Simulating fire and forest dynamics for a landscape fuel treatment project in the Sierra Nevada

Forest Science

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 77-88

  Collins, Brandon M ^a   Stephens, Scott L ^b   Roller, Gary B ^b   Battles, John J ^b  

^a PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Fire exclusion; Fuels reduction; Minimum travel time; Wildfire modeling

Indexed keywords

FIRE BEHAVIOR; FIRE EXCLUSION; FIRE SIMULATION; FOREST DYNAMICS; FOREST STAND STRUCTURE; FUEL MODEL; FUEL TREATMENTS; MULTIPLE TIME STEP; PLANNED TREATMENTS; POTENTIAL IMPACTS; ROBUST ANALYSIS; SIERRA NEVADA; STUDY AREAS; US FOREST SERVICE; WILDFIRE MODELING;

FIRES; FUELS;

FORESTRY;

FOREST FIRES; FUELS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SIMULATION;

EID: 84856218479     PISSN: 0015749X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Agee, J.K., B. Bahro, M.A. Finney, P.N. Omi, D.B. Sapsis, C.N. Skinner, J.W. van Wagtendonk, and C.P. Weatherspoon. 2000. The use of shaded fuelbreaks in landscape fire management. For. Ecol. Manag. 127(1-3):55-66.
2. Agee, J.K., and C.N. Skinner. 2005. Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. For. Ecol. Manag. 211(1-2):83-96.
3. Ager, A.A., M.A. Finney, B.K. Kerns, and H. Maffei. 2007a. Modeling wildfire risk to northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) habitat in Central Oregon, USA. For. Ecol. Manag. 246(1):45-56.
4. Ager, A.A., A.J. McMahan, J.J. Barrett, and C.W. McHugh. 2007b. A simulation study of thinning and fuel treatments on a wildland-urban interface in eastern Oregon, USA. Landscape Urban Plan. 80(3):292-300.
5. Ager, A.A., N.M. Vaillant, and M.A. Finney. 2010. A comparison of landscape fuel treatment strategies to mitigate wildland fire risk in the urban interface and preserve old forest structure. For. Ecol. Manag. 259(8):1556-1570.
6. Albini, F.A. 1976. Estimating wildfire behavior and effects. US For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-30. 92 p.
7. Brown, J.K. 1974. Handbook for inventorying downed woody material. US For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-16. 32 p.
8. Collins, B.M., S.L. Stephens, J.J. Moghaddas, and J. Battles. 2010. Challenges and approaches in planning fuel treatments across fire-excluded forested landscapes. J. For. 108(1):24-31.
9. Cooper, C.F. 1960. Changes in vegetation, structure, and growth of South-Western pine forests since white settlement. Ecol. Monogr. 30(2):130-164.
10. Dailey, S., J. Fites, A. Reiner, and S. Mori. 2008. Fire behavior and effects in fuel treatments and protected habitat on the Moonlight fire. Fire Behavior Assessment Team. Available online www.fs.fed.us/adaptivemanagement/projects/FBAT/docs/MoonlightFinal_8_6_0 8.pdf; last accessed Apr. 8, 2010.
11. De'ath, G., and K.E. Fabricius. 2000. Classification and regression trees: A powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81(11):3178-3192.
12. Dixon, G.E. 2002. Essential FVS: A user's guide to the Forest Vegetation Simulator. US For. Serv. Internal Rep. 209 p.
13. Finney, M.A. 2001. Design of regular landscape fuel treatment patterns for modifying fire growth and behavior. For. Sci. 47(2):219-228.
14. Finney, M.A. 2002. Fire growth using minimum travel time methods. Can. J. For. Res. 32(8):1420-1424.
15. Finney, M.A. 2006. An overview of FlamMap modeling capabilities. P. 213-220 in Proc. of conf. on Fuels management-How to measure success, Andrews, P.L. and B.W. Butler (eds.). US For. Serv. RMRS-P41.
16. Finney, M.A. 2007. A computational method for optimising fuel treatment locations. Int. J. Wildland Fire 16(6):702-711.
17. Finney, M.A., R. Bartlette, L. Bradshaw, K. Close, B.M. Collins, P. Gleason, W.M. Hao, P. Langowski, J. McGinely, C.W. McHugh, E.J. Martinson, P.N. Omi, W.D. Shepperd, and K. Zeller. 2003. Part 1: Fire behavior, fuels treatments, and fire suppression on the Hayman fire. US For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-114. 148 p.
18. Finney, M.A., C.W. McHugh, and I.C. Grenfell. 2005. Standand landscape-level effects of prescribed burning on two Arizona wildfires. Can. J. For. Res. 35(7):1714-1722.
19. Finney, M.A., R.C. Seli, C.W. McHugh, A.A. Ager, B. Bahro, and J.K. Agee. 2007. Simulation of long-term landscape-level fuel treatment effects on large wildfires. Int. J. Wildland Fire 16(6):712-727.
20. Fites, J., M. Campbell, A. Reiner, and T. Decker. 2007. Fire behavior and effects related to suppression, fuel treatments, and protected areas on the Antelope Complex, Wheeler fire. FireBehaviorAssessmentTeam. Availableonlinewww.fs.fed.us/adaptivemanagement/projects/FBAT/docs/Antel ope_FINAL3_12_04_07.pdf; last accessed Apr. 8, 2010.
21. Harrod, R.J., D.W. Peterson, N.A. Povak, and E.K. Dodson. 2009. Thinning and prescribed fire effects on overstory tree and snag structure in dry coniferous forests of the interior Pacific Northwest. For. Ecol. Manag. 258(5):712-721.
22. Hessburg, P.F., J.K. Agee, and J.F. Franklin. 2005. Dry forests and wildland fires of the inland Northwest USA: Contrasting the landscape ecology of the pre-settlement and modem eras. For. Ecol. Manag. 211(1-2):117-139.
23. LANDFIRE. 2010. Available at www.landfire.gov; last accessed Oct. 22, 2010.
24. Martinson, E.J., and P.N. Omi. 2002. Performance of fuel treatments subjected to wildfires. P. 7-13 in Proc. of conf. on Fire, fuel treatments, and ecological restoration, Omi, P.N., and L.A. Joyce (eds.). US For. Serv. RMRS-P-29.
25. Miller, C., and B. Davis. 2009. Quantifying the consequences of fire suppression in two California National Parks. George Wright Forum 26(1):76-88.
26. Moghaddas, J.J., and L. Craggs. 2007. A fuel treatment reduces fire severity and increases suppression efficiency in a mixed conifer forest. Int. J. Wildland Fire 16:673-678.
27. Moghaddas, J.J., B.M. Collins, K. Menning, E.E.Y. Moghaddas, and S.L. Stephens. 2010. Fuel treatment effects on modeled landscape level fire behavior in the northern Sierra Nevada. Can. J. For. Res. 40(9):1751-1765.
28. North, M., P.A. Stine, K.L. O'Hara, W.J. Zielinski, and S.L. Stephens. 2009. An ecosystems management strategy for Sierra mixed-conifer forests, with addendum. US For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-220. 49 p.
29. NationalWildfire Coordinating Group. 2004. Fireline Handbook-Appendix B: Fire behavior. National Wildfire Coordinating Group, Incident Operations Standards Working Team. PMS 410-1. 124 p.
30. Raymond, C.L., and D.L. Peterson. 2005. Fuel treatments alter the effects of wildfire in a mixed-evergreen forest, Oregon, USA. Can. J. For. Res. 35(12):2981-2995.
31. Reinhardt, E., and N.L. Crookston. 2003. The fire and fuels extension to the forest vegetation simulator. US For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-116. 209 p.
32. Ritchie, M.W., C.N. Skinner, and T.A. Hamilton. 2007. Probability of tree survival after wildfire in an interior pine forest of northern California: Effects of thinning and prescribed fire. For. Ecol. Manag. 247(1-3):200-208.
33. Safford, H.D., D.A. Schmidt, and C.H. Carlson. 2009. Effects of fuel treatments on fire severity in an area of wildland-urban interface, Angora Fire Lake Tahoe Basin, California. For. Ecol. Manag. 258(5):773-787.
34. Schmidt, D.A., A.H. Taylor, and C.N. Skinner. 2008. The influence of fuels treatment and landscape arrangement on simulated fire behavior, Southern Cascade range, California. For. Ecol. Manag. 255(8-9):3170-3184.
35. Scott, J.H., and R.E. Burgan. 2005. Standard fire behavior models: A comprehensive set for use with Rothermel's surface fire spread model. US For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRSGTR-153. 72 p.
