among species of Chenopodium sect. Chenopodium. Syst. Bot. 1980, 5:253-263.
36. Zietkiewicz E., Rafalaski A., Ladunda D. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR) anchored polymerase chain reaction amplifications. Genomics 1994, 20:176-183.