Semantic mappings and locality of nursing diagnostic concepts in UMLS

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 93-100

  Kim, Tae Youn ^a   Coenen, Amy ^a   Hardiker, Nicholas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Health informatics; Nursing knowledge representation; Semantic mapping; Standardized nursing terminology; Unified Medical Language System

Indexed keywords

HEALTH INFORMATICS; HUMAN EXPERT; KNOWLEDGE RESOURCE; NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINES; NURSING INFORMATION SYSTEM; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SEMANTIC MAPPING; SEMANTIC NETWORK; UNIFIED FRAMEWORK; UNIFIED MEDICAL LANGUAGE SYSTEMS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INTEROPERABILITY; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; MAPPING; MEDICINE; SEMANTICS; TERMINOLOGY;

NURSING;

ARTICLE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; NANDA TAXONOMY; NURSING CARE PLAN; NURSING DIAGNOSIS; NURSING DISCIPLINE; NURSING KNOWLEDGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS;

HUMANS; NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE (U.S.); SEMANTICS; SYSTEMATIZED NOMENCLATURE OF MEDICINE; UNIFIED MEDICAL LANGUAGE SYSTEM; UNITED STATES; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 84856365349     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. US Department of Health & Human Services. Electronic Health Records and Meaningful Use; 2011. http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt?open=512&objID=2996&mode=2.
2. Blumenthal D. Launching HITECH. New Engl J Med 2010, 362:382-385.
3. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures; 2010. https://www.cms.gov/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/EP-MU-TOC-Core-and-MenuSet-Objectives.pdf.
4. Dunton N., Montalvo I. Transforming nursing data into quality care: profiles of quality improvement in US Healthcare Facilities 2007, American Nurses Association Inc., Silver Spring (MD).
5. American Nurses Association, ANA. Recognized Terminologies and Data Element Sets; 2006. http://www.nursingworld.org/npii/terminologies.htm.
6. Saba V. Clinical care classification (CCC) system manual: a guide to nursing documentation 2007, Springer Publishing Company, New York City (NY).
7. International Council of Nurses. International Classification for Nursing Practice Version 2. Geneva, Switzerland: ICN; 2009.
8. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association-International (NANDA-I) nursing diagnoses 2009-2011: definitions and classification 2009, Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, UK. T.H. Herdman (Ed.).
9. Nursing interventions classification (NOC) 2008, Mosby Inc., St. Louis (MO). 5th ed. G.M. Bulechek, H.K. Butcher, J.M. Dochterman (Eds.).
10. Nursing outcomes classification (NOC) 2008, Mosby Inc., St. Louis (MO). 4th ed. S. Moorhead, M.M. Johnson, M. Maas (Eds.).
11. Martin KS. The Omaha system: a key to practice, documentation, and information management. reprinted 2nd ed. Omaha (NE): Health Connections Press; 2005.
12. Association of Operating Room Nurses. PNDS - Perioperative Nursing Data Set. 3rd ed. Denver (CO): AORN Inc.; 2011.
13. International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation. ICN and IHTSDO Team-up to Ensure a Common Health Terminology; 2010. http://www.ihtsdo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Docs_01/Press_Releases/ICN_and_IHTSDO_Announcement_March_2010.pdf.
14. National Library of Medicine. UMLS Source Release Documentation; 2011. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/sourcereleasedocs/.
15. National Library of Medicine. UMLS reference manual. Bethesda (MD): NLM; 2009. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9676/.
16. McCray A.T., Nelson S.J. The representation of meaning in the UMLS. Methods Inf Med 1995, 34:193-201.
17. McCray A.T., Bodenreider O. A conceptual framework for the biomedical domain. The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective 2002, 181-198. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. R. Green, C.A. Bean, S.H. Myaeng (Eds.).
