Estimating the impact of new-generation antifoulings on ship performance: The presence of slime

Journal of Marine Engineering and Technology

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 13-22

  Candries, M ^a   Atlar, M ^b   Anderson, C D ^c  

^a University of Newcastle upon Tyne ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c International Coatings Limited   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856428375     PISSN: 20464177     EISSN: 20568487     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/20464177.2003.11020165     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. International Maritime Organization, (2001). International Convention on Control of Harmful Anti-fouling systems on Ships, 25 October 2001.
2. Evans, SM, Birchenough, AC, and Brancato, MS, (2000). The TBT ban: out of the frying pan into the fire? Marine Pollution Bulletin, Vol 40, pp 204-211.
3. Turley, PA, Fenn, RJ, and Ritter, JC, (2000). Pyrithiones as antifoulants: environmental chemistry and preliminary risk assessment, Biofouling, Vol 15, pp 175-182.
4. Anderson, CD, and Hunter, JE, (2000). Whitherantifoul- ingpaints after TBT? NAV 2000 International Conference on Ship and Shipping Research, 13th Congress, Paper 3.7. Venice, Italy, 19-22 September 2000.
5. Wahl, M, (1989). Marine epibiosis. I: Fouling and antifouling: some basic aspects, Mar Ecol Prog Ser, Vol. 58, pp. 175-189.
6. Brady, RF, and Singer, IL, (2000). Mechanicalfactorsfavoring release from fouling release coatings. Biofouling, 15, pp 73-81.
7. Baier, RE, (1970). Surface properties influencing biological adhesion. In: Adhesion in Biological Systems, RS Manly (Ed), Academic Press, pp 15-48.
8. Meyer, AE, Baier, RE, and King, RW, (1988). Initialfouling of nontoxic coatings in fresh, brackish and sea water. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 66, pp 55-62.
9. Kovach, BS, and Swain, GF, (1998). A boat mountedfoil to measure the drag properties of antifouling coatings applied to static immersion panels. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sea water Drag Reduction, pp 169-173, Newport.
10. Millett, J, and Anderson, CD, (1997). Fighting fast ferry fouling. Fast '97, Conference Papers, Vol 1, pp 493-495.
11. Candries, M, (2001). Drag, Boundary-Layer and Roughness Characteristics of Marine Surfaces Coated with Anti foulings, PhD Thesis, Department of Marine Technology, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
12. Candries, M, Atlar, M, Guerrero, A, and Anderson, CD, (2001). Lower frictional resistance characteristics of foul-release systems, Proceedings of the Eight International Symposium on the Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures (PRADS 2001), Vol 1, pp 517-523, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
13. Candries, M, Atlar, M, Mesbahi, E, and Pazouki, K, (2003). The measurement of drag characteristics of tin-free SelfPolishing Co-polymers and Foul(ing) Release coatings using a rotor apparatus. 11th International Congress on Marine Corrosion and Fouling (to be published in a Supplement to Biofouling, February 2003), San Diego, 21-26 July 2002.
14. Weinell, CE, Olsen, K, Christoffersen, N, Martin, W, and Kiil, S, (2002). Experimental study of drag resistance on sea water immersed surfaces using a laboratory scale rotary set-up. 11th International Congress on Marine Corrosion and Fouling, (to be published in a Supplement to Biofouling, February 2003) San Diego, 21-26 July 2002.
15. Gad-el-Hak, M, and Bandyopadhyay, PR, (1994). Reynolds number effects in wall-bounded turbulent flows. Applied Mechanics Review, Vol 49, pp 307-365.
16. Grigson, CWB, (1982). The drag coefficients of a range of ship surfaces II. Trans RINA, Vol 124, pp 183-198.
17. Musker, AJ, (1977). Turbulent shear flows near irregularly rough surfaces with particular reference to ships' hulls, PhD Thesis, University of Liverpool, Liverpool.
18. Townsin, RL, and Dey, SK,(1990). The correlation of roughness drag with surface characteristics. International Workshop on Marine Roughness and Drag, RINA, London.
19. ITTC, (1990), Report of the Powering Performance Committee, Proceedings of the 19th International Towing Tank Conference, pp 235-287, Madrid.
20. Chuah, KB, Dey, SK, Thomas, TR, and Townsin, RL, (1990). A digital hull roughness analyser. International Workshop on Marine Roughness and Drag, Paper No 3, RINA, London.
