Robotic-assisted surgery in the management of endometrial cancer

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-8

  Holloway, Robert W ^a,b   Ahmad, Sarfraz ^a  

^a FLORIDA HOSPITAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost; Endometrial cancer; Hysterectomy; Lymphadenectomy; Obesity; Robotic surgery

Indexed keywords

AORTIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; DA VINCI SURGERY; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OBESITY; OPERATING ROOM; PELVIS LYMPHADENECTOMY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; ROBOTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84856261007     PISSN: 13418076     EISSN: 14470756     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01744.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Lewin SN. Revised FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2011; 54: 215-218.
2. Panici PB, Basile S, Maneschi F et al. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008; 100: 1707-1716.
3. The Writing Committee on Behalf of the ASTEC Study Group. Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomized study. Lancet 2009; 373: 125-136.
4. Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Cohn DE. Lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: the controversy. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 117: 6-8.
5. Creasman WT, Mutch DE, Herzog TJ. ASTEC lymphadenectomy and radiation therapy studies: are conclusions valid? Gynecol Oncol 2010; 116: 293-294.
6. Childers JM, Brzechffa PR, Hatch KD et al. Laparoscopically assisted surgical staging (LASS) of endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1993; 51: 33-38. (Pubitemid 23339260)
7. Childers JM, Childers JM, Hatch KD, Tran AN, Surwit EA. Laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 741-747. (Pubitemid 23312180)
8. Thoma V, Salvatores M, Mereu L, Chua I, Wattiez A. Laparoscopic hysterectomy; technique, indications. Ann Urol (Paris) 2007; 41: 80-90.
9. Leiserowitz GS, Xing GB, Parikh-Patel A et al. Survival of endometrial cancer patients after laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy or total abdominal hysterectomy; analysis of risk factors. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 104 (Suppl 1): A7.
10. Naumann RW, Coleman RL. The use of adjuvant radiation therapy in early endometrial cancer by members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists in 2005. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 105: 7-12. (Pubitemid 46441451)
11. Rakowski JA, Radi MJ, Ahmad S, Brudie LA, James JA, Holloway RW. Does uterine manipulator affect cervical cancer pathology or identification of lymphovascular space involvement? Gynecol Oncol 2011; 120 (Suppl 1): A60.
12. Kho RM, Akl MN, Cornella JL, Magtibay PM, Wechter ME, Magrina JF. Incidence and characteristics of patients with vaginal cuff dehiscence after robotic procedures. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 231-235.
13. DeNardis SA, Holloway RW, Bigsby GE IV, Pikaart DP, Ahmad S, Finkler NJ. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111: 412-417.
14. Holloway RW, Ahmad S, DeNardis SA et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: analysis of surgical performance. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 115: 447-452.
15. Holloway RW, Ahmad S, Bigsby GE et al. Benchmarking robotic surgical performance: a 4-year analysis of annual perioperative outcomes for patients with endometrial cancer treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and staging lymphadenectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011; 18 (Suppl 1): A528.
16. Gaia G, Holloway RW, Santoro L, Ahmad S, Di Silverio E, Spinillo A. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 1422-1431.
17. Reza M, Maeso S, Blasco JA, Andradas E. Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 1772-1783.
18. Bell MC, Torgeson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Suttle AW, Hunt S. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111: 407-411.
19. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L et al. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 360.e1-360.e9.
20. Cardenas-Goicoechea J, Adams S, Bhat SB, Randall TC. Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at minimally invasive surgical center. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 117: 224-228.
21. Gehrig PA, Cantrell LA, Shafer A, Abaid LN, Mendivil A, Boggess JF. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman? Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111: 41-45.
22. Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Henretta MS et al. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: robotics or laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol 2009; 113: 36-41.
23. Seamon LG, Bryant SA, Rheaume PS et al. Comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer in obese patients: comparing robotics and laparotomy. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 16-21.
24. Veljiovich DS, Paley PJ, Drescher CW, Everett EN, Chirag S, Peters WA. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 679.e1-679.e9. (Discussion 679.e9-10).
25. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 5331-5336.
26. Subramaniam A, Kim KH, Bryant SA et al. A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 122: 604-607.
27. Spirtos NM, Eisekop SM, Boike G et al. Laparoscopic staging in patients with incompletely staged cancers of the uterus, ovary, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneum: a Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1645-1649. (Pubitemid 41540460)
28. Barnett JC, Judd JP, Wu JM, Scales CD, Myers ER, Havrilesky LJ. Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 685-693.
29. Jonsdottir GM, Jorgensen S, Cohen SL et al. Increasing minimally invasive hysterectomy: effect on cost and complications. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 1142-1149.