Hemispheric asymmetries and cognitive flexibility: An ERP and sLORETA study

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 78, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 148-155

  Ocklenburg, Sebastian ^a   Güntürkün, Onur ^a   Beste, Christian ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Executive functions; Lateralization; P3; P3b; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN ASYMMETRY; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; LOW RESOLUTION BRAIN ELECTROMAGNETIC TOMOGRAPHY; MALE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; STRIATE CORTEX; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; VOLUNTEER;

ADULT; BRAIN; COGNITION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL FIELDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84856227635     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Allport A., Styles E.A., Hsieh S. Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. Attention and Performance. XV 1994, 421-452. Erlbaum, Hillsdale. C. Umilta, M. Moscovitch (Eds.).
2. Banich M.T., Belger A. Interhemispheric interaction: How do the hemispheres divide and conquer a task?. Cortex 1990, 26:77-94.
3. Barcelo F., Escera C., Corral M.J., Periáñez J.A. Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control. Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences 2006, 18:1734-1748.
4. Bayer U., Kessler N., Güntürkün O., Hausmann M. Interhemispheric interaction during the menstrual cycle. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:2415-2422.
5. Beste C., Baune B.T., Falkenstein M., Konrad C. Variations in the TNF-α gene (TNF-α-308G→A) affect attention and action selection mechanisms in a dissociated fashion. Journal of Neurophysiology 2010, 104:2523-2531.
6. Beste C., Saft C., Andrich J., Gold R., Falkenstein M. Stimulus-response compatibility in Huntington's disease: a cognitive-neurophysiological analysis. Neurophysiology 2008, 99:1213-1223.
7. Beste C., Willemssen R., Saft C., Falkenstein M. Error processing in normal aging and in basal ganglia disorders. Neuroscience 2009, 159:143-149.
8. Corballis M.C. The evolution and genetics of cerebral asymmetry. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 2009, 364:867-879.
9. de Haan M., Nelson C.A. Recognition of the mother's face by 6-month-old infants: a neurobehavioral study. Child Development 1997, 68:187-210.
10. Donchin E. Surprise!.Surprise?. Psychophysiology 1981, 18:493-513.
11. Fuchs M., Kastner J., Wagner M., Hawes S., Ebersole J.S. A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model. Clinical Neurophysiology 2002, 113:702-712.
12. Gajewski P.D., Wild-Wall N., Schapkin S.A., Erdmann U., Freude G., Falkenstein M. Effects of aging and job demands on cognitive flexibility assessed by task switching. Biological Psychology 2010, 85:187-199.
13. Gomez-Gonzalez C.M., Clark V.P., Fan S., Luck S.J., Hillyard S.A. Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials. Brain Topography 1994, 7:41-51.
14. Grossi G., Savill N., Thomas E., Thierry G. Posterior N1 asymmetry to English and Welsh words in Early and Late English-Welsh bilinguals. Biological Psychology 2010, 85:124-133.
15. Hardyck C., Dronkers N., Chiarello C., Simpson G.V. The eyes have it: Exposure times and saccadic movements in visual half-field experiments. Brain and Cognition 1985, 4:430-438.
16. Hausmann M., Becker C., Gather U., Güntürkün O. Functional cerebral asymmetries during the menstrual cycle: A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:808-816.
17. Hausmann M., Güntürkün O. Steroid fluctuations modify functional cerebral asymmetries: the hypothesis of progesterone-mediated interhemispheric decoupling. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38:1362-1374.
18. Hausmann M., Kirk I.J., Corballis M.C. Influence of task complexity on manual asymmetries. Cortex 2004, 40:103-110.
19. Herrmann C.S., Knight R.T. Mechanisms of human attention: Event-related potentials and oscillations. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2001, 25:465-476.
20. Hillyard S.A., Anllo-Vento L. Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1998, 95:781-787.
21. Holmes A.P., Blair R.C., Watson J.D.G., Ford I. Non-parametric analysis of statistic images from functional mapping experiments. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 1996, 16:7-22.
22. Hsieh S. The lateralized readiness potential and P300 of stimulus-set switching. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2006, 60:284-291.
23. Hugdahl K. Symmetry and asymmetry in the human brain. European Review 2005, 13:119-133.
24. Hunter Z.R., Brysbaert M. Visual half-field experiments are a good measure of cerebral language dominance if used properly: Evidence from fMRI. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:316-325.
25. Jamadar S., Hughes M., Fulham W.R., Michie P.T., Karayanidis F. The spatial and temporal dynamics of anticipatory preparation and response inhibition in task-switching. Neuroimage 2010, 51:432-449.
26. Johannes S., Münte T.F., Heinze H.J., Mangun G.R. Luminance and spatial attention effects on early visual processing. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 1995, 2:189-205.
27. Jost K., Mayr U., Rösler F. Is task switching nothing but cue priming? Evidence from ERPs. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2008, 8:74-84.
28. Karayanidis F., Coltheart M., Michie P.T., Murphy K. Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory and poststimulus components of task switching. Psychophysiology 2003, 40:329-348.
29. Kiesel A., Steinhauser M., Wendt M., Falkenstein M., Jost K., Philipp A.M., et al. Control and interference in task switching-a review. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136:849-874.
30. Knudsen E.I. Fundamental components of attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2007, 30:57-78.
