Environmental impacts of consumption in the European Union: High-resolution input-output tables with detailed environmental extensions

Journal of Industrial Ecology

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 129-146

  Huppes, Gjalt ^a   De Koning, Arjan ^a   Suh, Sangwon ^b,c   Heijungs, Reinout ^c   Van Oers, Lauran ^c   Nielsen, Per ^a,c   Guinée, Jeroen B ^c  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c University of Minnesota ^*

Author keywords

Comprehensive environmental data archive (CEDA); Hybrid life cycle assessment; Input output analysis (IOA); Integrated product policy (IPP); Life cycle assessment; National Accounting Matrix including Environmental Accounts (NAMEA)

Indexed keywords

COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA ARCHIVE (CEDA); HYBRID LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS (IOA); INTEGRATED PRODUCT POLICY (IPP); LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; NATIONAL ACCOUNTING MATRIX INCLUDING ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTS (NAMEA);

ENERGY UTILIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; PUBLIC POLICY; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; EUROPEAN UNION; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33750625110     PISSN: 10881980     EISSN: 15309290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jiec.2006.10.3.129     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aspelin, A. L. and A. H. Grube. 1999. Pesticides industry sales and usage, 1996 and 1997 market estimates. Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
2. Cambridge Econometrics. 2005. E3ME: An energy-environment-economy model of Europe. 〈www.camecon.co.uk/e3me/〉. Accessed 25 January 2005.
3. Center for Global Trade Analysis. 2005. GTAP: Global trade analysis project. 〈www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu〉. Accessed 25 January 2005.
4. Duchin, F. 2005. Sustainable consumption of food: A framework for analyzing scenarios about changes of diets. Journal of Industrial Ecology 9(1-2): 99-114.
5. EcoInvent 2001. 〈www.ecoinvent.ch〉. Accessed 25 January 2005.
6. EIPRO data. 2005. 〈www.leidenuniv.nl/cml/ssp/〉.
7. European Commission. 2003. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Integrated product policy - Building on environmental life cycle thinking. COM(2003) 302 final. Brussels.
8. EU (European Union). 1999. New Cronos - Theme 3: Population and social conditions - Household Budget Survey. 〈http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu. int〉. Accessed May 2006.
9. Eurostat. 2003. Waste generated and treated in Europe, data 1990-2001. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
10. Fawcett, T., K. Lane, and B. Boardman. 2000. Carbon futures for European households. Oxford, UK: Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford.
11. GEM-E3. 2005. The GEM-E3 model. 〈www.geme3.net/〉. Accessed 25 January 2005.
12. Guinée, J. B., ed. (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment - Operational guide to the ISO standards. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers/Springer-Verlag.
13. Haan, M. de. 2004. Accounting for goods and for bads. Measuring environmental pressure in a national accounts framework. Ph.D. thesis. Voorburg, the Netherlands: Statistics Netherlands.
14. Heijungs, R., A. de Koning, S. Suh, and G. Huppes. 2006. Toward an information tool for integrated product policy: Requirements for data and computation. Journal of Industrial Ecology 10(3): 147-158.
15. Hertwich, E. G. 2005. Consumption and the rebound effect: An industrial ecology perspective. Journal of Industrial Ecology 9(1-2): 85-98.
16. Hertwich, E., T. Briceno, P. Hofstetter, and A. Inaba, eds. 2005. Sustainable consumption: The contribution of research. Paper presented at Workshop, 10-12 February, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway. 〈www.indecol.ntnu.no/ publications.php〉. Accessed 25 January 2005.
17. Hubacek, K., A. Inaba, and S. Stagl, eds. 2004. Proceedings International Workshop on Driving Forces of and Barriers to Sustainable Consumption. Leeds, UK: University of Leeds.
18. Huijbregts, M. A. J., L. Breedveld, G. Huppes, A. de Koning, L. van Oers, and S. Suh. 2001. Normalisation figures for environmental life cycle assessment - The Netherlands (1997/1998), Western Europe (1995) and the World (1990 and 1995). Journal of Cleaner Production 11(7): 737-748.
19. Huppes, G., and M. Ishikawa. 2005. A framework for quantified eco-efficiency analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 9(4): 25-41.
20. Huppes, G., G. Warringa, M. D. Davidson, J. Kuyper, and H. A. Udo de Haes. Forthcoming. Ecoefficient environmental policy in oil and gas production in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics.
21. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 1997. ISO 14040, Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework. Ref. No. ISO 14040:1997(E). Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
