Tissue composition of mammographically dense and non-dense breast tissue

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 131, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 267-275

  Ghosh, Karthik ^a   Brandt, Kathleen R ^a   Reynolds, Carol ^a   Scott, Christopher G ^a   Pankratz, V S ^a   Riehle, Darren L ^a   Lingle, Wilma L ^a   Odogwu, Tonye ^a   Radisky, Derek C ^b   Visscher, Daniel W ^a   Ingle, James N ^a   Hartmann, Lynn C ^a   Vachon, Celine M ^a  

^a Mayo Clinic   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Histology; Mammographic density; Stroma

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR; KI 67 ANTIGEN; PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EPITHELIUM; CANCER RISK; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; STROMA CELL; TISSUE CHARACTERIZATION; TISSUE DIFFERENTIATION; TISSUE STRUCTURE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EPITHELIUM; FEMALE; HUMANS; KI-67 ANTIGEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RECEPTORS, ESTROGEN; RECEPTORS, PROGESTERONE;

EID: 84856222980     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1727-4     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. SR Cummings JA Tice S Bauer WS Browner J Cuzick E Ziv V Vogel J Shepherd C Vachon R Smith-Bindman, et al. 2009 Prevention of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: approaches to estimating and reducing risk J Natl Cancer Inst 101 384 398 19276457 10.1093/jnci/djp018
2. CM Vachon KR Brandt K Ghosh CG Scott SD Maloney MJ Carston VS Pankratz TA Sellers 2007 Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16 43 49 17220330 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI- 06-0738 (Pubitemid 46174262)
3. Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Bronskill M, Yaffe MJ, Duric N, Minkin S (2010) Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 102:1224-1237
4. McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I (2006) Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 6:1159-1169
5. Boyd NF, Jensen HM, Cooke G, Han HL, Lockwood GA, Miller AB (2000) Mammographic densities and the prevalence and incidence of histological types of benign breast disease. Reference Pathologists of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Eur J Cancer Prev 1:15-24 (Pubitemid 30428438)
6. T Li L Sun N Miller T Nicklee J Woo L Hulse-Smith MS Tsao R Khokha L Martin N Boyd 2005 The association of measured breast tissue characteristics with mammographic density and other risk factors for breast cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14 343 349 15734956 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0490 (Pubitemid 40270095)
7. D Hawes S Downey CL Pearce S Bartow P Wan MC Pike AH Wu 2006 Dense breast stromal tissue shows greatly increased concentration of breast epithelium but no increase in its proliferative activity Breast Cancer Res 8 R24 16646977 10.1186/bcr1408 (Pubitemid 44377907)
8. PC Stomper RB Penetrante SB Edge MA Arredondo LE Blumenson CC Stewart 1996 Cellular proliferative activity of mammographic normal dense and fatty tissue determined by DNA S phase percentage Breast Cancer Res Treat 37 229 236 8825134 10.1007/BF01806504 1:STN:280:DyaK28vit1GitQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26030100)
9. S Alowami S Troup S Al-Haddad I Kirkpatrick PH Watson 2003 Mammographic density is related to stroma and stromal proteoglycan expression Breast Cancer Res 5 R129 R135 12927043 10.1186/bcr622 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXntFaksb4%3D
10. SA Bartow DR Pathak FA Mettler CR Key MC Pike 1995 Breast mammographic pattern: a concatenation of confounding and breast cancer risk factors Am J Epidemiol 142 813 819 7572957 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2FhslCjtg%3D%3D
11. SJ Lin J Cawson P Hill I Haviv M Jenkins JL Hopper MC Southey IG Campbell EW Thompson 2011 Image-guided sampling reveals increased stroma and lower glandular complexity in mammographically dense breast tissue Breast Cancer Res Treat 128 505 516 21258862 10.1007/s10549-011-1346-0
12. NF Boyd JW Byng RA Jong EK Fishell LE Little AB Miller GA Lockwood DL Tritchler MJ Yaffe 1995 Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian national breast screening study J Natl Cancer Inst 87 670 675 7752271 10.1093/jnci/87.9.670 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3ntFOjsg%3D%3D
