REDD+ governance

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 107-113

  Lederer, Markus ^a  

^a DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON; DEFORESTATION;

GOVERNANCE MECHANISMS; INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY; LEGAL ISSUES; REDUCING EMISSIONS;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

EID: 84856329718     PISSN: 17577780     EISSN: 17577799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcc.155     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Le Quéré C, Raupach MR, Canadell JG, Marland G. Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Nat Geosci 2009, 2:831-836.
2. Harvey F. Worst ever carbon emissions leave climate on the brink. The Guardian, 2011.
3. IPCC. The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
4. FAO. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 Main Report. Rome: FAO; 2010.
5. 2 emissions from forest loss. Nat Geosci 2009, 2:737-738.
6. Stern N. The Economics of Climate Change. The Stern Review. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
7. Eliasch J. Eliasch Review: Climate Change: Financing Global Forests. London: Office of the Prime Minister; 2008.
8. Corbera E, Schroeder H. Governing and Implementing REDD+. Environ Sci Policy 2011, 14:89-99.
9. Angelsen A. Moving Ahead with REDD. Issues, Options and Implications. Bogor: CIFOR; 2008.
10. Angelsen A. Realising REDD+. National Strategy and Policy Options. Bogor: CIFOR; 2009.
11. Seymour F, Forward E. Governing Sustainable forest management in the new climate regime. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 2010, 1:803-810.
12. Herold M, Skutsch MM. Measurement, reporting and verification for REDD+. Objectives, capacities and institutions. In: Angelsen A, ed. Realising REDD+ National Strategy and Policy Options. Bogor: CIFOR; 2009.
13. McKenzie F, Childress A. The Role of Terrestrial Carbon in the Climate Change Solution. Where, Why and How-A Short Guide. The Terrestrial Carbon Group Project; 2009.
14. Wertz-Kanounnikoff S, Verchot LV, Kanninen M, Murdiyarso D. How do we monitor, report and verify carbon emissions from forests. In: Angelsen A, ed. Moving Ahead with REDD Issies, Options and Implications. Bangor: CIFOR; 2008, 87-98.
15. Lederer M. From CDM to REDD+ what do we know for setting up effective and legitimate carbon governance. Ecol Econ 2011, 70:1900-1907.
16. Hoffmann MJ. Climate Governance at the Crossroads. Experimenting with a Global Response after Kyoto. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
17. United Nations. Submission by the Governments of Papua New Guinea & Costa Rica; 2005.
18. United Nations. Report of the Conferences of the Parties on its thirteenth session, held in Bali from 3 to 15 December 2007 (Bali Action Plan), 2007.
19. UNFCCC. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its sixteenth session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 10. In: FCCC/CP/2010/Add1. UNFCCC: Cancun, 2010.
20. Davis C, Williams A, Goers L, Daviet F, Lupberger S. A Review of the World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Readiness Proposals. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute; 2010.
21. Wertz-Kanounnikoff S, Kongphan-Apirak M. Emerging REDD+. A Preliminary Survey of Demonstration and Readiness Activities. Bogor: CIFOR; 2009.
22. Biermann F, Pattberg P, Asselt HV, Zelli F. The fragmentation of global governance architectures: a framework for analysis. Global Environ Polit 2009, 9:14-40.
23. Zelli F. The fragmentation of the global climate governance architecture. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 2011, 2:255-270.
24. Keohane RO, Victor DG. The regime complex for climate change. Perspect Polit 2011, 9:7-23.
25. McKinsey & Company. Pathways to a Low-Carbon Economy. Version 2 of the Global Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Curve. McKinsey & Company; 2009.
26. Dyer N, Counsell S. McREDD: How McKinsey 'cost-curves' are distorting REDD. Climate and Forests Policy Brief. London: Rainforest Foundation UK; 2010.
27. Corbera E, Estrada M, Brown K. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries: revisiting the assumptions. Climatic Change 2010, 100:355-388.
28. Bond I, Grieg-Gran M, Wertz-Kanounnikoff S, Hazlewood P, Wunder S, Angelsen A. Incentives to Sustain Forest Ecosystem Services: A Review and Lessons for REDD. Natural Resource Issues No. 16. London: Institute for Environment and Development; 2009.
29. World Bank. State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2011. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2011.
30. IDEAcarbon. Assessing the Financial Flows for REDD+: The Pledge-Implementation Gap. Research Note. Douglas: IDEAcarbon; 2011.
31. Pistorius T, Schmitt CB, Benick D, Entenmann S. Greening REDD+: Challenges and Opportunities for Forest Biodiversity Conservation. Freiburg: University of Freiburg; 2010.
32. Rayner J, Buck A, Katila P. Embracing complexity: Meeting the challenges of international forest governance. A global assessment report. IUFRO World Series volume 28. Vienna: International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO), 2010.
33. Sunderlin WD, Larson AM, Croncleton P. Forest tenure rights and REDD+: from inertia to policy solutions. In: Angelsen A, ed. Realising REDD+ National Strategy and Policy Options. Bogor: CIFOR; 2009, 139-150.
34. Lyster R. REDD+, transparency, participation and resource rights: the role of law. Environ Sci Policy 2011, 14:118-126.
