Content analysis of newspaper coverage of the florida panther

Conservation Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 171-179

  Jacobson, Susan K ^a   Langin, Cynthia ^a,b   Carlton, J Stuart ^a   Kaid, Lynda Lee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Carnivore; Communication; Content analysis; Media; Panther; Public; Puma

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; CARNIVORE; COMMUNICATION NETWORK; EPISODIC EVENT; FELID; HABITAT CONSERVATION; LAND MANAGEMENT; PERCEPTION; POPULATION DECLINE; PUBLIC SPACE; REGULATORY APPROACH;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLICATION; PUMA; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENDANGERED SPECIES; FLORIDA; NEWSPAPERS; PUBLIC OPINION; PUMA;

FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA; PUMA CONCOLOR CORYI;

EID: 84856349994     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01750.x     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Boykoff, M. T., and R. Rajan 2007. Signals and noise. EMBO Reports 8:207-211.
2. Burgess, J., and J. R. Gold, editors, 1985. Geography, the media and popular culture. St. Martins Press, New York.
3. Callaghan, K., and F. Schnell 2001. Assessing the democratic debate: how the news media frame elite policy discourse. Political Communication 18:183-213.
4. Carbyn, L. D., S. H. Fritts, and D. R. Seip, editors. 1995. Ecology and conservation of wolves in a changing world. Occasional publication 35. Canadian Circumpolar Institute, Edmonton Canada
5. Clarke, T. W., P. C. Paquet, and A. P. Curlee 1996. Large carnivore conservation in the Rocky Mountains of the United States and Canada. Conservation Biology 10:936-939.
6. Clayton, S., and G. Meyer 2009. Conservation psychology: understanding and promoting human care for nature. Wiley-Blackwell, Boston
7. Conforti, V. A., and F. C. C. de Azevedo 2003. Local perceptions of jaguars (Panthera onca) and pumas (Puma concolor) in the Iguacu National Park area, south Brazil. Conservation Biology 111:215-221.
8. Corbett, J. B. 1995. When wildlife make the news: an analysis of rural and urban north-central U.S. newspapers. Public Understanding of Science 4:397-410.
9. Corbett, J. B. 2006. Communicating nature: how we create and understand environmental messages. Island Press, Washington, D.C
10. Cougar Management Guidelines Working Group. 2005. Cougar management guidelines. WildFutures, Bainbridge Island, Washington.
11. de Vreese, C., and H. Boomgaarden 2003. Valenced news frames and public support for the EU. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research 28:361-381.
12. Einsiedel, E. F. 1992. Framing science and technology in the Canadian press. Public Understanding of Science 1:89-101.
13. Enserink, M., and G. Vogel 2006. Wildlife conservation: the carnivore comeback. Science 314:746-749.
14. Entman, R. M. 1993. Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 41:51-58.
15. Fazio J. R., D. L. Gilbert, and D. Lowe 2001. Public relations and communications for natural resource managers. Kendall Hunt Publishing, Dubuque, Iowa
16. Gamson, W. A., and A. Modigliani 1987. The changing culture of affirmative action. Research in Political Sociology 3:137-177.
17. Gold, D., and J. Simmons 1965. News selection patterns among Iowa dailies. Public Opinion Quarterly 29:425-430.
18. Gore, M. L., W. F. Siemer, J. E. Shanahan, D. Schuefele, and D. J. Decker 2005. Effects on risk perception of media coverage of a black bear-related human fatality. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33:507-516.
19. Gore, M. L., R. S. Wilson, S. Robyn, W. F. Siemer, H. W. Hudenko, C. E. Clarke, P. S. Hart, L. A. Maguire, B. Muter 2009. Application of risk concepts to wildlife management: special issue introduction. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 14:301-313.
20. Gusset, M., A. H. Maddock, G. J. Gunther, M. Szykman, R. Slotow, M. Walters, and M. J. Somers 2008. Conflicting human interests over the re-introduction of endangered wild dogs in South Africa. Biodiversity and Conservation 17:83-101.
21. Hedrick, J. B. 2006. A content analysis of editorial regionalism in the 1960s: midsize newspaper coverage of New York Times v. Sullivan (1960-1964). PhD dissertation. Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio
22. Holsti, O. R. 1969. Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts
23. Hook, R. A., and W. L. Robinson 1982. Attitudes of Michigan citizens toward predators. Pages 382-394 in F. H. Harrington and P. C. Paquet, editors. Wolves of the world. Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, New Jersey
24. Hurlbert, S. H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54:187-211.
25. Inskip, C., and A. Zimmerman 2009. Human-felid conflict: a review of patterns and priorities worldwide. Oryx 43:18-34.
26. Iyengar, S. 1991. Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
27. Jacobson, S. K. 2009. Communication skills for conservation professionals. 2nd edition. Island Press, Washington, D.C
28. Jacobson, S. K., M. D. McDuff, and M. C. Monroe 2007. Promoting conservation through the arts: outreach for hearts and minds. Conservation Biology 21:7-10.
29. Jerit, J. 2006. Reform, rescue, or run out of money? Problem definition in the Social Security reform debate. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 11:9-28.
30. Kaczensky, P. 2003. Is coexistence possible? Public opinion of large carnivores in the Alps and Dinaric Mountains. Pages 59-89 in B. Krystufek, B. Flajsman, H. I. Griffith, editors. Living with bears: a large carnivore in a shrinking world. Ecological Forum of the Liberal Democracy of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
31. Kahneman, D., and A. Tyersky 1984. Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist 39:341-350.
32. Kaid, L. L., and A. J. Wadsworth 1989. Content analysis. Pages 197-215 in P. Emmert and L. L. Baker, editors. Measurement of communication behavior. Longman, White Plains, New York
33. Karanth, U., and R. Chellam 2009. Carnivore conservation at the crossroads. Oryx 257:2287-2295.
34. Kellert, S. R., M. Black, C. Rush, and A. Bath 1996. Human culture and large carnivore conservation in North America. Conservation Biology 10:977-990.
35. Kleiman, D. G. 1989. Reintroduction of captive mammals for conservation. BioScience 39:152-161.
36. Kleiven, J., T. Bjerke, and B. P. Kaltenborn 2004. Factors influencing the social acceptability of large carnivore behaviours. Biodiversity and Conservation 13:1647-1658.
37. Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 2nd edition. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California
38. Langin, C. 2007. Quantitative study of public support for Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi) recovery. MS thesis. University of Florida, Gainesville
39. Lemelin, R. H. 2008. Doubting Thomases and the cougar: the perceptions of puma management in Northern Ontario, Canada. Sociologia Ruralis 49:56-69.
40. Mazur, A. 1998. Global environmental change in the news: 1987-90 vs. 1992-6. International Sociology 13:457-472.
41. McBride, R. T., R. T. McBride, R. M. McBride, and C. E. McBride 2008. Counting pumas by categorizing physical evidence. Southeastern Naturalist 7:381-400.
42. McClelland, G. H., W. D. Schulze, and B. Hurd 1990. The effects of risk beliefs on property values: a case study of a hazardous waste site. Risk Analysis 10:485-497.
43. McCombs, M. E., and D. L. Shaw 1972. The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36:176-185.
44. Messmer, T. A., Reiter, D., and B. C. West 2001. Enhancing wildlife sciences' linkage to public policy: lessons from the predator-control pendulum. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:1253-1259.
45. Muter, B. A., M. I. Gore, and S. J. Riley 2009. From victim to perpetrator: evolution of risk frames related to human-cormorant conflict in the Great Lakes. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 14:366-379.
46. Nelson, F. 2009. Developing payments for ecosystem services approaches to carnivore conservation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 14:381-392.
47. Neuendorf, K. A. 2002. A content analysis guidebook. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California
48. Primack, R. 2010. Essentials of conservation biology. 5th edition. Sinauer, Stamford, Connecticut
49. Reese, S. D., and J. Ballinger 2001. Roots of a sociology of news: remembering Mr. Gates and social control in the newsroom. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 78:641-658.
50. Riffe, D., S. Lacy, and F. G. Fico 1998. Analyzing media messages: using quantitative content analysis in research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mawah, New Jersey
51. Riley, S. J., and D. J. Decker 2000. Wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity for cougars in Montana. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28:931-939.
52. Semetko, H. A., and P. M. Valkenburg 2000. Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication 50:93-109.
53. Shrestha, R. K., J. R. R. Alavalapati, A. Seidl, K.E. Weber, and T. B. Suselo 2006. Estimating the local cost of protecting Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal: a contingent valuation approach. Environment, Development, and Sustainability 9:413-426.
54. Siemer, W. F., D. J. Decker, and J. Shanahan 2007. Media frames for black bear management stories during issue emergence in New York. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 12:89-100.
55. Spector, M., and J. Kitsuse 1977. Constructing social problems. Cummings, Menlo Park, California
56. Stamm, K. R., F. Clark, and P. R. Eblacas 2000. Mass communication and public understanding of environmental problems: the case of global warming. Public Understanding of Science 9:219-237.
57. Stone, G. 1987. Examining newspapers: what research reveals about America's newspapers. Sage, Newbury Park, California
58. Tichenor, P. J., C. N. Olien, and P. J. Tichnenor 1980. Community conflict and the press. Sage, Beverly Hills, California
59. Treves, A., and U. Karanth 2003. Human-carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore management worldwide. Conservation Biology 17:1491-1499.
60. Treves, A., R. Wallace, and S. White 2009. Participatory planning of interventions to mitigate human-carnivore conflicts. Conservation Biology 23:1577-1587.
61. Trumbo, C. 1996. Constructing climate change: claims and frames in US news coverage of an environmental issue. Public Understanding of Science 5:269-283.
62. Turk, J. V. 1986. Information subsidies and media content: a study of public relations influence on the news. Journalism Monographs 100:1-29.
63. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2008. Florida panther recovery plan (Puma concolor coryi), third revision. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta.
64. Vermeer, J. P. 2002. The view from the states: national politics in local newspaper editorials. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland
65. Weaver, D. H., M. McCombs, and D. Shaw 2004. Agenda-setting research: issues, attributes, and influences. Pages 257-282 in L. L. Kaid, editor. Handbook of political communication research. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey
66. White, D. M. 1950. The "gate keeper": a case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly 27:383-390.
67. Wilson, K. M. 1995. Mass media as sources of global warming knowledge. Mass Communications Review 22:75-89.
68. Wolch, J., A. Gullo, and U. Lassiter 1997. Changing attitudes toward California's cougars. Society and Animals 5:95-116.
69. Zucker, H. G. 1978. The variable nature of news media influence. Communication Yearbook 2:225-245.