31. Kok A. On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology 2001, 38:557-577.
32. Marco-Pallares J., Grau C., Ruffini G. Combined ICA-LORETA analysis of mismatch negativity. Neuroimage 2005, 25:471-477.
33. Mazziotta J., Toga A., Evans A., Fox P., Lancaster J., Zilles K., et al. A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 2001, 356:1293-1322.
34. Measso G., Zaidel E. Effect of response programming on hemispheric differences in lexical decision. Neuropsychologia 1990, 28:635-646.
35. Monsell S. Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Science 2003, 7:134-140.
36. Mulert C., Jäger L., Schmitt R., Bussfeld P., Pogarell O., Möller H.J., et al. Integration of fMRI and simultaneous EEG: Towards a comprehensive understanding of localization and time-course of brain activity in target detection. Neuroimage 2004, 22:83-94.
37. Nicholson R., Karayanidis F., Davies A., Michie P.T. Components of task-set reconfiguration: Differential effects of 'switch-to' and 'switch-away' cues. Brain Research 2006, 1121:160-176.
38. Nicholson R., Karayanidis F., Poboka D., Heathcote A., Michie P.T. Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory task-switching processes. Psychophysiology 2005, 42:540-554.
39. Ocklenburg S., Güntürkün O., Beste C. Lateralized neural mechanisms underlying the modulation of response inhibition processes. Neuroimage 2011, 55:1771-1778.
40. Olbrich S., Mulert C., Karch S., Trenner M., Leicht G., Pogarell O., et al. EEG-vigilance and BOLD effect during simultaneous EEG/fMRI measurement. Neuroimage 2009, 45:319-332.
41. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
42. Pascual-Marqui R.D. Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): Technical details. Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology 2002, 24:5-12.
43. Pascual-Marqui R.D., Lehmann D., Koenig T., Kochi K., Merlo M.C., Hell D., et al. Low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) functional imaging in acute, neuroleptic-nai{dotless}ve, first-episode, productive schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research 1999, 90:169-179.
44. Pascual-Marqui R.D., Michel C.M., Lehmann D. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: A new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. International Journal of Psychophysiology 1994, 18:49-65.
45. Perrin F., Pernier J., Bertrand O., Echallier J.F. Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1989, 7:184-187.
46. Polich J. Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology 2007, 118:2128-2148.
47. Proverbio A.M., Cok B., Zani A. Electrophysiological measures of language processing in bilinguals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2002, 14:994-1017.
48. Rogers R.D., Monsell S. The costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1995, 124:207-231.
49. Rushworth M.F., Passingham R.E., Nobre A.C. Components of attentional set-switching. Experimental Psychology 2005, 52:83-98.
50. Saetrevik B., Hugdahl K. Priming inhibits the right ear advantage in dichotic listening: Implications for auditory laterality. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:282-287.
51. Sasaki Y., Hadjikhani N., Fischl B., Liu A.K., Marrett S., Dale A.M., et al. Local and global attention are mapped retinotopically in human occipital cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2001, 98:2077-2082.
52. Sekihara K., Sahani M., Nagarajan S.S. Localization bias and spatial resolution of adaptive and non-adaptive spatial filters for MEG source reconstruction. Neuroimage 2005, 25:1056-1067.
53. Sehlmeyer C., Konrad C., Zwitserlood P., Arolt V., Falkenstein M., Beste C. ERP indices for response inhibition are related to anxiety-related personality traits. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:2488-2495.
54. Spironelli C., Angrilli A. Influence of phonological, semantic and orthographic tasks on the early linguistic components N150 and N350. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2007, 64:190-198.
55. Spironelli C., Angrilli A. Developmental aspects of automatic word processing: Language lateralization of early ERP components in children, young adults and middle-aged subjects. Biological Psychology 2009, 80:35-45.
56. Van der Haegen L., Cai Q., Seurinck R., Brysbaert M. Further fMRI validation of the visual half field technique as an indicator of language laterality: A large-group analysis. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:2879-2888.
57. Vitacco D., Brandeis D., Pascual-Marqui R., Martin E. Correspondence of event-related potential tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging during language processing. Human Brain Mapping 2002, 17:4-12.
58. Vogel J.J., Bowers C.A., Vogel D.S. Cerebral lateralization of spatial abilities: A meta-analysis. Brain and Cognition 2003, 52:197-204.
59. Wascher E., Beste C. Tuning perceptual competition. Journal of Neurophysiology 2010, 103:1057-1065.
60. Weissman D.H., Banich M.T. The cerebral hemispheres cooperate to perform complex but not simple tasks. Neuropsychology 2000, 14:41-59.
61. Welcome S.E., Chiarello C. How dynamic is interhemispheric interaction? Effects of task switching on the across-hemisphere advantage. Brain and Cognition 2008, 67:69-75.
62. Westerhausen R., Moosmann M., Alho K., Medvedev S., Hämäläinen H., Hugdahl K. Top-down and bottom-up interaction: Manipulating the dichotic listening ear advantage. Brain Research 2009, 1250:183-189.
63. Wylie G., Allport A. Task switching and the measurement of " switch costs" Psychological Research 2000, 63:212-233.
64. Yamazaki T., Kamijo K., Kenmochi A., Fukuzumi S., Kiyuna T., Takaki Y., et al. Multiple equivalent current dipole source localization of visual event-related potentials during oddball paradigm with motor response. Brain Topography 2000, 12:159-175.