Visuo-tactile integration in personal space

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 543-553

  Longo, Matthew R ^a,b   Musil, Jason Jiri ^b   Haggard, Patrick ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEMALE; GROUP DYNAMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; SKIN SURFACE; SOMATOSENSORY STIMULATION; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TACTILE STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUO TACTILE INTEGRATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; PERSONAL SPACE; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; TOUCH; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84856335633     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00158     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Arzy, S., Thut, G., Mohr, C., Michel, C. M., & Blanke, O. (2006). Neural basis of embodiment: Distinct contributions of temporoparietal junction and extrastriate body area. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 8074-8081.
2. Avillac, M., Ben Hamed, S., & Duhamel, J. R. (2007). Multisensory integration in the ventral intraparietal area of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 1922-1932.
3. Azañón, E., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2008). Changing reference frames during the encoding of tactile events. Current Biology, 18, 1044-1049.
4. Beis, J. M., Keller, C., Morin, N., Bartolomeo, P., Bernati, T., Chokron, S., et al. (2004). Right spatial neglect after left hemisphere stroke: Qualitative and quantitative study. Neurology, 63, 1600-1605.
5. Bisiach, E., Perani, D., Vallar, G., & Berti, A. (1986). Unilateral neglect: Personal and extrapersonal. Neuropsychologia, 24, 759-767.
6. Blanke, O., Landis, T., Spinelli, L., & Seeck, M. (2004). Out-of-body experience and autoscopy of neurological origin. Brain, 127, 243-258.
7. Blanke, O., Mohr, C., Michel, C. M., Pascual-Leone, A., Brugger, P., Seeck, M., et al. (2005). Linking out-of-body experience and self processing to mental own-body imagery at the temporoparietal junction. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 550-557.
8. Blanke, O., Ortigue, S., Landis, T., & Seeck, M. (2002). Stimulating illusory own-body perceptions. Nature, 419, 269-270.
9. Cardini, F., Longo, M. R., & Haggard, P. (2011). Vision of the body modulates somatosensory intracortical inhibition. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 325-330.
10. Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S. A., & Galambos, R. (1975). Stimulus novelty, task relevance, and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 39, 131-143.
11. Critchley, M. (1953). The parietal lobes. London: Edward Arnold & Co.
12. Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9-21.
13. di Pellegrino, G., Làdavas, E., & Farnè, A. (1997). Seeing where your hands are.Nature, 388, 730.
14. Downar, J., Crawley, A. P., Mikulis, D. J., & Davis, K. D. (2000). A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment. Nature euroscience, 3, 277-283.
15. Duhamel, J.-R., Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1998). Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: Congruent visual and somatic response properties. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 126-136.
16. Eimer, M., & Driver, J. (2000). An event-related brain potential study of cross-modal links in spatial attention between vision and touch. Psychophysiology, 37, 697-705.
17. Ernst, M. O., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 162-169.
18. Forster, B., & Pavone, E. F. (2008). Electrophysiological correlates of crossmodal visual distractor congruency effects: Evidence for response conflict. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 65-73.
19. Ghazanfar, A. A., & Schroeder, C. E. (2006). Is neocortex essentially multisensory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 278-285.
20. Gondan, M., Niederhaus, B., Rösler, F., & Röder, B. (2005). Multisensory processing in the redundant-target effect: A behavioral and event-related potential study. Perception and Psychophysics, 67, 713-726.
21. Graziano, M. S. A., Cooke, D. F., & Taylor, C. S. (2000). Coding the location of the arm by sight. Science, 290, 1782-1786.
22. Guariglia, C., & Antonucci, G. (1992). Personal and extrapersonal space: A case of neglect dissociation. Neuropsychologia, 30, 1001-1009.
23. Iriki, A., Tanaka, M., & Iwamura, Y. (1996). Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurons. NeuroReport, 7, 2325-2330.
24. Jung, T.-P., Makeig, S., Humphries, C., Lee, T.-W., McKeown, M. J., Iragui, V., et al. (2000). Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology, 37, 163-178.
25. Kammers, M. P. M., Longo, M. R., Tsakiris, M., Dijkerman, H. C., & Haggard, P. (2009). Specificity and coherence of body representations. Perception, 38, 1804-1820.
26. Kennett, S., Eimer, M., Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2001). Tactile-visual links in exogenous spatial attention under different postures: Convergent evidence from psychophysics and ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 462-478.
