Mammographic density does not correlate with Ki-67 expression or cytomorphology in benign breast cells obtained by random periareolar fine needle aspiration from women at high risk for breast cancer

Breast Cancer Research

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2007, Pages

  Khan, Qamar J ^a   Kimler, Bruce F ^a   O'Dea, Anne P ^a   Zalles, Carola M ^a   Sharma, Priyanka ^a   Fabian, Carol J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; BRCA1 PROTEIN; ESTROGEN; GESTAGEN; KI 67 ANTIGEN; TESTOSTERONE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER PREVENTION; CYTOPATHOLOGY; FEMALE; GENE MUTATION; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HORMONE SUBSTITUTION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MONOTHERAPY; POSTMENOPAUSE; PREMENOPAUSE; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RANDOM PERIAREOLAR FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BIOPSY; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; COHORT ANALYSIS; CYTOLOGY; ESTROGEN THERAPY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; HYPERPLASIA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PATHOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK FACTOR;

ADULT; BIOPSY; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; ESTROGEN REPLACEMENT THERAPY; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; HYPERPLASIA; KI-67 ANTIGEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTMENOPAUSE; PREMENOPAUSE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 34548570831     PISSN: 14655411     EISSN: 1465542X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/bcr1683     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Fabian CJ Kimler BF Zalles CM Klemp JR Kamel S Zeiger S Mayo MS Short-term breast cancer prediction by random periareolar fine-needle aspiration cytology and the Gail risk model J Natl Cancer Inst 2000, 92:1217-1227 10.1093/jnci/92.15.1217 10922407
2. Boyd NF Greenberg C Lockwood G Little L Martin L Byng J Yaffe M Tritchler D Effects at two years of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on radiologic features of the breast: Results from a randomized trial. Canadian Diet and Breast Cancer Prevention Study Group J Natl Cancer Inst 1997, 89:488-496 10.1093/jnci/89.7.488 9086005
3. Cuzick J Warwick J Pinney E Warren RM Duffy SW Tamoxifen and breast density in women at increased risk of breast cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 2004, 96:621-628 15100340
4. Shaaban AM Sloane JP West CR Foster CS Breast cancer risk in usual ductal hyperplasia is defined by estrogen receptor-alpha and Ki-67 expression Am J Pathol 2002, 160:597-604 1850641 11839580
5. Dowsett M Ebbs SR Dixon JM Skene A Griffith C Boeddinghaus I Salter J Detre S Hills M Ashley S Biomarker changes during neoadjuvant anastrozole, tamoxifen, or the combination: Influence of hormonal status and HER-2 in breast cancer: A study from the IMPACT trialists J Clin Oncol 2005, 23:2477-2492 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.559 15767642
6. Khan QJ Kimler BF Clark J Metheny T Zalles CM Fabian CJ Ki-67 Expression in benign breast ductal cells obtained by random periareolar fine needle aspiration Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005, 14:786-789 10.1158/ 1055-9965.EPI-04-0239 15824144
7. Zalles C Kimler BF Kamel S McKittrick R Fabian CJ Cytology patterns in random aspirates from women at high and low risk for breast cancer Breast J 1995, 1:343-349 10.1111/j.1524-4741.1995.tb00260.x
8. Zalles CM Kimler BF Simonsen M Clark JL Metheny T Fabian CJ Comparison of cytomorphology in specimens obtained by random periareolar fine needle aspiration and ductal lavage from women at high risk for development of breast cancer Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006, 97:191-197 10.1007/s10549-005-9111-x 16322885
9. Masood S Frykberg ER McLellan GL Scalapino MC Mitchum DG Bullard JB Prospective evaluation of radiologically directed fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions Cancer 1990, 66:1480-1487 10.1002/ 1097-0142(19901001)66:7<1480::AID-CNCR2820660708>3.0.CO;2-O 2169989
10. Boyd NF Byng JW Jong RA Fishell EK Little LE Miller AB Lockwood GA Tritchler DL Yaffe MJ Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: Results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study J Natl Cancer Inst 1995, 87:670-675 10.1093/jnci/ 87.9.670 7752271
11. Warren R Lakhani SR Can the stroma provide the clue to the cellular basis for mammographic density? Breast Cancer Res 2003, 5:225-227 314441 12927028 10.1186/bcr642
12. Haars G van Noord PA van Gils CH Peeters PH Grobbee DE Heritable aspects of dysplastic breast glandular tissue (DY) Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004, 87:149-156 10.1023/B:BREA.0000041621.48575.9b 15377839