22. Joshi, S. 2000. Product environmental life-cycle assessment using input-output techniques. Journal of Industrial Ecology 3(2-3): 95-120.
23. Lecomber, J. A. C. R. 1975. A critique of methods of adjusting, updating and projecting matrices. Estimating and projecting input-output coefficients. In Estimating and projecting input-output coefficients, edited by R. I. G. Allen and W. F. Gossling. London: Input-Output Publishing Company.
24. Leontief, W. W. 1970. Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: An input-output approach. Review of Economics and Statistics 52(3): 262-271.
25. Linden, J. A. van der and J. Oosterhaven. 1995. European Community intercountry input-output relations: Construction method and main results for 1965-85. Economic Systems Research 7(3): 249-69.
26. Matthews, H. S. and M. J. Small. 2001. Extending the boundaries of life-cycle assessment through environmental economic input-output model. Journal of Industrial Ecology 4(3): 7-10.
27. Nijdam, D. S. and H. C. Wilting, 2003. Milieudruk consumptie in beeld [Environmental load due to private consumption depicted]. RIVM Rapport 7714040004. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: RIVM.
28. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 1995. Input-output table (Edition 1995): Details of coverage. 〈www.oecd.org/ document/6/0,2340,and_2825_495684_ 2672966_1_1_1_1,00.html〉. See European Countries listed. Accessed May 2006.
29. Oers, L. van, M. Huijbregts, G. Huppes, A. de Koning, and S. Suh, eds. 2001. LCA normalisation data for the Netherlands, Europe and the World. RIZA werkdocument 2001.059x. Lelystad/Leiden, the Netherlands: Rijksinstituut voor Integraal Zoetwaterbeheer en Afvalwaterbehandeling.
30. Stone, R. A. 1963. Input-output accounts and national accounts. Paris: Organization for European Economic Cooperation.
31. Suh, S. 2004a. Functions, commodities and environmental impacts in an ecological economic model. Ecological Economics 48(4): 451-467.
32. Suh, S. 2004b. Comprehensive Environmental Data Archive (CEDA) 3.0. User's guide. Leiden, the Netherlands: Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University.
33. Suh, S., 2005. Developing sectoral environmental database for input-output analysis: Comprehensive Environmental Data Archive of the U.S. Economic Systems Research 17(4): 449-469.
34. Suh, S., ed. Forthcoming. Handbook of input-output economics in industrial ecology. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
35. Suh, S. and G. Huppes, 2002. Missing inventory estimation tool using extended input-output analysis. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 7(3): 134-140.
36. Suh, S., and G. Huppes, 2005. Methods in life cycle inventory (LCI) of a product. Journal of Cleaner Production 13(7): 687-697.
37. Suh, S., M. Lenzen, G. Treloar, H. Hondo, A. Horvath, G. Huppes, O. Jolliet, U. Klann, W. Krewitt, Y. Moriguchi, J. Munksgaard, and G. Norris. 2004. System boundary selection for life cycle inventories. Environmental Science & Technology 38(3): 657-664.
38. Tukker, A., G. Huppes, L. van Oers, S. Suh, A. De Koning, R. Heijungs, J, Guinée, B. Jansen, M. van Holderbeke, Th. Geerken, and P. Nielsen. 2005. Environmental impacts of products. Draft report. 〈http://europa.eu.int/ comm/environment/ipp/identifying.htm〉. Accessed 25 January 2005.
39. Tukker, A., G. Huppes, L. van Oers, and R. Heijungs. Forthcoming. Environmentally extended input-output tables and models for Europe. Report for DG JRC, IPTS, under Tender No J02/29/2004. Seville, Spain: Institute for Protective Technological Studies (IPTS).
40. Udo de Haes, H. A., R. Heijungs, S. Suh, and G. Huppes. 2004. Three strategies to overcome the limitations of life-cycle assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology 8(3): 19-32.
41. Washida, T. 2004. Economy-wide model of rebound effect for environmental efficiency. In Proceedings International Workshop on Driving Forces of and Barriers to Sustainable Consumption, edited by K. Hubacek, A. Inaba, and S. Stagl. Leeds, UK: University of Leeds.
42. WDNR (Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources). 2004. Wisconsin DNR's recycled commodity prices Web site. 〈www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/aw/wm/Markets/ RecMarPrices/〉. Accessed 25 January 2005.
43. Weidema, B. P., A. M. Nielsen, K. Christiansen, G. Norris, P. Notten, S. Suh, and J. Madsen. 2005. Prioritisation within the integrated product policy. 2.-0 LCA. Copenhagen, Denmark: Consultants for Danish EPA.
44. Wiedmann, T., J. Minx, J. Barrett, and M. Wackernagel. 2006. Allocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input-output analysis. Ecological Economics 56(1): 28-48.
45. Wilting, H. C., W. F. Blom, R. Thomas, and A. M. Idenburg. 2001. Description and application of dynamic input-output model DIMITRI. Report 778001005. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM).