Mental health professionals' attitudes to partnership in medicine taking: A validation study of the Leeds Attitude to Concordance Scale II

Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 123-129

  De Las Cuevas, Carlos ^a,b   Rivero Santana, Amado ^c   Perestelo Perez, Lilisbeth ^b,d   Perez Ramos, Jeanette ^c   Gonzalez Lorenzo, Marien ^c   Serrano Aguilar, Pedro ^b,d   Sanz, Emilio J ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

^b CIBER EPIDEMIOLOGÍA Y SALUD PÚBLICA CIBERESP   (Spain)

^c Canary Islands Foundation for Health and Research FUNCIS   (Spain)

^d Evaluation Unit of the Canary Islands Health Service SESCS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Concordance; LATCon II; Medicine taking; Partnership; Psychiatrists

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EMPATHY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEED ATTITUDE TO CONCORDANCE SCALE II; MALE; PARTICIPATORY MANAGEMENT; PATERNALISM; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PSYCHIATRIST; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COMMUNICATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEX FACTORS; SPAIN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84856248037     PISSN: 10538569     EISSN: 10991557     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pds.2240     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Edwards A, Elwyn G (eds). Shared decision-making in health care: achieving evidence-based patient choice (2nd edn). Oxford University Press: Oxford, New York, 2009.
2. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 1997; 44: 681-692.
3. Deegan PE, Drake RE. Shared Decision Making and Medication Management in the Recovery Process. Psychiatr Serv 2006; 57: 1636-1639.
4. Marinker M, Blenkinsopp A, Bond C, et al. From compliance to concordance: achieving shared goals in medicine taking. Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain: London, 1997.
5. Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. From Compliance to Concordance: Towards Shared Goals in Medicine Taking. Royal Pharmaceutical Society: London, 1997.
6. Marinker M. Compliance is not all. BMJ 1998; 316: 150-151.
7. Bell JS, Airaksinen MS, Lyles A, et al. Concordance is not synonymous with compliance or adherence. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 64: 710-711.
8. Aronson JK. Compliance, concordance, adherence. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 63: 383-384.
9. Horne R. National Coordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organization (Great Britain): Concordance, adherence and compliance in medicine taking: report for the National Coordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organization R & D (NCCSDO). NCCSDO: London, 2005.
10. Robinson JH, Callister IC, Berry JA, et al. Patient-centered care and adherence: definitions and applications to improve outcomes. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2008; 20: 600-607.
11. Bajramovic J, Emmerton L, Tett SE. Perceptions around concordance - focus groups and semistructured interviews conducted with consumers, pharmacists and general practitioners. Health Expect 2004; 7: 221-234.
12. Cox K, Stevenson F, Britten N, et al. A systematic review of communication between patients and health care professionals about medicine-taking and prescribing. GKT Concordance Unit, King's College London: London, 2002.
13. Hamann J, Leucht S, Kissling W. Shared decision making in psychiatry. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2003; 107: 403-409.
14. Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 487-497.
15. Raynor DK, Thistlethwaite JE, Hart K, et al. Are health professionals ready for the new philosophy of concordance in medicine taking? Int J Pharm Pract 2001; 9: 81-84.
16. Thistlethwaite JE, Raynor DK, Knapp P. Medical students' attitudes towards concordance in medicine taking: exploring the impact of an educational intervention. Educ Health (Abingdon) 2003; 16: 307-317.
17. Knapp P, Raynor DK, Thistlethwaite JE, et al. A questionnaire to measure health practitioners' attitudes to partnership in medicine taking: LATCon II. Health Expect 2009; 12: 175-186.
18. Elwyn G, Miron-Shatz T. Deliberation before determination: the definition and evaluation of good decision making. Health Expect 2010; 13: 139-147.
19. Entwistle VA, Skea ZC, O'Donnell MT. Decisions about treatment: interpretations of two measures of control by women having a hysterectomy. Soc Sci Med 2001; 53: 721-732.
20. Hamman J, Mendel R, Cohen R, et al. Psychiatrists use of Shared Decision Making in the Treatment of Schizophrenia: Patient Characteristics and Decision Topics. Psychiatr Serv 2009; 60: 1107-1112.
21. Hamann J, Cohen R, Leucht S, et al. Do patients with schizophrenia wish to be involved in decisions about their medical treatment? Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162: 2382-2384.
22. Adams JR, Drake RE, Wolford GL. Shared decision making preferences of people with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 2007; 58: 1219-1221.
23. O'Neal EL, Adams JR, McHugo GJ, et al. Preferences of older and younger adults with serious mental illness for involvement in decision-making in medical and psychiatric settings. Am J Geriatric Psychiatry 2008; 16: 826-833.
24. Patel SR, Bakken S. Preferences for participation in decision making among ethnically diverse patients with anxiety and depression. Community Ment Health J 2010; 46: 466-473.
25. Goosensen A, Zijlstra P, Koopmanschap M. Measuring shared decision making processes in psychiatry: Skills versus patient satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns 2007; 67: 50-56.
26. Young HN, Bell RA, Epstein RM, et al. Physicians' shared decision-making behaviors in depression care. AMA Arch Intern Med 2008; 168: 1368-1370.
27. Goss C, Moretti F, Mazzi MA, et al. Involving patients in decisions during psychiatric consultations. Br J Psychiatry 2008; 193: 416-421.
28. Roter DL, Hall JA, Aoki Y. Physician Gender Effects in Medical Communication A Meta-analytic Review. JAMA 2002; 288: 756-764.
29. Bylund CL, Makoul G. Empathic communication and gender in the physician-patient encounter. Patient Educ Couns 2002; 48: 207-216.
30. Cruz M, Pincus HA. Research on the influence that communication in psychiatric encounters has on treatment. Psychiatr Serv 2002; 53: 1253-1265.
31. Gwyn R, Elwyn G. When is a shared decision not (quite) a shared decision? Negotiating preferences in a general practice encounter. Soc Sci Med 1999; 49: 437-447.
32. Braddock CH III, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, et al. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA 1999; 282: 2313-2320.
33. Drake RE, Deegan PE. Shared Decision Making is an Ethical Imperative Psychiatr Serv 2009; 60: 1007.
34. Loh A, Simon D, Henning K, et al. The assessment of depressive patients' involvement in decision making in audio-taped primary care consultations. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 63: 314-318.
35. Towle A, Godolphin W, Grams G, et al. Putting informed and shared decision making into practice. Health Expect 2006; 9: 321-332.