13. Boyd NF Jensen HM Cooke G Han HL Relationship between mammographic and histological risk factors for breast cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 1992, 84:1170-1179 10.1093/jnci/84.15.1170 1635085
14. Byrne C Colditz GA Willet WC Speizer FE Pollack M Hankinson SE Plasma insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I, IGF-binding protein 3, and mammographic density Cancer Res 2000, 60:3744-3748 10919644
15. Greendale GA Reboussin BA Sie A Singh HR Olson LK Gatewood O Bassett LW Wasilauskas C Bush T Barrett-Connor E Effects of estrogen and estrogen-progestin on mammographic parenchymal density. Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Investigators Ann Intern Med 1999, 130:262-269 10068383
16. Boyd NF Stone J Martin LJ Jong R Fishell E Yaffe M Hammond G Minkin S The association of breast mitogens with mammographic densities Br J Cancer 2002, 87:876-882 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600537 12373602
17. Boyd NF Dite GS Stone J Gunasekara A English DR McCredie MR Giles GG Tritchler D Chiarelli A Yaffe MJ Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer N Engl J Med 2002 347 886 894 10.1056/ NEJMoa013390 12239257
18. Cuzick J Warwick J Pinney E Warren RM Duffy SW Tamoxifen and breast density in women at increased risk of breast cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 2004, 96:621-628 15100340
19. Boyd NF Greenberg C Lockwood G Little L Martin L Byng J Yaffe M Tritchler D Effects at two years of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on radiologic features of the breast: Results from a randomized trial. Canadian Diet and Breast Cancer Prevention Study Group J Natl Cancer Inst 1997, 89:488-496 10.1093/jnci/89.7.488 9086005
20. Chlebowski RT Blackburn GL Elashoff RE Thomson C Goodman MT Shapiro A Giuliano AE Karanja N Hoy MK Nixon DW Dietary fat reduction in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer: Phase III Women's Intervention Nutrition Study (WINS) [abstract 10] J Clin Oncol 2005, 23:3S 10.1200/JCO.2005.10.949
21. Mincey BA Perez EA Advances in screening diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer Mayo Clin Proc 2004, 79:810-816 15182098
22. Fabian CJ Kimler BF Simonsen M Metheny T Zalles C Hall M Reduction in breast epithelial cell proliferation after six months of letrozole in high risk women on hormone replacement therapy with random periareolar fine needle aspiration evidence of atypia [abstract 5] Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004, (Suppl 1):S8
23. Boyd NF Jensen HM Cooke G Han HL Lockwood GA Miller AB Mammographic densities and the prevalence and incidence of histologic types of benign breast disease Eur J Cancer Prev 2000, 9:15-24 10.1097/ 00008469-200002000-00003 10777006
24. Bland KI Kuhns JG Buchanan JB Dwyer PA Heuser LF O'Connor CA Gray LA Sr Polk HC Jr A clinicopathologic correlation of mammographic parenchymal patterns and associated risk factors for human mammary carcinoma Ann Surg 1982, 195:582-594 1352563 7073355 10.1097/00000658-198205000-00007
25. Moskowitz M Gartside P McLaughlin C Mammographic patterns as markers for high risk benign breast disease and incidence cancers Radiology 1980, 134:293-295 7352202
26. Arthur JE Ellis IO Flowers C Roebuck E Elston CW Blamey RW The relationship of high risk mammographic patterns to histologic risk factors for development of cancer in the human breast Br J Radiol 1990, 63:845-849 2252976
27. Byrne C Schairer C Brinton LA Wolfe J Parekh N Salane M Carter C Hoover R Effects of mammographic density and benign breast disease on breast cancer risk (United States) Cancer Causes Control 2001, 12:103-110 10.1023/A:1008935821885 11246838
28. Fisher ER Palekar A Kim WS Redmond C The histopathology of mammographic patterns Am J Clin Pathol 1978, 69:421-426 645642
29. Wellings SR Wolfe J Correlative studies of the histological and radiographic appearance of the breast parenchyma Radiology 1978, 129:299-306 704841
30. Bright R Morrison A Brisson J Burstein NA Sadowsky NS Kopans DB Meyer JE Relationship between mammographic and histologic features of breast tissue in women with benign biopsies Cancer, 1988, 61:266-271 10.1002/ 1097-0142(19880115)61:2<266::AID-CNCR2820610212>3.0.CO;2-N 3334961
31. Urbanski S Jensen HM Cooke G McFarlane D Shannon P Kruikov V Boyd NF The association of histologic and radiologic indicators of breast cancer risk Br J Cancer 1988, 58;474-479 2849977
32. Hawes D Downey S Pearce CL Bartow S Wan P Pike MC Wu AH Dense breast stromal tissue greatly increased concentration of breast epithelium but no increase in its proliferative activity Breast Cancer Res 2006, 8:R24 1557710 16646977 10.1186/bcr1408
33. Stomper PC Penetrante RB Edge SB Arredondo MA Blumenson LE Stewart CC Cellular proliferative activity of mammographic normal dense and fatty tissue determined by DNA S phase percentage Breast Cancer Res Treat 1996, 37:229-236 10.1007/BF01806504 8825134