27. Leube, D. T., Knoblich, G., Erb, M., Grodd, W., Bartels, M., & Kircher, T. T. (2003). The neural correlates of perceiving ones own movements. Neuroimage, 20, 2084-2090.
28. Longo, M. R., Betti, V., Aglioti, S. M., & Haggard, P. (2009). Visually induced analgesia: Seeing the body reduces pain. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 12125-12130.
29. Longo, M. R., Pernigo, S., & Haggard, P. (2011). Vision of the body modulates processing in primary somatosensory cortex. Neuroscience Letters, 489, 159-163.
30. Macaluso, E., & Driver, J. (2005). Multisensory spatial interactions: A window onto functional integration in the human brain. Trends in Neurosciences, 28, 264-271.
31. Makin, T. R., Holmes, N. P., & Zohary, E. (2007). Is that near my hand? Multisensory representation of peripersonal space in human intraparietal sulcus. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 731-740.
32. Matsuhashi, M., Ikeda, A., Ohara, S., Matsumoto, R., Yamamoto, J., Takayama, M., et al. (2004). Multisensory convergence at human temporo-parietal junction-Epicortical recording of evoked responses. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 1145-1160.
33. Meredith, M. A., & Stein, B. E. (1983). Interactions among converging sensory inputs in the superior colliculus. Science, 221, 389-391.
34. Meredith, M. A., & Stein, B. E. (1986). Spatial factors determine the activity of multisensory neurons in cat superior colliculus. Brain Research, 365, 350-354.
35. Mouraux, A., & Iannetti, G. (2009). Nociceptive laser-evoked brain potentials do not reflect nociceptive-specific neural activity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 101, 3258-3269.
36. Murray, M. M., Molholm, S., Michel, C. M., Heslenfeld, D. J., Ritter, W., Javitt, D. C., et al. (2005). Grabbing your ear: Rapid auditory-somatosensory multisensory interactions in low-level sensory cortices are not constrained by stimulus alignment. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 963-974.
37. Papeo, L., Longo, M. R., Feurra, M., & Haggard, P. (2010). The role of the right temporoparietal junction in intersensory conflict: Detection or resolution? Experimental Brain Research, 206, 129-139.
38. Ramachandran, V. S., & Rogers-Ramachandran, D. (1996). Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 263, 377-386.
39. Ramachandran, V. S., Rogers-Ramachandran, D., & Cobb, S. (1995). Touching the phantom limb. Nature, 377, 489-490.
40. Rock, I., & Victor, J. (1964). Vision and touch: An experimentally created conflict between the two senses. Science, 143, 594-596.
41. Sambo, C. F., & Forster, B. (2009). An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: Evidence for the spatial rule. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1550-1559.
42. Schürmann, M, Kolev, V., Menzel, K., & Yordanova, J. (2002). Spatial coincidence modulates interactions between visual and somatosensory evoked potentials. NeuroReport, 13, 779-783.
43. Simon-Dack, S. L., Cummings, S. E., Reetz, D. J., Alvarez-Vazquez, E., Gu, H., & Teder-Sälejärvi, W. A. (2009). "Touched" by light: Event-related potentials (ERPs) to visuo-haptic stimuli in peri-personal space. Brain Topography, 21, 261-268.
44. Spence, C, Nicholls, M. E., Gillespie, N., & Driver, J. (1998). Cross-modal links in exogenous covert spatial orienting between touch, audition, and vision. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 544-557.
45. Squires, N. K., Squires, K. C, & Hillyard, S. A. (1975). Two variables of long latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 38, 387-401.
46. Stein, B. E., & Meredith, M. A. (1993). The merging of the senses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J., John, E. R. (1965). Evoked potentials correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science, 150, 1187-1188.
48. Teder-Sälejärvi, W. A., Di Russo, F., McDonald, J. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (2005). Effects of spatial congruity on audio-visual multimodal integration. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1396-1409.
49. Tsakiris, M., Costantini, M., & Haggard, P. (2008). The role of the right temporo-parietal junction in maintaining a coherent sense of one's body. Neuropsychologia, 46, 3014-3018.
50. Yamaguchi, S., & Knight, R. T. (1991). Anterior and posterior association cortex contributions to the somatosensory P300. Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 2039-2054.
51. Yeung, N., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 111, 931-959.
52. Zacks, J., Rypma, B., Gabriel, J., Tversky, B., & Glover, G (1999). Imagined transformations of bodies: An fMRI investigation. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1029-1040.