13. RA Bright AS Morrison J Brisson NA Burstein NS Sadowsky DB Kopans JE Meyer 1988 Relationship between mammographic and histologic features of breast tissue in women with benign biopsies Cancer 61 266 271 3334961 10.1002/1097-0142(19880115)61:2<266::AID-CNCR2820610212>3.0.CO;2-N 1:STN:280:DyaL1c%2FnvFyqsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 18056481)
14. ER Fisher A Palekar WS Kim C Redmond 1978 The histopathology of mammographic patterns Am J Clin Pathol 69 421 426 645642 1:STN:280: DyaE1c7mtlaqsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 8322073)
15. M Verheus G Maskarinec E Erber JS Steude J Killeen BY Hernandez JM Cline 2009 Mammographic density and epithelial histopathologic markers BMC Cancer 9 182 19523235 10.1186/1471-2407-9-182
16. JA Harvey RJ Santen GR Petroni VE Bovbjerg ME Smolkin FS Sheriff J Russo 2008 Histologic changes in the breast with menopausal hormone therapy use: correlation with breast density, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and proliferation indices Menopause 15 67 73 17558338
17. QJ Khan BF Kimler AP O'Dea CM Zalles P Sharma CJ Fabian 2007 Mammographic density does not correlate with Ki-67 expression or cytomorphology in benign breast cells obtained by random periareolar fine needle aspiration from women at high risk for breast cancer Breast Cancer Res 9 R35 17537236 10.1186/bcr1683 (Pubitemid 350215172)
18. K Kerlikowske AJ Cook DS Buist SR Cummings C Vachon P Vacek DL Miglioretti 2010 Breast cancer risk by breast density, menopause, and postmenopausal hormone therapy use J Clin Oncol 28 3830 3837 20644098 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.4770
19. CM Vachon TA Sellers RA Vierkant FF Wu KR Brandt 2002 Case-control study of increased mammographic breast density response to hormone replacement therapy Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11 1382 1388 12433715 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD38XpsVyksrc%3D (Pubitemid 35340373)
20. GA Greendale BA Reboussin S Slone C Wasilauskas MC Pike G Ursin 2003 Postmenopausal hormone therapy and change in mammographic density J Natl Cancer Inst 95 30 37 12509398 10.1093/jnci/95.1.30 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXitlOnt74%3D (Pubitemid 36124293)
21. J Cuzick JF Forbes I Sestak S Cawthorn H Hamed K Holli A Howell 2007 Long-term results of tamoxifen prophylaxis for breast cancer-96-month follow-up of the randomized IBIS-I trial J Natl Cancer Inst 99 272 282 17312304 10.1093/jnci/djk049 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjsVeitrs%3D (Pubitemid 47073490)
22. Russo J (2004) Molecular basis of breast cancer prevention and treatment. Chapter 2. In: Russo J, Russo IH (eds) The breast as a developing organ. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 11-46
23. MM Garrity LJ Burgart DL Riehle EM Hill TJ Sebo T Witzig 2003 Identifying and quantifying apoptosis: navigating technical pitfalls Mod Pathol 16 389 394 12692204 10.1097/01.MP.0000062657.30170.92 (Pubitemid 36443988)
24. Milanese TR, Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Frost MH, Vierkant RA, Maloney SD, Pankratz VS, Degnim AC, Vachon CM, Reynolds CA et al (2006) Age-related lobular involution and reduced risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1600-1607 (Pubitemid 44811643)
25. PE Shrout JL Fleiss 1979 Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability Psychol Bull 86 420 428 18839484 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cnkslSnsg%3D%3D
26. LI Lin 1989 A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility Biometrics 45 255 268 2720055 10.2307/2532051 1:STN:280:DyaL1M3kslKrtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 19109172)
27. L Lin 2000 A note on the concordance correlation coefficient Biometrics 56 324 325 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00324.x
28. TS King VM Chinchilli 2001 A generalized concordance correlation coefficient for continuous and categorical data Stat Med 20 2131 2147 11439426 10.1002/sim.845 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzosFChtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32684634)
29. WD Dupont DL Page 1985 Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease N Engl J Med 312 146 151 3965932 10.1056/NEJM198501173120303 1:STN:280:DyaL2M%2Fos1Wguw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 15192861)
