Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation (NIMV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in weaning from mechanical ventilation in preterm infants

Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences

Volumn 21, Issue 84, 2011, Pages 113-120

  Abyar, Hossein ^a   Ghafari, Vajiheh ^a   Nakhshab, Maryam ^a   Jafari, Masoumeh ^a   Rahimi, Narjes ^a   Asadpour, Suzan ^a  

^a MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP); Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation (NIMV); Preterm infant

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856299005     PISSN: 17359279     EISSN: 17359260     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Moretti C, Luigi G, Fassi C. Nasal flow synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation to facilitate weaning in very low birthweight infants: Unmasked randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Int 2008; 50(1): 85-91.
2. Goldsmith J, Karotkin E. Assisted ventilation of the neonate. 4th ed. New York: Saunders, 2003.
3. Hutchison AA, Bignall S. Non invasive positive pressure ventilation in the preterm neonate: reducing endotrauma and the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal 2008; 93(1): 64-68.
4. Peak M, Dillon P. Randomized trial of continuous positive airways pressure to prevent reventilation in preterm infants. Pediat Pulmonol 2005; 39(3): 247-250.
5. Khalaf MN, Brodsky N, Hurley J. A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation. Pediatrics 2001; 108(1): 13-17.
6. Brent R, Li M, Metcalfe D. Nasal ventilation alters mesenchymal cell turnover and improves alveolarization in preterm lambs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 178(4): 407-418.
7. Bisceglia M, Belcastro A, Poerio V. A comparison of nasal intermittent versus continuous positive pressure delivery for the treatment of moderate respiratory syndrome in preterm infants. Minerva Pediatr 2007; 59(2): 91-95.
8. Kugelman A, Feferkorn I, Riskin A. Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Pediatr 2007; 150(5): 521-526.
9. Barrington KJ, Bull D, Finer NN. Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2001; 107(1): 638-641.
10. Robert M. Kliegman, Behrman RE, Jenson HB, Stanton B. Nelson textbook of pediatrics. 18th ed. Germany: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2007.
11. Friedlich P, Lecart C, Posen R, Friedlich PH, Lecart Ch, Posen R, et al. A Randomized Trial of Nasopharyngeal Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation Versus Nasopharyngeal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Very Low Birth Weight Infants After Extubation. J Perinatol 1999; 19(6): 413-418.
12. Khorana M, Paradeevisut H, Sangtawesin V, Kanjanapatanakul W, Chotigeat U, Ayutthaya JK, et al. A randomized trial of nonsynchronized Nasopharyngeal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (nsNIMV) vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) in the prevention of extubation failure in pre-term < 1,500 grams. J Med Assoc Thai 2008; 91(3): S136-142.