Benefits and privacy concerns of a home equipped with a visual sensing system: A perspective from older adults

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 180-184

  Caine, Kelly E ^a   Fisk, Arthur D ^a   Rogers, Wendy A ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SMART HOME ENVIRONMENT; VISUAL SENSING SYSTEMS;

IMAGE ACQUISITION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; REMOTE SENSING;

DATA PRIVACY;

EID: 44349169380     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Adler, J. (2006, February 26th). Big brother or helper? Smart homes seek to strike balance. Chicago Tribune p. 70.
2. Boyle & Greenberg (2005) The Language of Privacy: Learning from Media Space Design and Use, in ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), no. 2, June.
3. Melenhorst, A. S., Fisk, A. D., Mynatt, E. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2004). Potential intrusiveness of aware home technology: Perceptions of older adults. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting (pp. 266-270). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
4. Shipley, W. C. (1986). Shipley Institute of Living Scale. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
5. Stevenage, S. V., Nixon, M. S., & Vince, K. (1999). Visual analysis of gait as a cue to identity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 513-526.
6. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.