Linking NAMEA and Input output for 'consumption vs. production perspective' analyses. Evidence on emission efficiency and aggregation biases using the Italian and Spanish environmental accounts.

Ecological Economics

Volumn 74, Issue , 2012, Pages 71-84

  Marin, Giovanni ^a   Mazzanti, Massimiliano ^b   Montini, Anna ^c  

^a IMT SCHOOL FOR ADVANCED STUDIES LUCCA   (Italy)

^b Dipartimento Economia Istituzioni Territorio   (Italy)

^c Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche   (Italy)

Author keywords

Aggregation bias; Extended Input Output; Final demand; NAMEA; Sustainable consumption and production

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOMESTICATION; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; EUROPEAN UNION; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ITALY; SPAIN;

EID: 84856396582     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ahmad N., Wyckoff A. Carbon dioxide emissions embodied in international trade of goods. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2003/15 2003, OECD, Paris.
2. 2 emissions in Spain. Ecological Economics 2009, 69:905-914.
3. Andrew R., Peters G.P., Lennox J. Approximation and regional aggregation in multi-regional input-output analysis for national carbon footprint accounting. Economic Systems Research 2009, 21:311-335.
4. Arto, I., Roca, J., Serrano, M., 2010. Accounting for embodied emissions in international trade: physical vs monetary trade flows, mimeo.
5. Bleischwitz R., Welfens P., Zhong Xiang Z. Sustainable Growth and Resource Productivity: Economic and Global Policy Issues 2009, Greenleaf Publishing, United Kingdom.
6. Cole M.A. Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecological Economics 2004, 48(1):71-81.
7. Copeland B.R., Taylor M.S. Trade, growth and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature 2004, 42:7-71.
8. Costantini V., Mazzanti M., Montini A. Hybrid Economic Environmental Accounts 2011, Routledge, London.
9. De Boo A., Bosch P., Gorter C.N., Keuning S.J. An Environmental Module and the Complete System of National Accounts. Occasional Papers of the CBS, No. NA-046, Voorburg (NL) 1991.
10. ETC/SCP Key messages on material resource use and efficiency in Europe 2011, ETC/SCP European Topic Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production, Copenhagen.
11. ETC/SCP Progress in sustainable consumption and production in Europe 2011, ETC/SCP European Topic Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production, Copenhagen.
12. European Commission (EC) EU Industrial Structure 2009, Performance and Competitiveness, Brussels 2009.
13. Eurostat Eurostat Manual of Supply, Use and Input-Output Tables. Eurostat Methodologies and Working Papers 2008, Eurostat, Luxembourg.
14. EUROSTAT Creating Consolidated and Aggregated EU27 Supply, Use and Input-Output Tables, Adding Environmental Extensions (Air Emissions), and Conducting Leontief-type Modelling to Approximate Carbon and Other 'Footprints' of EU27 Consumption for 2000 to 2006 2011, EUROSTAT, Luxembourg.
15. Frankel J., Rose A. Is trade good or bad for the environment?. The Review of Economics and Statistics 2005, 87:85-91.
16. Gallego B., Lenzen M. A consistent input-output formulation of shared producer and consumer responsibility. Economic Systems Research 2005, 17:365-391.
17. Harris R. Methods for estimating air emissions from the production of goods imported into the UK. Prepared for DG Regional Policy and Eurostat, Working Paper 2/2001/B/5 2001, European Commission, Eurostat, Brussels.
18. Hatanaka M. Note on Consolidation within a Leontief System. Econometrica 1952, 20:301-303.
19. Hoekstra R. A complete overview of environmental input-output articles. Paper Presented at the I-O Society Conference, Sidney, 20-25 June 2010 2010.
20. Huppes G., de Koning A., Suh S., Heijungs R., Oers L., van Nielsen P., Guinee J. Environmental impacts of consumption in the EU: high resolution input output tables with detailed environmental extensions. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2005, 10:129-146.
21. IPTS Environmental Impacts of Products (EIPRO), IPTS/ESTO Project IPTS. European Commission Technical Report Series 2006, IPTS, Seville.
22. Lenzen M. Aggregation versus disaggregation in input-output analysis of the environment. Economic Systems Research 2011, 23:73-89.
23. Levinson A. Offshoring pollution: is the United States increasingly importing polluting goods?. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Oxford University Press for Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 2010, 4(1):63-83.
24. Marin, G., Mazzanti, M., in press. The Evolution of Environmental and Labor Productivity Dynamics - Sector Analyses and Decoupling/Recoupling Trends on a 1990-2007 Italian NAMEA, Journal of Evolutionary Economics.
25. Mazzanti M., Montini A. Embedding emission efficiency at regional level. Analyses using NAMEA. Ecological Economics 2010, 69(12):2457-2467.
26. Mazzanti M., Musolesi A. Carbon Abatement Leaders and laggards. Nota di lavoro 2010, 149. FEEM, Milan.
27. Mazzanti M., Zoboli R. Environmental efficiency and labour productivity: trade off or joint dynamics?. Ecological Economics 2009, 68(4):1182-1194. (15).
28. Miller R.E., Blair P.D. Input-Output Analysis - Foundations and Extensions 2009, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass. Second edition.
29. Moll S., Vrgoc M., Watson D., Femia A., Pedersen O.G., Villanueva A. Environmental input-output analyses based on NAMEA data - a comparative European study on environmental pressures arising from consumption and production patterns. ETC/RWM Working Paper 2/2007 2007, European Topic Centre - Resource and Waste Management, Copenhagen.
30. Morimoto Y. On aggregation problems in input-output analysis. Review of Economic Studies 1970, 37:119-126.
31. 2 Embodiments in International Trade: Evidence from the Harmonised Input-Output and Bilateral Trade Database. Statistical Analysis of Science, Technology and Industry Working Paper 2009/3 2009, OECD, Paris.
32. OECD Resource Productivity in the G8 and OECD 2011, OECD, Paris, (May).
33. Peters G. From Production-based to Consumption-based National Emission Inventories. Ecological Economics 2007, 65:13-23.
34. Roca J., Serrano M. Income growth and atmospheric pollution in Spain: an input-output approach. Ecological Economics 2007, 63:230-242.
35. Serrano M., Dietzenbacher E. Responsibility and trade emission balances: an evaluation of approaches. Ecological Economics 2010, 69:2224-2232.
36. 2 emissions embodied in trade: the effects of sector aggregation. Energy Economics 2010, 32:166-175.
37. Turner K., Lenzen M., Wiedmann J.B. Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities - part 1: a technical note on combining input-output and ecological footprint analysis. Ecological Economics 2007, 62:37-44.
38. Wyckoff A.W., Roop J.M. The embodiment of carbon in imports of manufactured products - implications for international agreements on greenhouse gases emissions. Energy Policy 1994, 22:187-194.