36. Seli, R.C., A.A. Ager, N.L. Crookston, M.A. Finney, B. Bahro, J.K. Agee, and C.W. McHugh. 2008. Incorporating landscape fuel treatment modeling into the Forest Vegetation Simulator. P. 27-39 in Proc. of conf. on Third forest vegetation simulator conference, Havis, R.N., and N.L. Crookston (eds.). US For. Serv. Conf. Proc. RMRS-P-54.
37. Skinner, C.N., M.W. Ritchie, T. Hamilton, and J. Symons. 2005. Effects of prescribed fire and thinning on wildfire severity: The Cone Fire, Blacks Mountain Experimental Forest, in Proc. of 25th Annual forest vegetation management conference, Cooper, S.L. (ed.). University of California Cooperative Extension, Redding, CA.
38. Stephens, S.L. 2001. Fire history differences in adjacent Jeffrey pine and upper montane forests in the eastern Sierra Nevada. Int. J. Wildland Fire 10(2):161-167.
39. Stephens, S.L., and B.M. Collins. 2004. Fire regimes of mixed conifer forests in the north-central Sierra Nevada at multiple spatial scales. Northwest Sci. 78(1):12-23.
40. Stephens, S.L., and J.J. Moghaddas. 2005. Experimental fuel treatment impacts on forest structure, potential fire behavior, and predicted tree mortality in a California mixed conifer forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 215(1-3):21-36.
41. Stephens, S.L., J.J. Moghaddas, C. Ediminster, C.E. Fiedler, S. Hasse, M. Harrington, J.E. Keeley, E.E. Knapp, J.D. McIver, K. Metlen, C.N. Skinner, and A. Youngblood. 2009. Fire treatment effects on vegetation structure, fuels, and potential fire severity in western U.S. forests. Ecol. Appl. 19(2):305-320.
42. Stephens, S.L., and L.W. Ruth. 2005. Federal forest-fire policy in the United States. Ecol. Appl. 15(2):532-542.
43. Strom, B.A., and P.Z. Fulé. 2007. Pre-wildfire fuel treatments affect long-term ponderosa pine forest dynamics. Int. J. Wildland Fire 16(1):128-138.
44. University of California Science Team. 2009. Sierra Nevada Adaptive Management Project. Available online at snamp. cnr. berkeley. edu/; last accessed Oct. 22, 2010.
45. US Department of Agriculture. 2001. Sierra Nevada forest plan amendment. US For. Serv. Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement.
46. US Department of Agriculture. 2004. Sierra Nevada forest plan amendment. US For. Serv. Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. R5-MB-046.
47. US Geological Survey. 2006. National elevation dataset. Available online on ned. usgs. gov/; last accessed Oct. 22, 2010.
48. van Wagner, C.E. 1968. The line intercept method in forest fuel sampling. For. Sci. 14(1):20-26.
49. van Wagtendonk, J.W. 1996. Use of a deterministic fire growth model to test fuel treatments. P. 1155-1166 in Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final report to Congress. Vol. II: Assessments and scientific basis for management options. Center for Water and Wildland Resources, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA.
50. van Wagtendonk, J.W., J.M. Benedict, and W.M. Sydoriak. 1996. Physical properties of woody fuel particles of Sierra Nevada conifers. Int. J. Wildland Fire 6(3):117-123.
51. van Wagtendonk, J.W., J.M. Benedict, and W.M. Sydoriak. 1998. Fuel bed characteristics of Sierra Nevada conifers. West. J. Appl. For. 13(3):73-84.
52. Weatherspoon, C.P., and C.N. Skinner. 1996. Landscape-level strategies for forest fuel management. P. 1471-1492 in Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final report to Congress. Vol. II: Assessments and scientific basis for management options. Wildland Resources Center Report No. 37. University of California, Davis, Davis, CA.
53. Wycoff, W.R., N.L. Crookston, and A.R. Stage. 1982. User's guide to the Stand Prognosis Model. US For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-133. 39 p.