The effects of aging on lifetime of auditory sensory memory in humans

Biological Psychology

Volumn 89, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 306-312

  Cheng, Chia Hsiung ^a,b   Lin, Yung Yang ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b TAIPEI VETERANS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Aging; Auditory sensory memory; Humans; Magnetoencephalography (MEG); N100m; Recovery cycle

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; AUDITORY MEMORY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGING; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; REACTION TIME;

EID: 84856350432     PISSN: 03010511     EISSN: 18736246     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adams R.D., Victor M. The Neurology of Aging 1989, McGraw-Hill, New York.
2. Alain C., McDonald K.L., Ostroff J.M., Schneider B. Aging: a switch from automatic to controlled processing of sounds?. Psychology and Aging 2004, 19:125-133.
3. Alain C., Woods D.L. Age-related changes in processing auditory stimuli during visual attention: evidence for deficits in inhibitory control and sensory memory. Psychology and Aging 1999, 14:507-519.
4. Budd T.W., Barry R.J., Gordon E., Rennie C., Michie P.T. Decrement of the N1 auditory event-related potential with stimulus repetition: habituation vs. refractoriness. International Organization of Psychophysiology 1998, 31:51-68.
5. Cheng C.H., Hsu W.Y., Shih Y.H., Lin H.C., Liao K.K., Wu Z.A., Lin Y.Y. Differential cerebral reactivity to shortest and longer tones: neuromagnetic and behavioral evidence. Hearing Research 2010, 268:260-270.
6. Cooper R.J., Todd J., McGill K., Michie P.T. Auditory sensory memory and the aging brain: a mismatch negativity study. Neurobiology of Aging 2006, 27:752-762.
7. Cowan N. Multiple concurrent thoughts: the meaning and developmental neuropsychology of working memory. Developmental Neuropsychology 2010, 35:447-474.
8. Cowan N., Lichty W., Grove T.R. Properties of memory for unattended spoken syllables. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1990, 16:258-269.
9. Cowan N., Saults J.S., Nugent L.D. The role of absolute and relative amounts of time in forgetting within immediate memory: the case of tone pitch comparisons. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1997, 4:393-397.
10. Cowan N., Winkler I., Teder W., Näätanen R. Memory prerequisites of mismatch negativity in the auditory event-related potential (ERP). Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1993, 19:909-921.
11. Eulitz C., Diesch E., Pantev C., Hampson S., Elbert T. Magnetic and electric brain activity evoked by the processing of tone and vowel stimuli. Journal of Neuroscience 1995, 15:2748-2755.
12. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:1030-1044.
13. Fruhstorfer H., Soveri P., Jarvilehto T. Short-term habituation of the auditory evoked response in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1970, 28:153-161.
14. Gaal Z.A., Csuhaj R., Molnar M. Age-dependent changes of auditory evoked potentials-effect of task difficulty. Biological Psychology 2007, 76:196-208.
15. Gaeta H., Friedman D., Ritter W., Cheng J. An event-related potential study of age-related changes in sensitivity to stimulus deviance. Neurobiology of Aging 1998, 19:447-459.
16. Gazzaley A., D'Esposito M. Top-down modulation and normal aging. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2007, 1097:67-83.
17. Godey B., Schwartz D., de Graaf J.B., Chauvel P., Liegeois-Chauvel C. Neuromagnetic source localization of auditory evoked fields and intracerebral evoked potentials: a comparison of data in the same patients. Clinical Neurophysiology 2001, 112:1850-1859.
18. Grau C., Fuentemilla L., Marco-Pallares J. Functional neural dynamics underlying auditory event-related N1 and N1 suppression response. Neuroimage 2007, 36:522-531.
19. Hamada Y., Otsuka S., Okamoto T., Suzuki R. The profile of the recovery cycle in human primary and secondary somatosensory cortex: a magnetoencephalography study. Clinical Neurophysiology 2002, 113:1787-1793.
20. Hämäläinen M., Hari R., Ilmoniemi R.J., Knuutila J., Lounasmaa O.V. Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working brain. Reviews of Modern Physics 1993, 65:413-497.
21. Hari R., Hämäläinen M., Ilmoniemi R., Kaukoranta E., Reinikainen K., Salminen J., Alho K., Näätänen R., Sams M. Responses of the primary auditory cortex to pitch changes in a sequence of tone pips: neuromagnetic recordings in man. Neuroscience Letters 1984, 50:127-132.