21. Fitzsimmons, PA, and Ellis, J, (1990). A two-parameter roughness analyser and performance monitoring software. International Workshop on Marine Roughness and Drag, Paper No 4, RINA, London.
22. Townsin, RL, (2003). The ship hull fouling penalty. 11th International Congress on Marine Corrosion and Fouling (to be published in a Supplement to Biofouling, February 2003), San Diego, 21-26 July 2002.
23. Egan, B, (1987). Marine microbial adhesion and its consequences. In: Microbes in the Sea, MA Sleigh (Ed), Ellis Horwood Ltd.
24. Fletcher, RL, and Chamberlain, AHL, (1975). Marine fouling algae. In: Microbial Aspects of the Deterioration of Materials, R Gilbert and DW Lovelock (Ed), pp 59-81, London, Academic Press Inc.
25. Fischer, EC, Castelli, VJ, Rodgers, SD, and Bleile, HR, (1984). Technology for control of marine biofouling - a review. In: Marine Biodeterioration: An Interdisciplinary Study, JD Gostlow and R C Tipper (Ed), Maryland, USA, Naval Institute Press.
26. Palmer, RJ. and White, DC, (1997). Developmental biology of biofilms: implications for treatment and control. Trends in Microbiology, Vol 5, pp 435-440.
27. Swain G, Anil, AC, Baier, RE, Chia, F-S, Conte E, Cook, A, Hadfield, M, Haslbeck, E, Holm, E, Kavangh, C, Kohrs, D, Kovach, B, Lee, C, Mazzella, L, Meyer, AE, Qian, P-Y, Sawant, SS, Schultz, M, Sigurdsson, J, Smith, C, Soo, L, Terlizzi, A, Wagh, A, Zimmerman, R, and Zupo, V, (2000). Biofouling and barnacle adhesion data for fouling-release coatings subjected to static immersion at seven marine sites, Biofouling, Vol 16, pp 331-344.
28. McEntee, W, (1915). Variation offrictional resistance of ships with condition of wetted surface. Trans SNAME, Vol 24, pp 37-42.
29. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (1952). Marine Fouling and its Prevention. Annapolis, Maryland, US Naval Institute.
30. Denny, ME, (1951). BSRA resistance experiments on the 'Lucy Ashton': Part 1. Full scale measurements. Trans RINA, Vol 93, pp 40-57.
31. Watanabe, S, Nagamatsu, N, Yokoo, K, and Kawakami, Y, (1969). The augmentation infrictional resistance due to slime, (BSRA Translation No 3454). Journal of the Kansai Society of Naval Architects, Vol 131, pp 45.
32. Todd, FH, (1951). Skin friction resistance and the effects of surface roughness. Trans SNAME, Vol 59, pp 315-374.
33. Loeb, GI, Laster, D, and Gracik, T, (1984). The influence of microbial fouling films on hydrodynamic drag of rotating disks. In: Marine Biodeterioration: An Interdisciplinary Study, JD Gostlow and RC Tipper (Ed), Maryland, USA, Naval Institute Press.
34. Lewkowicz, AK, and Das, PK, (1986). Turbulent boundary layers on rough surfaces with and without a pliable overlayer: a simulation of marine fouling, International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol 33, pp 174-186.
35. El-Labbad, AF, (1987). Techno-economic Analysis of the Problems of the Bottom Maintenance of Ships, MPhil Thesis, Department of Marine Technology, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne.
36. Picologlou, BF, Zelver, N, and Characklis, WG, (1980). Biofilm growth and hydraulic performance, Journal of the Hydraulics Division, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol 106, pp 733-746.
37. Stoodley, P, Boyle, J, Cunningham AB, Dodds, I, Lappin- Scott, HM, and Lewandowski, Z, (1999). Biofilm structure and influence on biofouling under laminar and turbulent flows. In: CW Keevil, A Godfree, D Holt, and C Dow, (Eds), Biofilms in the Aquatic Environment, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, pp 13-24.
38. Stoodley, P, Boyle, JD, deBeer, D, and Lappin-Scott, HM, (1999). Evolving perspectives ofbiofilm structure, Biofouling, Vol 14, pp 75-90.
39. Schultz, MP, and Swain, GW, (1999). The effect of biofilms on turbulent boundary layers. Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol 121, pp 44-51.