18. Hardiker N.R., Coenen A. Interpretation of an international terminology standard in the development of a logic-based compositional terminology. Int J Med Inform 2007, 76(Suppl. 2):S274-S280.
19. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Health informatics - integration of a reference terminology model for nursing (ISO/TX 18104:2003). Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2003.
20. Matney S.A., DaDamio R., Couderc C., Dlugos M., Evans J., Gianonne G., et al. Translation and integration of CCC nursing diagnoses into ICNP. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008, 15:791-793.
21. Kim T.Y., Coenen A. Toward harmonising WHO international classifications: a nursing perspective. Inform Health Soc Care 2011, 36:35-49.
22. Bodenreider O., Bean C.A. Relationships among knowledge structures: vocabulary integration within a subject domain. Relationships in the organization of knowledge 2001, 81-98. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. C.A. Bean, R. Green (Eds.).
23. Grabar N., Varoutas P.C., Rizand P., Livartowski A., Hamon T. Automatic acquisition of synonym resources and assessment of their impact on the enhanced search in EHRs. Methods Inf Med 2009, 48:149-154.
24. Meystre S., Haug P.J. Natural language processing to extract medical problems from electronic clinical documents: performance evaluation. J Biomed Inform 2006, 39:589-599.
25. Friedman C., Shagina L., Lussier Y., Hripcsak G. Automated encoding of clinical documents based on natural language processing. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004, 11:392-402.
26. Huang Y., Lowe H.J., Klein D., Cucina R.J. Improved identification of noun phrases in clinical radiology reports using a high-performance statistical natural language parser augmented with the UMLS specialist lexicon. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005, 12:275-285.
27. Cimino J.J., Min H., Perl Y. Consistency across the hierarchies of the UMLS semantic network and metathesaurus. J Biomed Inform 2003, 36:450-461.
28. Hardiker N.R., Casey A., Coenen A., Konicek D. Mutual enhancement of diverse terminologies. AMIA Ann Symp Proc 2006, 319-323.
29. College of American Pathologists (CAP). SNOMED CT® mappings to NANDA, NIC, and NOC now licensed for free access through national library of medicine; 2005. http://www.cap.org/apps/cap.portal?_nfpb=true&cntvwrPtlt_actionOverride=%2Fportlets%2FcontentViewer%2Fshow&_windowLabel=cntvwrPtlt&cntvwrPtlt%7BactionForm.contentReference%7D=media_resources%2Fnewsrel_nlm_mappings.html&_state=maximized&_pageLabel=cntvwr.
30. CliniClue®. The Clinical Information Consultancy Ltd.; 2011. http://www.cliniclue.com/.
31. McCray A.T., Burgun A., Bodenreider O. Aggregating UMLS semantic types for reducing conceptual complexity. Stud Health Technol Inform 2001, 84:216-220.
32. Oxford dictionaries. UK: Oxford University Press; 2011. http://oxforddictionaries.com/.
33. Cimino J.J. Auditing the unified medical language system with semantic methods. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998, 5:41-51.
34. Bodenreider O., McCray A.T. Exploring semantic groups through visual approaches. J Biomed Inform 2003, 36:414-432.
35. Gu H., Perl Y., Geller J., Halper M., Liu L.M., Cimino J.J. Representing the UMLS as an object-oriented database: modeling issues and advantages. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000, 7:66-80.
36. Perl Y., Chen Z., Halper M., Geller J., Zhang L., Peng Y. The cohesive metaschema: a higher-level abstraction of the UMLS semantic network. J Biomed Inform 2002, 35:194-212.
37. Zhang L., Perl Y., Halper M., Geller J., Hripcsak G. A lexical metaschema for the UMLS semantic network. Artif Intell Med 2005, 33:41-59.
38. Chen Y., Gu H., Perl Y., Halper M., Xu J. Expanding the extent of a UMLS semantic type via group neighborhood auditing. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009, 16:746-757.
39. National Library of Medicine. Nursing Problem List Subset of SNOMED CT; 2011. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/Snomed/nursing_problemlist_subset.html.