22. Hari R., Parkkonen L., Nangini C. The brain in time: insights from neuromagnetic recordings. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2010, 1191:89-109.
23. Hsiao F.J., Cheng C.H., Liao K.K., Lin Y.Y. Cortico-cortical phase synchrony in auditory mismatch processing. Biological Psychology 2010, 84:336-345.
24. Hsiao F.J., Wu Z.A., Ho L.T., Lin Y.Y. Theta oscillation during auditory change detection: an MEG study. Biological Psychology 2009, 81:58-66.
25. Jääskeläinen I.P., Ahveninen J., Bonmassar G., Dale A.M., Ilmoniemi R.J., Levänen S., Lin F.H., May P., Melcher J., Stufflebeam S., Tiitinen H., Belliveau J.W. Human posterior auditory cortex gates novel sounds to consciousness. Proceedings of National Academy of Science of the United States of America 2004, 101:6809-6814.
26. Kazmerski V.A., Friedman D., Ritter W. Mismatch negativity during attend and ignore conditions in Alzheimer's disease. Biological Psychiatry 1997, 42:382-402.
27. Kujala T., Tervaniemi M., Schröger E. The mismatch negativity in cognitive and clinical neuroscience: theoretical and methodological considerations. Biological Psychology 2007, 74:1-19.
28. Kuriki S., Murase M. Neuromagnetic study of the auditory responses in right and left hemispheres of the human brain evoked by pure tones and speech sounds. Experimental Brain Research 1989, 77:127-134.
29. Lin Y.Y., Chen W.T., Liao K.K., Yeh T.C., Wu Z.A., Ho L.T. Hemispheric balance in coding speech and non-speech sounds in Chinese participants. Neuroreport 2005, 16:469-473.
30. Lu Z.L., Williamson S.J., Kaufman L. Behavioral lifetime of human auditory sensory memory predicted by physiological measures. Science 1992, 258:1668-1670.
31. Musiek F.E. Neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and central auditory assessment. Part III. Corpus callosum and efferent pathways. Ear Hearing 1986, 7:349-358.
32. Näätänen R., Gaillard A.W., Mantysalo S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica (Amsterdam) 1978, 42:313-329.
33. Näätänen R., Paavilainen P., Rinne T., Alho K. The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clinical Neurophysiology 2007, 118:2544-2590.
34. Näätänen R., Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987, 24:375-425.
35. Pekkonen E. Mismatch negativity in aging and in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Audio Neurootology 2000, 5:216-224.
36. Pekkonen E., Jousmaki V., Partanen J., Karhu J. Mismatch negativity area and age-related auditory memory. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1993, 87:321-325.
37. Pekkonen E., Rinne T., Reinikainen K., Kujala T., Alho K., Näätänen R. Aging effects on auditory processing: an event-related potential study. Experimental Aging Research 1996, 22:171-184.
38. Ritter W., Paavilainen P., Lavikainen J., Reinikainen K., Alho K., Sams M., Näätänen R. Event-related potentials to repetition and change of auditory stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1992, 83:306-321.
39. Rosburg T. Effects of tone repetition on auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields. Clinical Neurophysiology 2004, 115:898-905.
40. Sams M., Hari R., Rif J., Knuutila A. The human auditory sensory memory trace persists about 10s: neuromagnetic evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1993, 5:363-370.
41. Taulu S., Kajola M., Simola J. Suppression of interference and artifacts by the Signal Space Separation Method. Brain Topography 2004, 16:269-275.
42. Taulu S., Simola J., Kajola M. Applications of the signal space separation method. The IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2005, 53:3359-3372.
43. Ulanovsky N., Las L., Nelken I. Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:391-398.
44. Uusitalo M.A., Jousmaki V., Hari R. Activation trace lifetime of human cortical responses evoked by apparent visual motion. Neuroscience Letters 1997, 224:45-48.
45. Uusitalo M.A., Williamson S.J., Seppa M.T. Dynamical organisation of the human visual system revealed by lifetimes of activation traces. Neuroscience Letters 1996, 213:149-152.
46. Willis S.L., Tennstedt S.L., Marsiske M., Ball K., Elias J., Koepke K.M., Morris J.N., Rebok G.W., Unverzagt F.W., Stoddard A.M., Wright E. Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults. Journal of American Medical Association 2006, 296:2805-2814.
47. Zehnder F., Martin M., Altgassen M., Clare L. Memory training effects in old age as markers of plasticity: a meta-analysis. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2009, 27:507-520.