35. Colchester M. Justice in the Forest: Rural Livelihoods and Forest Law Enforcement. Forest Perspectives. Bogor: CIROR, 2006.
36. Caldas MM, Simmons C, Walker R, Perz S, Aldrich S, Pereira R, Leite F, Arima E. Settlement formation and land cover and land use change: a case study in the Braziian Amazon. J Lat Am Geogr 2010, 9:125-144.
37. Bofin P, du Preez M-L, Standing A, Williams A. REDD integrity. Addressing governance and corruption challenges in schemes for reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD). U4Report 2011 No.1. U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre Chr. Michelsen Institute, 2011.
38. Transparency International. Global Corruption Report: Climate Change. Berlin: Transparency International; 2011.
39. Tacconi L, Downs F, Larmour P. Anit-corruption policies in the forest sector and REDD+. In: Angelsen A, ed. Realising REDD+ National Strategy and Policy Options. Bogor: CIFOR; 2009. 163-174.
40. Peskett L, Hubermann D, Bowen-Jones E, Edwards G, Brown J. Making REDD Work for the Poor. A Poverty Environment Partnership Report. London: ODI; 2008.
41. Ebeling J, Yasue M. Generating carbon finance through avoided deforestation and its potential to create climatic, conservation and human development benefits. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Biol Sci 2008, 363: 1917-1924.
42. Schmidt L. Draft Version: Broadening the Horizon- Assessing REDD from an Integrated Perspective. A Discussion Paper. Bonn: German Development Institute; 2008.
43. Witness G. Vested Interests. Industrial Logging and Carbon in Tropical Forests. Washington, DC: Global Witness; 2009.
44. Luttrell C, Peskett L, Schreckenberg K. The potential of carbon finance for pro-poor community forestry. ODI Forestry Briefing 15. London: Overseas Development Institute; 2007.
45. Kindermann G, Obersteiner M, Sohngen B, Sathaye J, Andrasko K, Rametsteiner E, Schlamadinger B, Wunder S, Beach R. Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:10302-10307.
46. Lubowski R. What are the costs and potentials for REDD? In: Angelsen A, ed. Moving Ahead with REDD. Bogor: CIFOR; 2008, 23-30.
47. Boucher D. Out of the Woods. A Realistic Role for Tropical Forests in Curbing Global Warming. Washington, DC: Union of Concerned Scientists; 2008.
48. Leach P. Carbon Sunk? The Potential Impacts of Avoided Deforestation Credits on Emissions Trading Mechanisms. London: Rainforest Foundation UK; 2008.
49. Karousakis K. Incentives to Reduce GHG Emissions from Deforestation: Lessons Learned from Costa Rica and Mexico. Paris: OECD; 2007.
50. Anger N, Sathaye J. Reducing Deforestation and Trading Emissions: Economic Implications for the Post-Kyoto Carbon Market. Mannheim: Centre for European Economic Research; 2008.
51. Vatn A, Vedeld P. Getting Ready! A Study on National Governance Structures for REDD+. Noragric Report No. 59. Oslo: Norwegian University of Life Sciences; 2011.
52. Hare B, Macey K. Tropical Deforestation Emission Reduction Mechanism: A Discussion Paper. Amsterdam: Greenpeace; 2007.
53. Bäckstrand K, Lövbrand E. Planting trees to mitigate climate change: contested discourses of ecological modernization, green governmentality and civic environmentalism. Global Environ Polit 2006, 6:50-75.
54. Corbera E, Brown K, Adger NW. The equity and legitimacy of markets for ecosystem services. Dev Change 2007, 38:587-613.
55. Cotula L, Mayers J. Tenure in REDD. Start-point or Afterthought. London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED); 2009.
56. Ostrom E. Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
57. Schroeder H. Agency in International Climate Negotiations: the case of indigenous peoples and avoided deforestation. Int Environ Agree Polit Law Econ 2010, 10: 317-332.
58. Saunders J, Reeve R. Monitoring Governance for Implementation of REDD+. Background paper one for Monitoring Governance Safeguards in REDD+ Expert Workshop. London: Chatham House, 2010.
59. Thompson I, Mackey B, McNulty S, Mosseler A. Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, and Climate change. A synthesis of the biodiversity/resilience/stability relationship in forest ecosystems. Technical Series No. 43. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2009.
60. Locatelli B, Evans V, Wardell A, Andrade A, Vignola R. Forests and climate change in Latin America: linking adaptation and mitigation. Forests 2011, 2:431-450.
61. Davis C, Daviet F. Investing in Results: Enhancing Coordination for More Effective Interim REDD+ Financing. WRI Working Paper. Washingon, DC: World Resources Institute; 2010.
62. Irawan S, Tacconi L. Reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD) and decentralized forest management. Int Forest Rev 2009, 11:427-438.
63. Fuhr H. The Seven Traps of Decentralization. Potsdam Seminar Brief, No. 2. University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany, 2006.
64. Sandbrook R, Nelson F, Adams WM, Agrawal A. Carbon, forests and the REDD paradox. Oryx 2010, 44: 330-334.
65. Phelps J, Webb EL, Agrawal A. Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance? Science 2010, 328: 312-313.
66. Kanninen M, Murdiyarso D, Seymour F, Angelsen A, Wunder S, German L. Do trees grow on money? The implications of deforestation research for policies to promote REDD. Bogor: CIFOR; 2007.
67. Peskett L. Is REDD+ an Opportunity to Support Climate Compatible Development in Developing Countries. Climate & Development Knowledge Network Policy Brief. London: ODI; 2010.