The impact on drug mass flow rate of interrupting and resuming carrier fluid flow: An in vitro study on a very low dead-space volume infusion set

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 114, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 328-332

  Lannoy, Damien ^a,b   Decaudin, Bertrand ^a,b   Simon, Nicolas ^a,b   Barthelemy, Christine ^a   Debaene, Bertrand ^c   Odou, Pascal ^a,b  

^a UNIV LILLE   (France)

^b LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c POITIERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NORADRENALIN;

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CARRIER FLUID FLOW; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG MASS FLOW RATE; EFFLUENT; FLOW RATE; FLUID FLOW; IN VITRO STUDY; INFUSION SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAVENOUS CATHETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROSCOPY;

CATHETERS; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; INFUSION PUMPS; INFUSIONS, PARENTERAL; NOREPINEPHRINE; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY, ULTRAVIOLET; SYRINGES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84856235176     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182373a27     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Decaudin B, Dewulf S, Lannoy D, Simon N, Secq A, Barthelemy C, Debaene B, Odou P. Impact of multiaccess infusion devices on in vitro drug delivery during multi-infusion therapy. Anesth Analg 2009;109:1147-55
2. Crass RE, Vance JR. In vivo accuracy of gravity-flow i.v. infusion systems. Am J Hosp Pharm 1985;42:328-31 (Pubitemid 15162746)
3. Flack FC, Whyte TD. Behaviour of standard gravity-fed administration sets used for intravenous infusion. Br Med J 1974;3:439-43
4. Lovich MA, Doles J, Peterfreund RA. The impact of carrier flow rate and infusion set dead-volume on the dynamics of intravenous drug delivery. Anesth Analg 2005;100:1048-55 (Pubitemid 40404209)
5. Lovich MA, Kinnealley ME, Sims NM, Peterfreund RA. The delivery of drugs to patients by continuous intravenous infusion: modeling predicts potential dose fluctuations depending on flow rates and infusion system dead volume. Anesth Analg 2006;102:1147-53
6. Rooke GA, Bowdle TA. Syringe pumps for infusion of vasoactive drugs: mechanical idiosyncrasies and recommended operating procedures. Anesth Analg 1994;78:150-6 (Pubitemid 24012615)
7. Chaput de Saintonge DM, Dixon J, Newman MS. Letter: variation in intravenous infusion rates. Br Med J 1974;4:532-3
8. Murray D. Another central line complication: failure of inotrope delivery due to equipment incompatibility. Anaesthesia 2003;58:715-6 (Pubitemid 36752749)
9. Evans A, Winslow EH. Oxygen saturation and hemodynamic response in critically ill, mechanically ventilated adults during intrahospital transport. Am J Crit Care 1995;4:106-11
10. Insel J, Weissman C, Kemper M, Askanazi J, Hyman AI. Cardiovascular changes during transport of critically ill and postoperative patients. Crit Care Med 1986;14:539-42 (Pubitemid 16085531)
11. Smith I, Fleming S, Cernaianu A. Mishaps during transport from the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1990;18:278-81 (Pubitemid 20086855)
12. Ziser M, Feezor M, Skolaut MW. Regulating intravenous fluid flow: Controller versus clamps. Am J Hosp Pharm 1979; 36:1090-4
13. Kern H, Kuring A, Redlich U, Dopfmer UR, Sims NM, Spies CD, Kox WJ. Downward movement of syringe pumps reduces syringe output. Br J Anaesth 2001;86:828-31 (Pubitemid 32514897)
14. Weiss M, Banziger O, Neff T, Fanconi S. Influence of infusion line compliance on drug delivery rate during acute line loop formation. Intensive Care Med 2000;26:776-9 (Pubitemid 30449673)