Exploring semantic groups through visual approaches

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 414-432

  Bodenreider, Olivier ^a   McCray, Alexa T ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Correspondence analysis; Graph; Information exploration; Information visualization; Semantic network; Semantic relationships; Unified Medical Language System

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; SEMANTICS; VISUAL SYSTEM;

EID: 0842283377     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2003.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. McCray A.T. The scope and structure of the first version of the UMLS Semantic Network. Proc. Annu. Symp. Comput. Appl. Med. Care. 1990;126-130.
2. McCray A.T., Burgun A., Bodenreider O. Aggregating UMLS semantic types for reducing conceptual complexity. Medinfo. 10(Pt 1):2001;216-220.
3. Chen Z., Perl Y., Halper M., Geller J., Gu H. Partitioning the UMLS semantic network. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 6(2):2002;102-108.
4. Nelson S.J., Sheretz D.D., Tuttle M.S., Erlbaum M.S. Using MetaCard: a HyperCard browser for biomedical knowledge sources. Proc. Annu. Symp. Comput. Appl. Med. Care. 1990;151-154.
5. Rindflesch T.C., Fiszman M. The interaction of domain knowledge and linguistic structure in natural language processing: interpreting hypernymic propositions in biomedical text. J. Biomed. Inform. 36:2003;462-477.
6. Cimino J.J. Auditing the unified medical language system with semantic methods. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 5(1):1998;41-51.
7. Greenacre M.J. Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. 1984;Academic Press, London.
8. Herman I., Melancon G., Marshall M.S. Graph visualization and navigation in information visualization: a survey. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graphics. 6(1):2000;24-43.
9. Michailidis G., de Leeuw J. Data visualization through graph drawing. Computation. Stat. 16(3):2001;435-450.
10. Hetzler B. Visual analysis and exploration of relationships. Green R., Bean C.A., Myaeng S.H. The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. 2002;199-217 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
11. Tuttle M.S., Cole W.G., Sheretz D.D., Nelson S.J. Navigating to knowledge. Methods Inf. Med. 34(1-2):1995;214-231.
12. Hearst M, Karadi C. Cat-a-Cone: an interactive interface for specifying searches and viewing retrieval results using a large category hierarchy. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 1997:246-55.
13. Li Q., Shilane P., Noy N.F., Musen M.A. Ontology acquisition from on-line knowledge sources. Proc. AMIA Symp. 2000;497-501.
14. Bader G.D., Hogue C.W. An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics. 4(1):2003;2.
15. Kamps J. Visualizing WordNet structure. In: Proceedings of the First Global WordNet Conference, 2002:182-6.
16. Stapley B.J., Benoit G. Biobibliometrics: information retrieval and visualization from co-occurrences of gene names in Medline abstracts. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 2000;529-540.
17. Bormel J.I., Ferguson L.R. Visualization and analysis of co-occurrence and cross-tabulation data in medical research. Proc. Annu. Symp. Comput. Appl. Med. Care. 1994;944-998.
18. Good P.I. Permutation tests: a practical guide to resampling methods for testing hypotheses. 2nd ed. 2000;Springer, New York.