30. LC Hartmann TA Sellers MH Frost WL Lingle AC Degnim K Ghosh RA Vierkant SD Maloney VS Pankratz DW Hillman, et al. 2005 Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer N Engl J Med 353 229 237 16034008 10.1056/NEJMoa044383 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXmt1KmsrY%3D (Pubitemid 41058322)
31. RH Moe T Uhlig I Kjeken KB Hagen TK Kvien M Grotle 2010 Multidisciplinary and multifaceted outpatient management of patients with osteoarthritis: protocol for a randomised, controlled trial BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11 253 21040556 10.1186/1471-2474-11-253
32. G Chanques E Viel JM Constantin B Jung S de Lattre J Carr M Cisse JY Lefrant S Jaber 2010 The measurement of pain in intensive care unit: comparison of 5 self-report intensity scales Pain 151 711 721 20843604 10.1016/j.pain.2010. 08.039
33. L Gagliese N Weizblit W Ellis VW Chan 2005 The measurement of postoperative pain: a comparison of intensity scales in younger and older surgical patients Pain 117 412 420 16153776 10.1016/j.pain.2005.07.004 (Pubitemid 41383536)
34. S Rosen M Svensson U Nilsson 2008 Calm or not calm: the question of anxiety in the perianesthesia patient J Perianesth Nurs 23 237 246 18657759 10.1016/j.jopan.2008.05.002
35. Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, Redmond CK, Kavanah M, Cronin WM, Vogel V, Robidoux A, Dimitrov N, Atkins J et al (1998) Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project P-1 study. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1371-1388 (Pubitemid 28439961)
36. MH Gail LA Brinton DP Byar DK Corle SB Green C Schairer JJ Mulvihill 1989 Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually J Natl Cancer Inst 81 1879 1886 2593165 10.1093/jnci/81.24.1879 1:STN:280:DyaK3c%2FnvF2kuw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 20026073)
37. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CPC, New York
38. SL Zeger KY Liang PS Albert 1988 Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach Biometrics 44 1049 1060 3233245 10.2307/2531734 1:STN:280:DyaL1M7ms1Onuw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 19026037)
39. NF Boyd HM Jensen G Cooke HL Han 1992 Relationship between mammographic and histological risk factors for breast cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 84 1170 1179 1635085 10.1093/jnci/84.15.1170 1:STN:280:DyaK38zktFersQ%3D%3D
40. KI Bland JG Kuhns JB Buchanan PA Dwyer LF Heuser CA O'Connor LA Gray Sr HC Polk Jr. 1982 A clinicopathologic correlation of mammographic parenchymal patterns and associated risk factors for human mammary carcinoma Ann Surg 195 582 594 7073355 10.1097/00000658-198205000-00007 1:STN:280:DyaL387otFalsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 12100961)
41. S Urbanski HM Jensen G Cooke D McFarlane P Shannon V Kruikov NF Boyd 1988 The association of histological and radiological indicators of breast cancer risk Br J Cancer 58 474 479 2849977 10.1038/bjc.1988.244 1:STN:280: DyaL1M%2Fosl2lsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 18267803)
42. M Moskowitz P Gartside C McLaughlin 1980 Mammographic patterns as markers for high-risk benign breast disease and incident cancers Radiology 134 293 295 7352202 1:STN:280:DyaL3c7gt1WgsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 10178048)
43. JE Arthur IO Ellis C Flowers E Roebuck CW Elston RW Blamey 1990 The relationship of "high risk" mammographic patterns to histological risk factors for development of cancer in the human breast Br J Radiol 63 845 849 2252976 10.1259/0007-1285-63-755-845 1:STN:280:DyaK3M%2FntVWltQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 20369904)
44. SA Bartow DR Pathak FA Mettler 1990 Radiographic microcalcification and parenchymal patterns as indicators of histologic "high-risk" benign breast disease Cancer 66 1721 1725 2208027 10.1002/1097-0142(19901015)66: 8<1721::AID-CNCR2820660812>3.0.CO;2-I 1:STN:280:DyaK3M%2FgtlyrsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 20381206)
45. Ghosh K, Hartmann LC, Reynolds C, Visscher DW, Brandt KR, Vierkant RA, Scott CG, Radisky DC, Sellers TA, Pankratz VS et al (2010) Association between mammographic density and age-related lobular involution of the breast. J Clin Oncol 28:2207-2212
46. RA Vierkant LC Hartmann VS Pankratz SS Anderson D Radisky MH Frost CM Vachon K Ghosh TJ Distad AC Degnim, et al. 2009 Lobular involution: localized phenomenon or field effect? Breast Cancer Res Treat 117 193 196 18592369 10.1007/s10549-008-0082-6