Cosmetics and function: Quality-of-Life changes after rhinoplasty surgery

Laryngoscope

Volumn 122, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 254-259

  Saleh, Amy M ^a   Younes, Ahmed ^a   Friedman, Oren ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Cosmetic techniques; external nose; Level of Evidence: 2b; nasal cavities; reconstructive surgical procedures; rhinoplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ESTHETICS; FACIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MCNEMAR TEST; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; NOSE OBSTRUCTION; NOSE RECONSTRUCTION; OSTEOTOMY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; STUDENT T TEST; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYMPTOMATOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NASAL OBSTRUCTION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RHINOPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84856265422     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: 15314995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/lary.22390     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Meningaud JP, Lantieri L, Bertrand JC,. Rhinoplasty: an outcome research. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 251-257.
2. McKiernan DC, Banfield G, Kumar R, et al. Patient benefit from functional and cosmetic rhinoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2001; 26: 50-52. (Pubitemid 32221745)
3. Stewart EJ, Robinson K, Wilson JA,. Assessment of patient's benefit from rhinoplasty. Rhinology 1996; 34: 57-59. (Pubitemid 26155384)
4. Baumann I,. Quality of life before and after septoplasty and rhinoplasty [in German]. Laryngorhinootologie 2010; 89 (Suppl 1): S35-S45.
5. Alsarraf R, Larrabee WF Jr, Anderson S, et al. Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: a pilot study. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2001; 3: 198-201.
6. Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, et al. Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130: 157-163. (Pubitemid 38292176)
7. Dolan RW,. Minimally invasive nasal valve repair: an evaluation using the NOSE scale. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 136: 292-295.
8. Spielmann PM, White PS, Hussain SS,. Surgical techniques for the treatment of nasal valve collapse: a systematic review. Laryngoscope 2009; 119: 1281-1290.
9. Hellings PW, Nolst Trenite GJ,. Long-term patient satisfaction after revision rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 2007; 117: 985-989. (Pubitemid 46869832)
10. Most SP,. Analysis of outcomes after functional rhinoplasty using a disease-specific quality-of-life instrument. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006; 8: 306-309. (Pubitemid 44497415)
11. Guyuron B, Bokhari F,. Patient satisfaction following rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1996; 20: 153-157. (Pubitemid 26123045)
12. Faris C, Koury E, Kothari P, et al. Functional rhinoplasty with batten and spreader grafts for correction of internal nasal valve incompetence. Rhinology 2006; 44: 114-117. (Pubitemid 43862936)
13. Rhee JS, Poetker DM, Smith TL, et al. Nasal valve surgery improves disease-specific quality of life. Laryngoscope 2005; 115: 437-440. (Pubitemid 40327988)
14. Islam A, Arslan N, Felek SA, et al. Reconstruction of the internal nasal valve: modified splay graft technique with endonasal approach. Laryngoscope 2008; 118: 1739-1743.
15. Stewart MG, Smith TL, Weaver EM, et al. Outcomes after nasal septoplasty: results from the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130: 283-290. (Pubitemid 38451386)
16. Alsarraf R,. Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery: a review and new directions. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2000; 24: 192-197. (Pubitemid 30448117)
17. Apaydin F,. Rhinoplasty at the global crossroads. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2009; 11: 421-423.