40. Lewthwaite, JC, Molland, AF, and Thomas, KW, (1985). An investigation into the variation of ship skin frictional resistance with fouling. Trans RINA, Vol 127, pp 269-284.
41. Bohlander, GS, (1991). Biofilm effects on drag: measurements on ships. Polymers in a Marine Environment. The Institute of Marine Engineers Third International Conference, Paper 16. London.
42. Hoyt, JW, and Soli, G, (1965). Algal cultures: ability to reduce turbulent friction in flow, Science, Vol 149, pp 1509.
43. Barnaby, KC, and Dorey, AL, (1965). A towing tank storm, Trans RINA, Vol 107, pp 265-272.
44. Emerson, A, (1965). Model experiments using dilute polymer solutions instead of water, Trans NECIES, Vol 81, pp 201-212.
45. Hawkridge, HRJ, and Gadd, GE, (1971). Investigation of drag reduction by certain algae, Nature, Vol 230, pp 253-255.
46. Rosen, MW, and Cornford, NE, (1971). Fluidfriction offish slimes, Nature, Vol 234, pp 49-51.
47. Hoyt, JW, (1990). Drag reduction by polymers and surfactants. In: Viscous Drag Reduction in Boundary Layers, DM Bushnell and JN Hefner (Eds), American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, pp 413-432, Washington, DC.
48. Hammer, F, Hellsten, M, and Uneback, I, (1998). 10years of experience with demonstration of drag reduction in the district heating system of Herning, Denmark. Proceedings of the 11th European Drag Reduction Working Meeting, Z Chara and J Pollert, (Eds), Institute of Hydrodynamics, pp 21-22, Prague.
49. Canham, HJS, Catchpole, JP, and Long, RF, (1971). Boundary layer additives to reduce ship resistance, The Naval Architect, July 1971, pp 187-213.
50. Kowalski, T, (1998). Practical applications of dilute polymer additives for water craft. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sea water Drag Reduction, pp 289-293, Newport.
51. American Standard for Testing and Materials (2000), Standard test method for measurement of barnacleadhesion strength in shear, D5618-94.
52. Terlizzi, A, Conte, E, Zupo, V, and Mazzella, L, (2000). Biological succession on silicone fouling-release surfaces: long-term exposure tests in the harbour of Ischia, Italy. Biofouling, Vol 15, pp 327-342.
53. Denny, M, (1989). A limpet shell shape that reduces drag: laboratory demonstration of a hydrodynamic mechanism and an explanation of its effectiveness in nature, CanadianJournal of Zoology, Vol 67, pp 2098-2106.
54. Walderhaug, H, (1986). Paint roughness effects on skin friction. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 33, pp. 96-100.
55. White, FM, (1994). Fluid Mechanics, 3rd Edition, McGraw- Hill, New York, 736pp.
56. Manen, JDv, and Oossanen, Pv, (1988). Resistance. In: Principles of Naval Architecture, Second Revision, EV Lewis (Ed), SNAME, Vol 2, Chapter 5, p 58.
57. Schultz, MP, Finlay, JA, Callow, ME, and Callow, JA, (2002). Three models to relate detachment of low form fouling at laboratory and ship scale, 11th International Congress on Marine Corrosion and Fouling (to be published in a Supplement to Biofouling, February 2003), San Diego, 21-26 July 2002.
58. Morgenroth, E, and Wilderer, PA, (2000). Influence of detachment mechanisms on competition in biofilms, Water Research, Vol 34, pp 417-426.
59. van Loosdrecht, MCM, Eikelboom, D, Gjaltema, A, Mulder, A, Tijhuis, L, and Heijnen, JJ, (1995), Biofilm structures, Water Science Technology, Vol 32, No 8, pp 35-43.
60. Klijnstra, JW, Overbeke, K, Sonke, H, Head, R, and Ferrari, GM, (2002). Critical speeds for fouling removal from a silicone coating. 11th International Congress on Marine Corrosion and Fouling, San Diego, 21-26 July 2002.
61. Haslbeck, E, Holm, ER, Talbott, WJ, and Field, A, (2002). Evaluation ofhydrodynamic drag on antifouling and Fouling Release coatings using the friction disk machine. 11th International Congress on Marine Corrosion and Fouling, San Diego, 21-26 July 2002.