Robotic partial nephrectomy: Development and advantages;Développement de la néphrectomie partielle robotisée: Avantages

Revue Medicale Suisse

Volumn 7, Issue 320, 2011, Pages 2410-2413

  De Gorski, A ^a   Iselin, C E ^a  

^a HUG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER SURGERY; CONVALESCENCE; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEPHRECTOMY; NEPHRON SPARING SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; ROBOTIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; SHORT SURVEY; TUMOR VOLUME; ARTICLE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; ROBOTICS;

HUMANS; NEPHRECTOMY; ROBOTICS;

EID: 84856302553     PISSN: 16609379     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Short Survey

References (15)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:71-96.
2. Patard JJ, Rodriguez A, Rioux-Leclercq N, et al. Prognostic significance of the mode of detection in renal tumours. BJU Int 2002;90:358-63. (Pubitemid 36124764)
3. Kato M, Suzuki T, Suzuki Y, et al. Natural history of small renal cell carcinoma: Evaluation of growth rate, histological grade, cell proliferation and apoptosis. J Urol 2004;172:863-6. (Pubitemid 39096408)
4. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, et al. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1296-305.
5. Weight CJ, Larson BT, Fergany AF, et al. Nephrectomy induced chronic renal insufficiency is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death and death from any cause in patients with localized cT1b renal masses. J Urol 2010;183:1317-23.
6. European association of urology 2010. Guidelines on renal cell carcinome. www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/09-Renal-Cell-Carcinoma%202010.pdf
7. Porpiglia F, Volpe A, Billia M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy: Analysis of the current literature. Eur Urol 2008;53:732- 42;discussion 742-3.
8. Gong EM, Orvieto MA, Zorn KC, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy in clinical T1a renal tumors. J J Endourol 2008;22:953-7. (Pubitemid 351693933)
9. Ahlering TE, Woo D, Eichel L, et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: A comparison of one surgeon's outcomes. Urology 2004;63:819-22. (Pubitemid 38596655)
10. Menon M, Kaul S, Bhandari A, et al. Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: A questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques. J Urol 2005;174:2291-6. (Pubitemid 41611806)
11. Deane LA, Lee HJ, Box GN, et al. Robotic versus standard laparoscopic partial/wedge nephrectomy: A comparison of intraoperative and perioperative results from a single institution. J Endourol 2008;22:947-52. (Pubitemid 351693945)
12. Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: An international experience. Eur Urol 2010;57:815-20.
13. Scoll BJ, Uzzo RG, Chen DY, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: A large single-institutional experience. Urology 2010;75:1328-34.
14. Spana G, Haber GP, Dulabon LM, et al. Complications after robotic partial nephrectomy at centers of excellence: Multi-institutional analysis of 450 cases. J Urol 2011;186:417-21.
15. Wang AJ, Bhayani SB. Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: Single-surgeon analysis of > 100 consecutive procedures. Urology 2009;73:306-10.