Impact of the patient-reported outcomes management information system (PROMIS) upon the design and operation of multi-center clinical trials: A qualitative research study

Journal of Medical Systems

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1521-1530

  Eisenstein, Eric L ^a   Diener, Lawrence W ^a   Nahm, Meredith ^b   Weinfurt, Kevin P ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Data collection; Information systems; Outcomes assessment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); INFORMATION SYSTEM; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION;

EID: 84856212845     PISSN: 01485598     EISSN: 1573689X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-010-9429-8     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. WO Spitzer 1987 State of science 1986: quality of life and functional status as target variables for research J. Chronic. Dis. 40 465 471 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90002-6 (Pubitemid 17084792)
2. Mark, D. B.; Quality of life assessment. In: Califf, R. M.; Mark, D. B.; and Wagner, G. S. (Eds.), Acute Coronary Care, 2nd edition. Mosby-Year Book, Saint Louis, 1995.
3. RE Glasgow DJ Magid A Beck D Ritzwoller PA Estabrooks 2005 Practical clinical trials for translating research to practice: design and measurement recommendations Med. Care. 43 551 557 10.1097/01.mlr.0000163645.41407.09 (Pubitemid 40847291)
4. RE Glasgow LW Green LM Klesges, et al. 2006 External validity: we need to do more Ann. Behav. Med. 31 105 108 10.1207/s15324796abm3102-1
5. LW Green RE Glasgow 2006 Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology Eval. Health Prof. 29 126 153 10.1177/0163278705284445 (Pubitemid 43797500)
6. Green, L.; and Ottoson, J.; From efficacy to effectiveness to community and back: evidence-based practice vs. practice-based evidence. National Institutes of diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health. 2008.
7. SR Tunis DB Stryer CM Clancy 2003 Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy JAMA. 290 1624 1632 10.1001/jama.290.12.1624 (Pubitemid 37430387)
8. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS) Roadmap Initiative.; National Institutes of Health. 2008; www.nihpromis.org : Accessed November 22, 2007.
9. DN Ader 2007 Developing the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) Med. Care. 45 S1 S2 10.1097/01.mlr.0000260537.45076. 74
10. D Cella S Yount N Rothrock, et al. 2007 The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years Med. Care. 45 S3 S11 10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615. 42478.55
11. The Role of Purchasers and Payers in the Clinical Research Enterprise, Workshop Summary. National Academy, Washington, D.C.; 2002.
12. NS Sung WF Crowley Jr M Genel, et al. 2003 Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise JAMA. 289 1278 1287 10.1001/jama.289.10. 1278 (Pubitemid 37432909)
13. SH Woolf 2008 The meaning of translational research and why it matters JAMA. 299 211 213 10.1001/jama.2007.26
14. SL Mercer BJ DeVinney LJ Fine LW Green D Dougherty 2007 Study designs for effectiveness and translation research: identifying trade-offs Am. J. Prev. Med. 33 139 154 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.04.005 (Pubitemid 47161054)
15. Fixsen, D. L.; Naoom, S. F.; Blase, K. A.; Friedman, R. M.; and Wallace, F.; Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature. Tampa: National Implementation Research Network, Louise de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida. 2005; FMHI publication 231: Accessed November 17, 2007.
16. M Campbell R Fitzpatrick A Haines, et al. 2000 Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health BMJ. 321 694 696 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694
17. B Blackwood 2006 Methodological issues in evaluating complex healthcare interventions J. Adv. Nurs. 54 612 622 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03869.x (Pubitemid 43806630)
18. M Byrne ME Cupples SM Smith, et al. 2006 Development of a complex intervention for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care using the UK Medical Research Council framework Am. J. Manag. Care. 12 261 266
19. G Paul SM Smith D Whitford F O'Kelly T O'Dowd 2007 Development of a complex intervention to test the effectiveness of peer support in type 2 diabetes BMC Health Serv. Res. 7 136 10.1186/1472-6963-7-136 (Pubitemid 350134944)
20. R Power LF Langhaug T Nyamurera D Wilson MT Bassett FM Cowan 2004 Developing complex interventions for rigorous evaluation-a case study from rural Zimbabwe Health Educ. Res. 19 570 575 10.1093/her/cyg073 (Pubitemid 39280401)
21. L Robinson J Francis P James N Tindle K Greenwell H Rodgers 2005 Caring for carers of people with stroke: developing a complex intervention following the Medical Research Council framework Clin. Rehabil. 19 560 571 10.1191/0269215505cr787oa (Pubitemid 41131801)
22. G Rowlands J Sims S Kerry 2005 A lesson learnt: the importance of modelling in randomized controlled trials for complex interventions in primary care Fam. Pract. 22 132 139 10.1093/fampra/cmh704 (Pubitemid 40309618)
23. EL Eisenstein R Collins BS Cracknell, et al. 2008 Sensible approaches for reducing clinical trial costs Clin. Trials. 5 75 84 10.1177/1740774507087551 (Pubitemid 351412376)
24. Freidman, L.; Furberg, C. D.; and DeMets, D. L.; Fundamentals of Clinical Trials, 3rd edition. Mosby-Year Book, St. Louis, 1996.
25. M Corrrigan ME Cupples SM Smith, et al. 2006 The contribution of qualitative research in designing a complex intervention for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in two different healthcare systems BMC Health Serv. Res. 6 90 10.1186/1472-6963-6-90
26. B Haynes A Haines 1998 Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice BMJ. 317 273 276 10.1136/bmj.317.7153.273
27. A O'Cathain E Murphy J Nicholl 2007 Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: a mixed methods study BMC Health Serv. Res. 7 85 10.1186/1472-6963-7-85 (Pubitemid 47030153)
28. Altheide, D. L.; and Johnson, J. M.; Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In: Denzin, N. K.; and Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage, London, England, pp. 485-499, 1994.
29. MK Giacomini DJ Cook 2000 Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group JAMA. 284 357 362 10.1001/jama.284.3.357 (Pubitemid 30469863)
30. MK Giacomini DJ Cook 2000 Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care B. What are the results and how do they help me care for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group JAMA. 284 478 482 10.1001/jama.284.4.478 (Pubitemid 30484482)
31. MN Marshall 1996 Sampling for qualitative research Fam. Pract. 13 522 525 10.1093/fampra/13.6.522 (Pubitemid 27060089)
32. CP Bradley 1992 Turning anecdotes into data-the critical incident technique Fam. Pract. 9 98 103 10.1093/fampra/9.1.98
33. Evanston Northwestern Health.; Functional Specification: Analysis Phase V1.1. PROMIS Project Documentation 08/31/2006. 2006.
34. The United Kingdom's Department of Health.; Clinical Trials Tool Kit. www.ct-toolkit.ac.uk/route-maps/map-landing.cfm/cit-id=250. 2007; Accessed November 01, 2007.
35. The Stanford/Packard Center for Translational Research in Medicine (SPCTRM).; http://clinicaltrials.stanford.edu/manual/process-map.html. 2007; Accessed November 01, 2007.
36. The Center for Management Research in Healthcare.; Trial Process Views for CALGB (2006) and the Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center (2004). http://www.cmrhc.org/publications/cat-view-2.html. 2006; Accessed November 01, 2007.
37. Duke Clinical Research Institute.; http://www.dcri.duke.edu/who-we-are/. 2007; Accessed November 01, 2007.
38. US Food and Drug Administration.; Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. www.promismap@dcri. com. 2006; Accessed March 29, 2008.
39. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.; Title 21 cde of federal regulations (21 CFR part 11): electronic records, electronic signatures. http://www.fda.gov/ora/compliance-ref/part11/. 2000; Accessed March 31, 2008.